NewsHounds
We watch Fox so you don't have to!
  • Home
  • About
  • Naughty Corner
  • Forum
  • Archives
  • Blogroll
  • Donate
  • Shop
  • Contact
Home →

New York Times’ Scathing Smackdown Of Roger Ailes And Fox News’ Brand Of Journalism

Posted by Ellen -462.40pc on May 06, 2012 · Flag

Bill Keller, the former executive editor of The New York Times – and a frequent Fox News target – wrote a scathing editorial about Roger Ailes and Fox News. Finally, a mainstream journalist not only gets exactly what’s wrong with Fox but is able to express it in perfect prose.

There are so many nuggets in the piece, I can’t reprint them all here and still feel confident I’m on the right side of the copyright laws. But starting with the title, Murdoch’s Pride Is America’s Poison, here are a few of the most golden ones:

Partisan journalism, while not my thing, has a long tradition. Though I do wonder if the folks at Fox appreciate that this genre is more European than American.

My complaint is that Fox pretends very hard to be something it is not, and in the process contributes to the corrosive cynicism that has polarized our public discourse.

I doubt that people at Fox News really believe their programming is “fair and balanced” — that’s just a slogan for the suckers — but they probably are convinced that what they have created is the conservative counterweight to a media elite long marinated in liberal bias. They believe that they are doing exactly what other serious news organizations do; they just do it for an audience that had been left out before Fox came along.

…Traditional news organizations, for all their shortcomings, see it as their mission to provide — and test — the information you need to form intelligent opinions. We aim to challenge lazy assumptions. Fox panders to them.

Keller goes on to talk about three forthcoming biographies of Roger Ailes and how Ailes is trying to use the same toxic tactics he uses in cable news to manipulate what will be said about him in the books.

But Keller also suggests that the one biography Ailes is doing his best to sabotage, from New York Magazine’s Gabriel Sherman, is also the one that will do the best job of getting the story and getting it right.

Sherman’s work is densely reported and not innuendo-laden or agenda-driven. (He has written a fair amount about The Times, and pulled no punches.) He may be 32, but he’s old-school.

Whether Sherman will prevail against the Ailes' Goliath remains to be seen. But Sherman is no pushover and I’ll bet there will be lots of people rooting for him.

 


Do you like this post?
Tweet
submit to reddit

Showing 6 reactions



    Review the site rules
truman commented 2012-05-06 22:43:52 -0400 · Flag
Gabriel Sherman’s biography of Jabba T. Ailes will make my book-of-the-month club list.
Joseph West commented 2012-05-06 22:01:58 -0400 · Flag
Mj, I’m not sure where Keller gets his history lesson, but the first century and a half of American journalism was INTENSELY partisan and would make today’s “journalists” (well, at least, those employed by the Murdoch organizations) incredibly envious of the level of sheer venom and bile dispensed by newspapers at their targets and absorbed with relish by those papers’ readers. Remember the attacks on Grover Cleveland in 1884 (“Ma, ma, where’s my pa?”—based on allegations of siring an illegitimate child) as well as Thomas Nast’s entire output against Boss Tweed?

Journalism as a whole only became relatively neutral or non-partisan after WWII (the McCarthy era notwithstanding) and didn’t really change until the late 1980s after the Reagan Administration abolished the Fairness Doctrine, when extreme right-wingers became freer to get their views out through radio and television stations without the “unnecesary” restriction of requiring a “balance” be presented on what was broadcast (ie, a station that promoted a bill requiring looser controls for handgun ownership was previously required to permit someone opposing that bill; without the Fairness Doctrine, the station could now have dozens of people supporting looser handgun ownership and not let a single voice of opposition be heard).

So, basically, that “non-partisan” journalism thrived for about 40 years. (And wasn’t it about a decade ago when the Times was one of the backers of that whole “George and Dick’s Funtime in Iraq” story? And wasn’t the Times right there attacking the people who opposed that little adventure and piling in on calling them “traitors”? When exactly did the Times return to being “neutral”?)
Jay Diamond commented 2012-05-06 20:18:21 -0400 · Flag
Great post, Ellen. And after he gets finished with Ailes, hopefully, Sherman will do the same for hannity.
NewsHounds posted about New York Times’ Scathing Smackdown Of Roger Ailes And Fox News’ Brand Of Journalism on NewsHounds' Facebook page 2012-05-06 19:53:13 -0400
Finally, a mainstream journalist gets it exactly right in explaining what's wrong with Fox News.
mj - the same one commented 2012-05-06 19:21:26 -0400 · Flag
Partisan journalism, while not my thing, has a long tradition. Though I do wonder if the folks at Fox appreciate that this genre is more European than American.

Oh, SNAP!

I wonder if Fox and it’s loyal viewers ever consider this whenever they rail about “European Socialism” . . .

.
blog advertising is good for you






or sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Subscribe with RSS

Make Custom Gifts at CafePress


Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Created with NationBuilder