Sarah Palin’s brother and father went all Tagg Romney on Hannity last night as her brother revealed that there have been times when “I’ve had to hold him back from going after some of these people” that have attacked her verbally. Oh, and her father also indirectly said Palin lied in her book.
In case you missed it, Sarah Palin’s father and brother, Chuck Heath, Sr. and Chuck Heath, Jr., have a new book out about her and they’ve been making regular appearances on Fox News to promote it. Last night was the Hannity show’s turn.
First off, her father pegged her as a liar for saying in her book that she didn’t take the eyeballs of the moose (I kid you not) her Dad handed her when they went hunting together before school. “I handed them to her and in her book she said that she didn’t take ‘em. But I saw her take ‘em,” Daddy Chuck said.
After a round of laughter, Hannity asked how they deal with “the smears, the attacks, the names.” He meant the ones toward poor widdle Sarah, not the ones that are her stock in trade.
Brother Chuck said:
We’ve been listening to this for the last four years… It never stops and there’s been times when literally, I’m not kidding, I’ve had to hold him back from going after some of these people that, with the profanity and, you know, they’re hanging on these lies and doing their best to destroy her. It’s been real tough.
Do you think Hannity evidenced even a smidgen of concern that his guest had considered assaulting someone for engaging in what Hannity would have surely called free speech had it been a conservative criticizing a liberal candidate? Let’s just say he showed the same concern as when another guest announced that most blacks in Tennessee are racists. In other words, none.
That explains why you failed to understand, â2010 Election Results: 33 won, 20 lost, 1 undecided.â Duh.
Explains why I failed to understand? You’re the one who asked for the source, after I said barely half of Palin’s 2010 endorsements won their races.
I think Viz is right — you already said you were “done here,” perhaps you should come back when you’ve completed the sixth grade . . .
.
“Again, you show your lack of basic math skills. The Whore Of Babble-On endorsed 64 total candidates in 2010, only 33 won.” Wrong. Cite your sources.
Here you go:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/politics/palin_tracker/
Should be easy to follow — it’s got pictures.
“People vent. They shoot heir mouths off, they call others names. Who cares?”
You do — when something’s said about your precious Sarah.
“Someone like Hannity might say Obama is a liar and a socialist, but thatâs not the same as Bill Maher calling Palin a twat or Letterman saying inappropriate things about a teenaged girl.”
But it IS the same as Rush Limpballs calling Michelle Obama “The First Linebacker” and “Moo-shelle,” and Ted Nugent saying he may be in prison if President Obama is reelected.
Do YOU get it?
.
I could not care less about anonymous comments from a Fox site as it’s no better than the hateful bashing here. People vent. They shoot heir mouths off, they call others names. Who cares?
MY POINT is about famous and influential people (whether political pundits, actors, comedians, or rock stars) spewing vile language about those they are opposed to. Someone like Hannity might say Obama is a liar and a socialist, but that’s not the same as Bill Maher calling Palin a twat or Letterman saying inappropriate things about a teenaged girl. You get it?
And unlike many of the so-called “sock puppets” here… I’ve used my real name.
Good night, God bless, and may your candidate lose with dignity in November.
P.S. I am NOT a fan of Romney and I am NOT a registered Republican. However, I do deeply believe that the Barry-Biden team needs to pack their bags.
Again, you show your lack of basic math skills.
The Whore Of Babble-On endorsed 64 total candidates in 2010, only 33 won.
In basic math, that’s BARELY ABOVE 50% — not a “vast majority.”
“Take your liberal bunk and smoke it. By the way, Iâm done here. I only stopped by to see what kind of garbage was being spewed about Palin.”
TRANSLATION: I’ve earned my 5 cents/post for the day; I’ll be back tomorrow (under a different sockpuppet name, of course.)
“This web siteâs motto, âWe watch Fox so you donât have to!â LOL Typical. A site for lazy liberals whom only parrot nonsense.”
Well, since this site only “parrots” what’s broadcast on Fox, you’re right about it being nonsense.
You’re finally getting it.
.
Byrd of West Virginia was HARDLY a conservative. Get real. Oh, by the way…your patron saint of Civil Rights? Martin Luther King, Jr. was a REPUBLICAN. And Democrat Johnson’s “Great Society” did more HARM to minorities than good.
Take your liberal bunk and smoke it. By the way, I’m done here. I only stopped by to see what kind of garbage was being spewed about Palin.
This web site’s motto, “We watch Fox so you don’t have to!” LOL Typical. A site for lazy liberals whom only parrot nonsense.
Again, you show your ignorance. You have no clue as to her power and influence. Palin was largely responsible for the GOP and certain “TEA Party” candidates gaining control of the House in 2010. The vast majority of her endorsements WON. She has continued giving speeches, fundraising, and making endorsements all through the current campaign.
You also fail to understand that Palin wasn’t only targeted by liberals and Democrats, she is a threat to the GOP Elite as well. She challenges the status quo and the crony capitalism permeating both parties.
Keep in mind, she is still quite young at 48 and has plenty of time to seek The White House if and when she sees fit to run. Meanwhile, her presence on the political scene cannot be denied.
If you don’t agree with her ideology, that’s fine. But the blatant insults serve no purpose. Grow up.
“Further, if you liberal media types and bloggers hate Palin so much why do you keep writing about her and insinuating that sheâs a has-been? Because⦔
. . . 1) She — or in this case, her family — keeps injecting her in the news cycle, and 2) Faux sNooze, whom this blog monitors {as it’s tagline attests}, keeps using her for “expert commentary” on matters she has no expertise on {which is just about everything.}
“Face it, after 4 years of non-stop bashing, name-calling, character assassination, lies, misrepresentations, and pure hate⦠she is still here.”
Yes, she is still here . . . running her mouth. She isn’t doing anything else; she’s not serving in any political office, and appears not to have any other job, other than the one Fox pays her for — to run her mouth.
And apparently, even just running her mouth isn’t paying off all the time — as evidenced by the RNC’s non-invite to the GOP convention . . . it appears her only purpose these days is to feed verbal diarrhea to her willing, accepting fans . . . like you.
.
@mj â Keith, I dare YOU to wade over to FoxNation.comâs comments â¦
I betcha keith is a regular at the FokkksNashun cesspool and is very comfortable with the hatred and filth that resides there also and too ya betcha.
Amazing isnât it. The racist pigs at FokkksNashun call the First Lady a cât and all the nasty names their tiny diseased minds can come up with, and we donât hear from any of the trolls, like keith, "
You just love lumping in the “KKK” nonsense with conservatives when, in fact, the KKK was started by Democrats. I bet you didn’t know that Planned Parenthood was started by a woman seeking to eliminate minorities.
Just read your own language, hypocrite. You liberals always call people names. Not very tolerant, are you? It’s impossible to debate issues and common sense with someone so ignorant to facts that they resort to vicious verbal and written attacks.
Do you even KNOW what the likes of Madonna, Bill Maher, Sharon Osbourne, Joy Behar, Whoopie Goldberg, Louis C.K., John Cleese, and many other celebrities have said about Palin? Believe me, it’s far worse than anything said about the First Lady.
Further, if you liberal media types and bloggers hate Palin so much why do you keep writing about her and insinuating that she’s a has-been? Because… 1. Headlines about her get you readers and 2. she’s a rock star with MUCH influence and power.
Face it, after 4 years of non-stop bashing, name-calling, character assassination, lies, misrepresentations, and pure hate… she is still here.
EPIC FAIL on your part.
You’re clueless.
“The bias in this story and the nastiness in many of the comments proves how intolerant and full of hate the left happens to be.”
ZZZzzz . . .
Only on Planet Wingnut is calling an attention-seeking incompetent [Sarah Palin] an attention-seeking incompetent considered “hate.”
Keith, I dare YOU to wade over to FoxNation.com’s comments section on an article — any article — note how much hatred they have for anyone who disagrees with them, and how many times they’ve called for President Obama’s assassination . . . then, get back to us on intolerance and hatred.
.
âOur Sarah: Made in Alaskaâ is a
There, Twatty/pRick, fixed it.
.
Chuck Heath wants to physically assault his daughter’s critics, his son had to hold him back. Still waiting for his “I did it for the lulz!” rehab.
Same game, different names.
Additionally, can you imagine the OUTRAGE from the rightwingnut noisemakers if Malia or Sasha Obama had said something similar? (The Obama Children are violent and uncontrollable!!)
.
As for the “nitwit” comment, you do know the old saying about the pot and the kettle, right?
.