NewsHounds
We watch Fox so you don't have to!
  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Forum
  • Blogroll
  • Donate
  • Shop
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
Home →

Dr. Ben Carson Insists: Opposing Muslims For President Is Not ‘In Any Way Contradicting Our Constitution’

Posted by Ellen -7842.60pc on September 30, 2015 · Flag

Kelly_Carson_Muslims.png

Dr. Ben Carson thinks we’re just so ridiculous to suppose there might be something racist about his belief that a Muslim president would likely place Sharia law over the U.S. Constitution. And Fox’s Megyn Kelly was there to help!

As you may recall, Carson has come under fire for his statement on Meet The Press, “I would not advocate that we put a Muslim in charge of this nation. I absolutely would not agree with that.” Since then, Fox News hosts have been strongly supportive. Megyn Kelly has now joined the flock.

First, Kelly played a clip of a spokesman from the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), asking Carson to withdraw from the race because of those remarks, saying he’s “unfit to lead” and that his views are “inconsistent” with the U.S. Constitution.

The relevant passage of the U.S. Constitution is Article VI, which says: “No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.”

Instead of focusing on the substance of the criticism of Carson, Kelly, who is an attorney, herself, accused CAIR of breaking the law. She suggested that their criticism of Carson violated IRS rules which prohibit 501(c)(3) organizations from participating, directly or indirectly, in any political campaign, whether on behalf of or in opposition to a candidate.

"So maybe CAIR is in some trouble," Kelly sneered. Then she helped ensure Carson is not.

Kelly began by continuing an earlier discussion in which she just couldn’t understand how Daily Beast writer Dean Obeidallah could have called the 2016 GOP campaign “the most racist presidential campaign ever.”

“Isn’t that what the leftists always do when they can’t find anything else to talk about?” Carson said condescendingly. “They drop back to racism. That’s their standard defense. And it’s so silly when you stop and think about it.”

Well, not really. Obeidallah wrote:

Yes, we do understand exactly what Carson and the other GOP candidates are saying. It’s no longer code; it’s now in our face. The GOP’s 2016 platform is that Latino immigrants are coming to rape you, blacks want handouts, gays are waging a holy war versus Christians, and Muslims are not loyal to America.

He’s referring, of course, to Donald Trump’s comments about Mexicans, along with his Willie Horton-style ad, Jeb Bush’s comments about blacks voting for Democrats because they offer “free stuff” and Ted Cruz' accusation that gays are waging a “jihad” against “people of faith” who don’t support gay marriage. As well as Carson’s.

Carson continued by pretending his bigotry is not bigoted because Muslims can be different races. And then pretending he never really opposed a Muslim president so long as the person isn’t “too” Muslim, which is obviously a concern to him.

CARSON: What I’ve talked about is a system of living which is what Islam is. It has nothing to do with race. You know, there are people of lots of different races who embrace that. And as I’ve said before, it really doesn’t matter what a person’s religion is if in fact they’re willing to accept the American standards, American principles, American values and to subjugate their beliefs to our constitution, then, you know, that’s very acceptable. I don’t know anything racist about that.

Kelly gave Carson a pass on this contradiction with his earlier statement. Instead, she cited a statement by Fox News contributor Charles Krauthammer in which he said that the Constitution doesn’t just say “what you’re not allowed to do” but also suggests “what you shouldn’t want to do” and that another purpose is to “discourage and delegitimize this kind of authoritarian thinking,” meaning Carson’s.

Apparently, we can add “constitutional expert” to Dr. Carson’s newly-minted resumé.

CARSON: Well, I think Charles Krauthammer usually has pretty solid information and has things to say that are worthwhile. I think he may be a little off base there. And there’s nothing that I have said that is in any way contradicting our Constitution. In fact, I have a book coming out next week about the Constitution that really breaks it down. And I hope that Dr. Krauthammer will read that book.

Kelly quipped, “That’s a disagreement of the doctors. We’re going to get a third opinion now.” But even though she’s the one with the legal degree, she didn’t offer a third opinion. She merely changed the subject.

Watch this latest version of Carson rehab below, from the September 29 The Kelly File.

Follow @NewsHounds

Follow @NewsHoundEllen


Do you like this post?
Tweet

Showing 10 reactions



    Review the site rules
Kab Ashraf commented 2015-10-01 02:04:55 -0400 · Flag
I wish that everyone would read the Qur’an, Sahih Bukhari and Chapter 30 of Risala. I urge all the presidential candidates to read “Islam 101 For Politicians”.
Joseph West commented 2015-09-30 15:38:49 -0400 · Flag
Ed, so what do you think about Kim Davis’s decision to place her CHRISTIAN faith over her CONSTITUTIONAL duties? Why isn’t Carson attacking Davis, and the other like-minded “Christians” who have no problem demanding that THEIR religious liberties be given priority over the civil rights (religious or otherwise) of others?

Carson was wrong then. He’s still wrong now.

And I think it’s time for Megyn to let her hair go back to its natural color. The bleach is starting to really affect whatever brain cells she still has. (For a supposed lawyer, she certainly doesn’t act like one. Then again, her focus was more along the lines of business and commercial law, areas where the Constitution doesn’t really play much of a role.)
Lakeview Greg commented 2015-09-30 11:31:38 -0400 · Flag
Did Carson just morph his campaign into a book promo-tour?
radpat_USA commented 2015-09-30 10:58:15 -0400 · Flag
Successful implementation of Sharia law only happens if 90% of the American population are as fucking stupid as 100% of the typical Fox News viewer.
truman commented 2015-09-30 10:37:45 -0400 · Flag
Fux Noise will soon end its fling with Uncle Ben. No way another black guy is going to live in their White House. Uncle Ben will fade into obscurity just like Herman CrazyTrain Cain.
Paul Hoover commented 2015-09-30 09:22:53 -0400 · Flag
It’s irrelevant what a Muslim president thinks about how Islam relates to the Constitution. They are sworn to uphold the Constitution of the United States and by so swearing they would be obligated to defend one’s right to say Mohammed is a false prophet.
How ignorant are you Republicans anyway, geez the Bill of Rights is pretty clear on the Free Speech question and the Constitution forbids religious litmus tests for office. But hey God’s law and all that nonsense right? I mean if Davis can defy the Constitution why not a Muslim?
El 84 commented 2015-09-30 08:42:58 -0400 · Flag
Ed – You will still have your right to call Mohammed a false prophet. You will not have to live under Sharia law. If a Muslim were elected, he certainly isn’t going to be a hard liner. Are Muslim cartooons a big issue for you? Do you know jack shit about the Koran.
When I lived in Saudi Arabia I interacted with many nice people. There are millions of Islamic people here in the U.S.
I am way more concerned with the American Christian Taliban and the spread of Christian fundamentalism in this country. Fascist creationists screwing our schools up.
Xenophobic dumbass.
El 84
Erich Pomfret commented 2015-09-30 06:28:20 -0400 · Flag
Ed Bradford: How about, instead of hourly radio and TV spots, we pay you to carry a large sign proclaiming: “MOHAMMED WAS A FALSE PROFIT?” Then, everybody can laugh at your xenophobia, instead of just us.
Ed Bradford commented 2015-09-30 00:58:49 -0400 · Flag
Carson has nothing to ‘rehab’. The Koran as written and understood by the vast majority of Middle Eastern Muslims is incompatible with “life, liberty, pursuit of happiness, property rights, freedom of contract, freedom of conscience and freedom of speech”. No real Muslim can dispute that statement. Idiot progressives will try but they all fail. Does America think a Muslim POTUS would defend my right to say “MOHAMMED WAS A FALSE PROFIT” on hourly PSA announcements on Radio and TV? You folks seem to have no understanding of the Koran and how Muslims react to Mohammed cartoons.

Anyone is stupid if they think a Muslim POTUS would not attack me with fervor.
NewsHounds posted about Dr. Ben Carson Insists: Opposing Muslims For President Is Not ‘In Any Way Contradicting Our Constitution’ on NewsHounds' Facebook page 2015-09-30 00:46:41 -0400
Megyn Kelly was there to help!








or sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Follow @NewsHounds on Twitter
Subscribe with RSS


We’ve updated our Privacy Policy
Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Created with NationBuilder