NewsHounds
We watch Fox so you don't have to!
  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Forum
  • Blogroll
  • Donate
  • Shop
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
Home →

Hannity Refuses Ed Schultz's Challenge To Debate

Posted by Ellen -7859.80pc on November 01, 2013 · Flag

Ed Schultz slammed Sean Hannity hard today. Schultz called Hannity the "king of cheap shots," called out the media in general for focusing on the problems of the Obamacare rollout rather than its promise and focused on Hannity, in particular, for defending "junk insurance policies" that don't "cover snot" in his zeal to malign the Affordable Care Act. Schultz also challenged Hannity to a debate and dared him to "prove me wrong."

Schultz was responding to attacks on him during his weekly "Media Mash" segment last night. So Schultz issued this challenge in response:

I'm about the truth and it would seem to me that if I'm wrong on these things, that Hannity would want to go face to face with me. ...So let's get it on Sean, come on. You pick the venue. You sell the tickets, you keep the profit. You're all about that. I just want to prove that you're wrong. ...Certainly, you'd have the character to go face to face with me, wouldn't you?

Look, I believe that Sean Hannity and Fox News has (sic) done a terrible disservice to this country by misleading people on a lifesaving policy such as Obamacare. ...Let's go face to face. Come on, Sean. Let's do it for the country! Come on, make a big fool out of Big Eddie.

...But you won't do it because you know I have the facts - and oh, by the way, I have the law on my side.

The entire segment is worth watching, especially if you've been fed a steady diet of "Obamacare is a disaster" all week in the rest of the media.

But, unfortunately, Hannity seems to be standing by his attack in just the same way he stood by his promise to undergo waterboarding for charity. By weaseling. In a statement to Mediaite, he first boasted about debating Rev. Al Sharpton, then said: 

While I understand little Eddie desperately needs attention, he unfortunately does not have the intelligence, wit, humor or debating skills of Rev. Sharpton, or somebody like James Carville who I have also publicly debated numerous times.

Too (sic) be blunt I really have better things to do with my time than attempt to educate a total buffoon who calls Laura Ingraham horrible names, and publicly states ‘we ought to rip out Dick Cheney’s heart, stomp on it, and shove it back in him.’ Enough said.

Well, I'll agree "enough said." But not in the way Hannity meant it.

Follow @NewsHounds

Follow @NewsHoundEllen


Do you like this post?
Tweet

Showing 14 reactions



    Review the site rules
Antoinette commented 2013-11-03 14:32:47 -0500 · Flag
Hannocchio is a poor excuse for a father. He is an embarrassment to his two children.

Their classmates probably laugh at his children because their father is a coward. The stares, gossip, the humiliation at this Long Island private Catholic school.

“Why is your father afraid to debate Ed Schultz?,” a classmate would probably ask. “Your father is a coward,” the classmates would say, laughing as they head to their next class.

Imagine being the child of this man. We would be highly embarrassed to say he’s our father. A coward who is afraid to man-up, for the sake of his two children.
scooter commented 2013-11-02 19:47:16 -0400 · Flag
Hannity is a coward plain & simple. He is a pathetic excuse for a human, and a total waste of flesh. Wish I could meet him face to face and tell him what an awful little prick he is.
Doug Dupuis commented 2013-11-02 17:54:52 -0400 · Flag
Notice all the cheap shots that Sean took at Ed in his reason why he won’t debate him. Reminds me of a kid I knew growing up he would yell insults at you and when you would go up to confront him he would run inside the house and continue his insults, so brave.
Bob Roberts commented 2013-11-02 15:01:50 -0400 · Flag
Who would be the moderator……..Hasselbeck or Wretched Gretchen?
mlp ! commented 2013-11-02 11:49:03 -0400 · Flag
A debate between these two would be senseless. IMHO, There ain’t a stage big enough to fit the egos of both of these guys at the same time.
Yeah, I know….Ed Schultz is sometimes the only person who says the things that need to be said. I just wish he didn’t keep reminding us of that.
doors17 commented 2013-11-02 11:07:33 -0400 · Flag
He’ll never do it. He has nothing to gain. As long as Sean leads Ed in the ratings he won’t want to risk losing since Sean can stay nice and cozy on his throne in his right wing Wonderland.

This is just like last month when Robert Reich challenged Bill O’Reilly to a debate.
truman commented 2013-11-02 09:27:30 -0400 · Flag
Slanthead KKKlannity has not changed his shtick in all of his years on Fux Noise. Same bully boy. Same tired talking points. Same cowardice when confronted with his lies.
Antoinette commented 2013-11-02 04:43:51 -0400 · Flag
Hannocchio the RINO is a worn-out record. You would be shocked to see him in person. The age lines on his face is more prominent, and his hair is mostly gray. He looks 10 years older than his actual age of 51. The stress has taken its toll on this man.

The Stop Hannity Express says Hannocchio is a coward. He talks big, but when he’s challenged he hides underneath his desk. Ed Schultz can easily sweep the floor with this aging, tired old media hack.

The Express encourages the masses to go on social media, radio and television 24/7, and tell the world that Hannocchio is too scared to debate Ed Schultz. Target his conservative audience and tell them their hero is a coward. Offended, they will demand Hannocchio debate Schultz. If he refuses to debate Schulz, then his conservative audience will write him off as a coward, and seek another conservative talker with guts.

Maybe Hannocchio fears that Schulz would expose his hidden secrets. Hannocchio would pass out cold on the floor if a few of them became public knowledge, which they will anyway in time-with the help of our media partners.

Coming down the pipe:

1. Hannocchio did what????!!!!

2. The Elite Washington GOP Power Machine cuts ties with Hannocchio

3. A private issue becomes public knowledge

4. Fox “News” in full damage control when this hits the fan.

NOTE TO HANNITY

You are an embarrassment to your children. We feel sorry that they have a cowardly father.
Aria Prescott commented 2013-11-02 04:29:54 -0400 · Flag
I agree, Jane… Hannity was never a good commentator, but when he had a centrist or a liberal in the room, he at least tried to have an edge. I think the point where he quit even trying was when Colmes started the navel gazing, like it was his job to say anything other than what made him an on-set example of Hannity’s BS.
Jane S commented 2013-11-02 02:04:27 -0400 · Flag
Hannity is a worn-out shell of his former self, judging by about a week’s worth of his TV show. Purely from a TV performance perspective, the worst thing that ever happened to him was being given his own show by himself. Colmes wasn’t close to anybody’s ideal liberal champion, but he kept Hannity at least minimally on his toes.

These days, Hannity’s show is the same people delivering the same right-wing rants on the same topics over and over and over and over again, night after night. And the more of them at one time, the better because then he only needs to stand back, interrupt occasionally to shout somebody down he doesn’t agree with, but otherwise just stand back and let his right-wing guests rant away and eat up air time for him.

IOW, Hannity is in no shape to hold his own one-on-one with anybody on any subject. He’s become lazy and repetitive and feeble. It’s really kind of shocking. He’s always been a gigantic jerk, but he used to have a fair amount of juice. It’s almost all gone now. He’ll be lucky if he gets another contract on Fox News, IMO.
Joe Marsh commented 2013-11-02 01:25:46 -0400 · Flag
Would anyone here seriously expect Slanthead (Schultz’s favorite label for Hannity, BTW) to accept that challenge?

Not only is Schultz much bigger than Hannity, but he can shout a lot louder (regularly pinning the ol’ VU meter). It would be comical to watch Slanthead squirm trying to get a word in, let alone try to put Schultz down with his bullyboy routine.

(The only way Hannity could possibly defeat Schultz would be to resort to physical violence by emptying the clips in both of the concealed Glocks he carries all the time.)


Others in the media, and not on the left, are turning on Slanthead as he spirals into the toilet (Did everyone see the latest ratings, showing Kelly drawing about a million more viewers at 9 p.m. than Hannity ever did?).

Just the other day, Don Imus — who’s anything but a paradigm of virtue (“nappy-headed hos”) — called Hannity a “loser.” Imus was warning some woman — didn’t catch her name or whether she is one of his regular crew of obnoxious sycophants (as anyone who’s listened to Imus surely knows, his four hours on the air on WABC each morning sounds like one long hangover; mumbling, slurred incomplete sentences). Anyway, Imus was warning her not to go on one of Slanthead’s panels because “he’s a loser!”

I’m proud to say I almost managed to go the whole week without listening to a minute of Slanthead on his radio hatecast. Except today, caught the last 30 minutes of so, as Hannity was doing his best to rehab his good buddy the Donald by giving time to a Trump mouthpiece to denounce the “university” fraud.

Yawn!
Ellen commented 2013-11-02 01:25:23 -0400 · Flag
It worked for me just now. The ad was wonky but Ed was OK.
Hulk commented 2013-11-02 00:16:22 -0400 · Flag
No sound.
NewsHounds posted about Hannity Refuses Ed Schultz's Challenge To Debate on NewsHounds' Facebook page 2013-11-01 23:58:43 -0400
Hannity stands by his attacks on Schultz with the same integrity with which he stood by his pledge to be waterboarded for charity.








or sign in with Facebook or email.
Follow @NewsHounds on Twitter
Subscribe with RSS


We’ve updated our Privacy Policy
Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Created with NationBuilder