Is Fox's river of misinformation a result of omission (bad research teams) or commission (deliberate withholding of vital facts)? Reason I'm asking is that Tucker Carlson recently pimped a typical persecuted Christian story (and some anti-choice agitprop) without adding that it all ended happily ever after!

Fox News host Andrea Tantaros accused Preident Obama of making us more vulnerable to terrorism because he expressed support for a 14 year-old Muslim boy who was handcuffed, arrested and suspended after he brought a home-made clock to school.

With more than one half hour to go in the CNN Republican candidate's debate, Sean Hannity decided it was time enough to decide who won.

Ann Coulter attacked the Republican candidates for pandering to the “f***ing Jews” during their debate. So, naturally, she got some friendly face time with Megyn Kelly afterward.

Are you watching either of tonight's debates? If so, share your thoughts after the jump.

Fox News' Outnumbered show formed a pre-debate cheering squad to blunt conservative attacks on “exciting,” “inspiring” and “winner” Donald Trump. 

Bill O’Reilly spent nearly six minutes fear mongering about the refugee crisis, offering no solutions and exploiting the mess to suggest we're all doomed, mostly because of President Obama.

Sean Hannity purported to host a debate on the refugee crisis but it was clear his only real interest was in exploiting prejudice and frightening Americans into thinking that accepting refugees means allowing ISIS welfare queens into the country.

Despite Bureau of Labor statistics showing that Seattle gained food service jobs after raising its minimum wage to $15 an hour, Fox keeps telling its viewers jobs were lost there.

Bill O’Reilly thinks that Donald Trump’s sexist attacks on women are “small ball” because real women, I mean Republican women don’t worry their pretty little heads about it.