Fox News is not just celebrating Hobby Lobby's win at the Supreme Court but they are trumpeting it as an ObamaCare loss. Check out the screen grab after the jump.
In case you didn't think Fox would view something as important as a Supreme Court ruling through the prism of its partisan prism.
Share your thoughts in our comments section, below.
Do you like this post?
Andrew Radford commented
2014-07-01 13:58:30 -0400
· Flag
Joe M. That number 14 times Obama has been rebuked is a false right wing meme that was debunked by fact check site Politifact when it was a 13.
Antoinette commented
2014-07-01 02:47:11 -0400
· Flag
The Supremes’ decision will cost Hobby Lobby financially in the long run. When they are forced to close stores due to lack of revenue, and high operating costs, they may reverse their decision on contraceptives.
Chick-fil-a restaurant knew they made a huge mistake, and reversed course.
http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2014/03/03/3355701/chick-fil-2012-giving/
Joe, let Hannocchio have his fun for now. All of it will backfire soon, and he, and the rest of the Fox “News” clowns’ reputations will be ruined.
Grab some popcorn. Something major is coming down the pipeline.
Chick-fil-a restaurant knew they made a huge mistake, and reversed course.
http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2014/03/03/3355701/chick-fil-2012-giving/
Joe, let Hannocchio have his fun for now. All of it will backfire soon, and he, and the rest of the Fox “News” clowns’ reputations will be ruined.
Grab some popcorn. Something major is coming down the pipeline.
Joseph West commented
2014-07-01 01:54:12 -0400
· Flag
Roger, as despicable as this ruling is, there is only ONE way for it to be overridden, and it won’t happen this year. The ONLY course of action to overturn a Supreme Court ruling is by Congressional action. And since we’ve got a House of Representatives that has 233 members that share the same worldview as the 5 SCOTUS idiots who made this stupid decision, there won’t be a bill from the House to change the ruling. And with 45 Senators sharing the same viewpoint as the SCOTUS 5, any chance of a Senate bill even making to a floor vote is not going to happen—since the Senate rules have changed somewhat to make a “threatened” filibuster nearly impossible, a for-real filibuster would need to happen, but I’m sure some GOP blockhead will be more than happy to block any Democrat-led bill.
It’s going to take a massive turnout by Democratic voters to flip at least 20 GOP House seats and, for safety’s sake, flip at least 6 Senate seats to have the slightest chance of overruling the Supreme Court’s heinous actions.
It’s going to take a massive turnout by Democratic voters to flip at least 20 GOP House seats and, for safety’s sake, flip at least 6 Senate seats to have the slightest chance of overruling the Supreme Court’s heinous actions.
Steve St John commented
2014-06-30 17:43:32 -0400
· Flag
Rethugs think of everything as a “win-lose” proposition. There’s no such thing as a “win-win” in their way of thinking. (That’s only for us wussy liberals)
Joe Marsh commented
2014-06-30 16:47:23 -0400
· Flag
Slanthead (on the radio today, first hour) devoted most of his “glee” not to the effect on women and other intelligent issues, but solely to the fact that Obama was “rebuked” by the court. In fact, claimed Hannocchio, this is the 14th time since 2012 that the president was “slapped down” by the court.
I wasn’t counting, but he might have repeated this claim 14 times himself.
I don’t have time to fact check this, but seeing whose slimy mouth it’s coming from…
[The rest of Hannity’s outrage was centered on Obama’s effort to solve the immigration problem. Slanthead wants the border SEALED (against those little brown terrorists), and ALL the children put on planes and flown home. — More on this another time.]
I wasn’t counting, but he might have repeated this claim 14 times himself.
I don’t have time to fact check this, but seeing whose slimy mouth it’s coming from…
[The rest of Hannity’s outrage was centered on Obama’s effort to solve the immigration problem. Slanthead wants the border SEALED (against those little brown terrorists), and ALL the children put on planes and flown home. — More on this another time.]
d d commented
2014-06-30 15:59:35 -0400
· Flag
And hopefully the voters who disagree with the power that SCOTUS gave bosses over their employees’ health matters will remember that the next Congress (this year’s mid-term election) and the next Prez (2016 election) will most likely be nominating at least a couple of SCOTUS Justices. In other words, Dems and Indies who don’t like this kind of court decision, get off your butts and vote! Apathy is the progressives’ greatest enemy at election time.
Aria Prescott commented
2014-06-30 15:34:09 -0400
· Flag
Women all over the country are grabbing their pitchforks. This will be remembered in November.
Roger Hagberg commented
2014-06-30 14:11:53 -0400
· Flag
This can’t possibly be upheld. Where will FOX be when the decision is reversed? Will they even mention it? Is this the new Bengazi-Hillary’s Blood Clot-Obama Sneezed thing for them to panic about?
doors17 commented
2014-06-30 12:47:13 -0400
· Flag
I’m not the least bit surprised. Here in America it has become obvious that corporations are people and women are not.
Now if you’ll excuse me I need to go throw up.
Now if you’ll excuse me I need to go throw up.
NewsHounds
posted
about Fox News Celebrates Hobby Lobby SCOTUS Win As An ObamaCare Loss
on NewsHounds' Facebook page
2014-06-30 11:10:16 -0400
Even a Supreme Court ruling on religious rights is reported through Fox's partisan prism.