In Fox's latest ridiculous effort to pretend Donald Trump is a serious pundit, Greta Van Susteren hosted him last night (1/18/12) for a double session in which she treated Trump – whose only real business experience is in real estate – as an expert on the Keystone pipeline, the related environmental issues, the 2012 presidential election, Snooki and - my personal favorite – Iran.
Trump's credibility problem isn’t only a lack of expertise in these areas. The record he does have is seriously tainted. There are the debunked and discredited birther accusations; his inadvertent admissions of racism; that big investigation in Hawaii into President Obama’s birth certificate Trump boasted about and suddenly clammed up about just around the time Obama released his long-form birth certificate. Plus, there was his disingenuous insistence on The O’Reilly Factor that he was hosting a Republican candidates’ debate – one night before he announced otherwise. And now there’s another make-believe possibility that this time he really will run for president.
Trump opined first on President Obama’s decision to reject the Keystone pipeline. “We certainly should have approved it…It is not an environmental problem at all - in any way, shape or form… We don’t even need Canadian oil if we do it right.” he said. Since when did Trump become an expert on energy? Or the environment?
Van Susteren challenged several of his assertions throughout their lengthy discussion but she never gave the viewers any of the many, many reasons they should take everything this guy says with several grains of salt.
After dispatching the pipeline issue, Van Susteren next elevated Trump to the level of foreign affairs expert and asked what he thought of the United States possibly engaging in talks with Iran. That’s a good thing, he opined. “That doesn’t show weakness. That shows in a way, strength. We should have talks with Iran.”
We ought to do everything possible to avoid another war, Trump offered. Then, having gone a few minutes without a boast, he added gratuitously, “Nobody’s more into the military than Donald Trump.” Well, maybe except for those who – unlike Trump – have actually served in it
As if all that were not enough undeserved cred, Van Susteren went on to ask, “What would you be saying to Ahmadinejad if you were president, having those talks?” As if that would EVER happen!
Who needs a State Department when you’ve got a guy like Trump on hand? Iran is a piece of cake for him! “I’m sure that if they have the right negotiator, which I’m sure they don’t have, we can make an unbelievable deal.” Trump assured Van Susteren that the talks would not have to take so long that they would serve as a stalling tactic for Iran to complete a nuclear weapon. “You can know at the end of a day whether or not they’re going to work. When I go into a deal, I know almost immediately if a deal is going to happen,” he said.
In Part 2, Trump offered his insights into the presidential race. “They’re giving each other the campaign slogans for the Obama administration.” But fear not, Fox viewers. Obama is “doing so badly,” the Republicans “have plenty on him.”
And Snooki! She “looks terrific.”
The South Carolina primary “is going to be very close,” the oracle of birtherism revealed. Romney has been hurt by the attacks on him “but he’ll come back.”
What would Trump advise Romney about releasing his tax returns? Release them, Trump said. I'm sure campaign staffers rushed right out to Kinko's the moment the words were uttered from Trump's lips.“All over the world they laugh at us,” Trump told Van Susteren, as some kind of proof that we need to get rid of President Obama. But here’s a newsflash for Trump: When a national news network keeps promoting a huckster as some kind of major pundit, who could blame them for laughing?
Truman : I think maybe Meatloaf,the Situation and Gary Busey probably have a better grasp of things than Trump does,truth be told.
Then, having gone a few minutes without a boast, he added gratuitously, âNobodyâs more into the military than Donald Trump.â
Why, Donald? You owe them money, too?
Ellen, you left out a very important question: If we don’t need Canadian oil, then why do we need the Keystone pipeline at all? Wasn’t the whole (alleged) point of its being built to bring CANADIAN oil into the US? Maybe I missed the part of the Keystone debate where the pipeline was NOT going to be used to transport Canadian oil to US destinations. Or maybe the Donald missed the part of the debate discussing who owns the pipeline. (If it weren’t for a CANADIAN company trying to get CANADIAN tar sand oil to the US, there wouldn’t be a pipeline. But then, no one ever accused the Donald of being the brightest bulb in the room. Hell, Snooki—or any of the Jersey Shore cast—might do better than the Donald on an IQ test.)
We ought to do everything possible to avoid another war, Trump offered.”
Well, you just lost the teabagger war loving “pro-life” vote, tRump.
âAll over the world they laugh at us,â Trump told VanCesspool"
No, tRump. All over the world they laugh at YOU, dumbass.
Look at me, I’m already a winner!
And then Ahmadinejad would really disrespect the US.
That’s just stupid. And wasteful besides.
Does This Document Make Me ELIGIBLE to be POTUS? (or get a passport to go on a Dream Cruise?)
Here is my birth certificate. No, wait that isnât true. To be accurate I need to say, âHere is a scanned copy of my alleged âCERTIFICATE OF VITAL RECORDâ that has not been vetted by qualified forensic document examiners.â
Scanned documents aren’t valid evidence of anything even if they are legitimate. The entire reason there is a professional field known as forensic document examination is that a great deal can be told from examination of the original document itself. Much, much less can be told by looking at a photocopy of a document and very little, if anything at all, can be told from looking at a digital image that purports to be an image of an original document. Too much opportunity for adulteration, no opportunity to examine the paper, the ink, and any impressions made on the paper, etc. These online arguments discussing images are like people studying animals by examining imitation scat.
The documents Obama would like the public to accept would not meet the standards of “evidence” in any court of law, any administrative hearing, any congressional investigation, application for any license, passport. or official ID papers
We the People will never know if Obama is a fraud unless the original documents are submitted to a panel of court approved certified document examiners. Certified Diplomate, American Board of Forensic Document Examiners
Full Story Here: http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2011/05/eligibility-any-image-offered-on.html
Who put these two freaks together?
Nobody on Fux saw the train wreck coming?!??
Yup, Donald. You certainly showed them gNOpigs.
Well, since pizza is now a vegetable…
âWhat would you be saying to Ahmadinejad if you were president, having those talks?â
I have a team of investigators in Hawaii and you wouldn’t believe what they have uncovered in Tehran.