NewsHounds
We watch Fox so you don't have to!
  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Forum
  • Blogroll
  • Donate
  • Shop
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
Home →

Hannity Trots Out Discredited Clinton Conspiracy Crackpot Kathleen Willey To Go After Hillary

Posted by Ellen -7842.60pc on March 12, 2015 · Flag

Hannity_Willey.png

Remember Kathleen Willey? She accused Bill Clinton of sexually harassing her, insinuated he had her husband killed, blamed him for the burglary of her house and more. Even the independent counsel investigating the Monica Lewinsky matter found her not credible. 

But what’s not to like if you’re Sean Hannity, just itching to smear Hillary Clinton?  

In his introduction to a lengthy discussion with her, Hannity quoted Willey as saying Hillary Clinton “is the war on women” and that she has “even orchestrated a, quote, terror campaign against some, including her.” Hannity just forgot to mention that even Ken Starr, the independent counsel on the Monica Lewinsky case, rejected Willey's allegations about Bill because she had contradicted herself, made false statements to investigators – and wrote to Clinton seeking a job, asking for his help and expressing gratitude after the supposed harassment.

But Hannity merely introduced Willey as a “former Clinton White House volunteer.”

Willey spent most of her air time re-hashing her allegation of getting “fondled” by Bill Clinton, as the independent counsel report put it.

Willey told Hannity, “I was assaulted by her husband in the Oval Office.” She then repeated in great detail her story of needing a paying job, asking President Clinton to help her, and his offer to help followed by his supposedly cornering her. Only now, she said, "If you want the details, you can read my book (she named it) because I just don’t want to go into the details. It’s pretty obvious, it was unwelcome and inappropriate and out of line and I consider myself lucky to get out of there.”

Hannity didn’t say a word about Willey’s credibility problem. Nor the long list of implausible and conspiratorial claims about the Clintons’ alleged efforts to silence her. Instead, he prodded Willey into attacking Hillary Clinton more specifically.

“You say that Hillary is the war on women… and that she orchestrated a terror campaign against women. Well, explain that part,” Hannity urged.

Unfortunately for Hannity, Willey never came up with much against Hillary.

WILLEY: When I was writing my book… I got calls from a number of women who insisted, and I promised that their names would be anonymous… and, um, same story over and over and over again. …These women were terrorized. One woman was so terrorized, she left the country. They were afraid.

Hannity interrupted to target Hillary more directly. “How was she, though, specifically involved? …I get the Bill part. What did she do?”

"She put it all into play," Willey alleged, without offering - or being asked for any proof. "She had her attack dogs: Sydney Blumenthal, George (sic) Carville… She had three of the best known private investigators in the country on retainer. They were part of it. They know how to do it. They know exactly how to do it."

Hannity gave up. “Alright, let me ask you this,” he interrupted. “The Clinton Foundation has taken all this money from countries like Saudi Arabia, Oman, Algeria, Qatar, the UAE, Kuwait, Brunei.” Hannity has fixated on the fact that these countries have poor records on women’s rights as “proof” that Hillary doesn’t really care about women.

“What is your take on that?” he asked Willey. When she didn’t say anything more than “money is the most important thing to the Clintons,” he pushed her more explicitly. “In other words, she won’t criticize them because the money’s more important than the principal of standing up or being a champion for women?

“Exactly,” Willey agreed. “This business of being the women’s advocate, and the ‘war on women' attack on the Republicans is totally bogus.”

Will Hannity dredge up the old “The Clintons killed Vince Foster” conspiracy theory next?

Watch Willey below, from the March 11 Hannity.

Follow @NewsHounds

Follow @NewsHoundEllen


Do you like this post?
Tweet

Showing 20 reactions



    Review the site rules
Kathleen Willey commented 2015-03-22 13:14:33 -0400 · Flag
OH,really Brad? Never saw that. I don’t remember seeing you when I did the pre-tape here or live on his set. You’re just a low level employee who hates his life and probably not married. Do your homework before you you write such vicious and mean-spirited vitriol. Have you heard what the acronym “SPIN” for libs means: S-switch the subject, P-pander, I- interrupt, and finally N-name-call. It fits you to a “t.” Read up and then go straight to hell where you and your ilk should be. You’re pathetic. I will continue to pray for you….

.
Ellen commented 2015-03-16 23:34:41 -0400 · Flag
Kathleen Willey,

From Fox’s Trace Gallagher:

Former President Bill Clinton is not named in the new motion but in court documents filed in Palm Beach Circuit Court, Clinton is again linked to his old friend from back in the early 2000s. The records say the former president flew several times on Epstein’s plane to his private island estate where underage sex parties were allegedly happening. There is no evidence linking the former president with any of those events but Epstein’s personal computer records also show the former president’s email address along with 21 of his phone numbers. After Epstein was convicted in 2008, Bill Clinton apparently cut all ties to him but now brand new questions about the relationship are again being raised.
Read more at http://www.newshounds.us/kelly_and_stirewalt_dishonestly_make_prince_andrew_sex_case_about_bill_clinton_010615#2CePwWXYOwPfs3pW.99

More on the current legal case against Epstein:

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jan/02/jeffrey-epstein-rise-and-fall-of-teacher-turned-tycoon
Kathleen Willey commented 2015-03-16 22:40:13 -0400 · Flag
“Crackpots” know these things…
David Ruch commented 2015-03-16 18:09:32 -0400 · Flag
How do you come to posses information and written evidence the plaintiffs in the Epstein lawsuit do not have?
Kathleen Willey commented 2015-03-16 10:23:38 -0400 · Flag
Clinton was listed as a “guest” on Epstein’s private jet logs 13 times (that we know of) to his private island. What do you think he was going there for, to work on his sun tan? Underage girls were brought to that island by Epstein’s “assistant” (pimp.) That’s call sex trafficking. Last I heard that’s a serious crime. Do your homework before you quote O’Reilly, another proven liar. Face it, Clinton is a pervert and a predator, enabled by his lying power hungry wife.
Ellen commented 2015-03-16 01:22:32 -0400 · Flag
Kathleen Willey, Clinton was not named in the latest Jeffrey Epstein lawsuit. Even Fox has acknowledged that. Clinton cut ties to Epstein in 2008 and he was never fingered as being involved in the sexcapades. Don’t believe me? Here’s Bill O’Reilly:

http://www.newshounds.us/o_reilly_shoots_down_attempts_to_make_prince_andrew_sex_case_about_bill_clinton_010815

and Fox’s Trace Gallagher:
http://www.newshounds.us/kelly_and_stirewalt_dishonestly_make_prince_andrew_sex_case_about_bill_clinton_010615
Kathleen Willey commented 2015-03-15 12:51:46 -0400 · Flag
Troll the internet? My, my, you really can’t handle the truth can you? Like I’ve said before, “We women are our own worst enemies.”
Jane S commented 2015-03-15 11:35:09 -0400 · Flag
Sorry to hurt your feelings, Kathleen, but if you’re going to troll the web and eavesdrop on other people’s conversations for your name to see how your Hannity appearance went down, you might as well find out what people really think.
Kathleen Willey commented 2015-03-15 11:09:27 -0400 · Flag
Why is it that libs resort to vitriol, below the belt vile, hurtful and untrue accusations when they can’t come up with legitimate and reasonable reactions. I was not slurring my words, nor was I heavily medicated. Nervous, yes. I fought Ken Starr’s subpoena for a year until I was FORCED to testify, two days after my children and I were horribly threatened to go into court and perjure myself. Thank the good Lord I didn’t. I wrote a book eight years ago, so I was not exactly “pmping” it. I turned down obscene amounts of money, for which I am paying dearly today, but my credibility was too important to me. One thing i have always thought and still do today is that we women can be our own worst enemies. I will continue to fight this fight for as long as I can and, by the way, I don’t recall any of you here who have made such scurrilous, below the belt vile accusations, present in the oval office fighting off this this disgusting predator. She, on the other hand enables his miserable behavior. Have any of you taken the time to read about his relationship with billionaire pedophile, Jeffrey Epstein, in which Clinton has been named in a huge lawsuit. Hundred of young, underage girls were brought to his “orgy island” in the Caribbean to “service” the like of Clinton, Allen Dershowitz and many other well-known names. Consider that happening to you QWN children, nieces and even grandchildren. Inform yourself before you spew your hate and false accusation against people like me who are telling the TRUTH. Shame on all of you, especially you, Jane S.
Bob Harrow commented 2015-03-13 04:52:29 -0400 · Flag
I love money and i aint no clinton
Bob Harrow commented 2015-03-13 04:51:10 -0400 · Flag
Crosseyed fckwit
Bob Harrow commented 2015-03-13 04:49:00 -0400 · Flag
The turd didnt look at the camera. No eye contact. Mumbled incoherent shit hammity loved it. 2 fckd up losers. Where did that fool come from. Walmart back room???
Antoinette commented 2015-03-12 20:49:07 -0400 · Flag
Circle this around conservative websites, Joseph.

The Billionaire Loses The Billionaire

http://money.cnn.com/2015/02/04/media/prince-alwaleed-news-corp/
Joseph West commented 2015-03-12 17:42:14 -0400 · Flag
Hmm. Maybe Mr Hannity could explain why his employers are supporting the terrorists because “money’s more important” than stopping terrorists. After all, the Saudis aren’t exactly innocent of sponsoring terrorists (especially of the “Moos-lim” variety) yet not only are the Saudis are “allies in the war on terror” but they’re also in FoxNoise’s proverbial bed since one of NewsCorp’s financial partners is one of the Saudi royal family.

Maybe Sean should distance himself from FoxNoise unless he wants his “ties to terrorism” to be further detailed. Oh wait. Something he said about Hillary could be phrased in a way to describe himself: “In other words, I won’t criticize the Saudis because the money’s more important than the principal of standing up or being a champion for the victims of terrorists.”
Steve St John commented 2015-03-12 15:38:43 -0400 · Flag
It’s just part of the standard Republican strategy – attack, attack, attack. It’s what they do since they have nothing positive to offer.
truman commented 2015-03-12 10:41:19 -0400 · Flag
KKKlannity will dredge up anything he can from the Fux Noise cesspool and throw it in hope that it will stick. The Reich Wing is scared shitless of Hillary. They know that she will trounce any and all in their clown car of candidates.
Anita Hall commented 2015-03-12 09:14:17 -0400 · Flag
On the bright side ~ these jokers are so busy trashing Hillary Clinton right now ~ they don’t have time to bother with our President. Can’t you just see the horror on their faces should she win in 2016! Four more years to have these pathetic “so-called news reporters” go on their daily rampages! Maybe they’ll all get laryngitis at the same time. We should be so lucky.
Antoinette commented 2015-03-12 03:27:32 -0400 · Flag
Silly Willey has a book to pimp. Otherwise she wouldn’t be on opportunist Hannocchio’s third rate show.

We posted earlier in the year that Hannocchio plans to use everything in his power to take down Hillary. She’s a threat to the Republican Party.

You can’t play nice with these worthless cafeteria Catholics. They are treacherous, scheming, dirty, evil and vengeful. It’s equivalent of dealing The Horned One with the tail.
Jane S commented 2015-03-12 02:19:04 -0400 · Flag
I’d feel sorry for this pathetic woman if she wasn’t so destructive. I was struck by how much she slurred her words during this interview. She was clearly on some kind of heavy medication and couldn’t think straight, never mind speak clearly. I’m sure by now, she believes this whole story, which has been preposterous from the beginning. My guess is she, in her no doubt distraught and desperate state at the time, made a heavy pass on BC and was rejected.
NewsHounds posted about Hannity Trots Out Discredited Clinton Conspiracy Crackpot Kathleen Willey To Go After Hillary on NewsHounds' Facebook page 2015-03-12 02:16:35 -0400
Will Hannity dredge up the old “The Clintons killed Vince Foster” conspiracy theory next?








or sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Follow @NewsHounds on Twitter
Subscribe with RSS


We’ve updated our Privacy Policy
Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Created with NationBuilder