NewsHounds
We watch Fox so you don't have to!
  • Home
  • About
  • Forum
  • Archives
  • Blogroll
  • Donate
  • Shop
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
Home →

The Dumbing Down Of Fox Viewers Can Now Be Scientifically Proven

Posted by Headly Westerfield 98.60pc on April 10, 2012 · Flag

It’s long been a contention of smart people (in other words: some smart people say) that watching Fox “News” makes people dumb.  Study after study has confirmed that people who watch Fox “News” are among the most misinformed in ‘Merka.  This is just one of the many points Chris Mooney makes in his upcoming book “The Republican Brain: The Science of Why They Deny Science--and Reality.”  AlterNet has printed a terrific excerpt called “The Science of Fox News: Why Its Viewers are the Most Misinformed,” in which Mooney not only cites all the studies, but also includes a partial list of topics on which Fox “News” viewers are lied to led astray.  Mooney also argues that studying Fox "News" becomes circular logic: Which came first?  In my mind it's a lot like self-perpetuating motion machine:

In summary, then, the “science” of Fox News clearly shows that its viewers are more misinformed than the viewers of other stations, and are indeed this way for ideological reasons. But these are not necessarily the reasons that liberals may assume. Instead, the Fox “effect” probably occurs both because the station churns out falsehoods that conservatives readily accept—falsehoods that may even seem convincing to some liberals on occasion—but also because conservatives are overwhelmingly inclined to choose to watch Fox to begin with.

At the same time, it’s important to note that they’re also disinclined to watch anything else. Fox keeps constantly in their minds the idea that the rest of the media are “biased” against them, and conservatives duly respond by saying other media aren’t worth watching—it’s just a pack of lies. According to Public Policy Polling’s annual TV News Trust Poll (the 2011 run), 72 percent of conservatives say they trust Fox News, but they also say they strongly distrust NBC, ABC, CBS and CNN. Liberals and moderates, in contrast, trust all of these outlets more than they distrust them (though they distrust Fox). This, too, suggests conservative selective exposure.

And there is an even more telling study of “Fox-only” behavior among conservatives, from Stanford’s Shanto Iyengar and Kyu Hahn of Yonsei University, in Seoul, South Korea. They conducted a classic left-right selective exposure study, giving members of different ideological groups the chance to choose stories from a news stream that provided them with a headline and a news source logo—Fox, CNN, NPR, and the BBC—but nothing else. The experiment was manipulated so that the same headline and story was randomly attributed to different news sources. The result was that Democrats and liberals were definitely less inclined to choose Fox than other sources, but spread their interest across the other outlets when it came to news. But Republicans and conservatives overwhelmingly chose Fox for hard news and even for soft news, and ignored other sources. “The probability that a Republican would select a CNN or NPR report was around 10%,” wrote the authors.

In other words Fox News is both deceiver and enabler simultaneously. First, its existence creates the opportunity for conservatives to exercise their biases, by selecting into the Fox information stream, and also by imbibing Fox-style arguments and claims that can then fuel biased reasoning about politics, science, and whatever else comes up.

Mooney’s long book excerpt is well-worth reading in full.  Without directly saying so, he also seems to explain why Air America failed, and why MSNBC’s ratings are tiny when compared to the Fox “News” propaganda machine.  Progressives tend graze at many news sources and make up their own minds while Conservatives self-select for deeply psychological reasons of “[c]losed-mindedness and authoritarianism” in a “classic nature-nurture mélange,” which “…took the emergence of a station like Fox News before these tendencies could be fully activated—polarizing America not only over politics, but over reality itself.”  It’s only what NewsHounds has been saying forever.

Follow @NewsHounds

Follow @NewsHoundEllen


Do you like this post?
Tweet

Showing 6 reactions



    Review the site rules
Aria Prescott commented 2012-04-10 15:32:02 -0400 · Flag
Or they’ll only repeat the same disproven/irrelevant point over and over, Truman. Never forget that part.
truman commented 2012-04-10 13:21:57 -0400 · Flag
The Fuxtard species is easy to identify. Although they may initially appear almost normal, once you try to engage them in intelligent conversation, all signs of intellect disappear. They will loudly inform you that your President is a Kenyan-born, socialist Muslim. They know this cuz Fux Noise tells them this repeatedly. The other media are involved in conspiratorially coverup orchestrated by George Soros.
doors17 commented 2012-04-10 13:16:35 -0400 · Flag
Fox should have Victoria Jackson give the rebuttal. She would be the perfect choice since she would be able to commutate to the level of their audience.
NewsHounds posted about The Dumbing Down Of Fox Viewers Can Now Be Scientifically Proven on NewsHounds' Facebook page 2012-04-10 13:04:09 -0400
The Dumbing Down Of Fox Viewers Can Now Be Scientifically Proven
radpat_USA commented 2012-04-10 11:57:09 -0400 · Flag
Conservative and stupid complemented each other long before the advent of Fox News!
scooter commented 2012-04-10 11:54:19 -0400 · Flag
This only reinforces what progressives have known all along – cons are dumber than a bag of hammers and should not be allowed to play with sharp objects lest they hurt themselves. Too bad we can’t legislate a way to keep them from voting & breeding








or sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Follow @NewsHounds on Twitter
Subscribe with RSS


We’ve updated our Privacy Policy
×
Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Created with NationBuilder