Maybe TDS writers visit NewsHounds and loved the headline so they poached it. LOL

ROFLMFAO…Snow Snooki questioning someone else’s intelligence….oh man…gotta catch my breath and wipe the tears from my eyes.

Man it was tough between Ablow and West but I had to give the nod to Ablow. This man is a disgrace to the mental health profession peddling the crap he does.

This one wins the Outrageous Comment of the Week award hands down.

Wasn’t it the bunch on Fox whining about the supposed assault by the Occupy guy on one of Fox’s “hit men” (Jesse Watters???). Now they want to instigate what they so vehemently decried? headslap oh I forgot we’re talking about Fox.

So let me get this stratight….the right claims this Administration is supposed to be ignorant and incompetent yet, the GOP hitsquad can’t unearth the Benghazi cover-up conspiracy after two attempts. What does that say about them? Nevermind…I answered my own question.

Bolling would be fileted. This is assuming Stewart could get a word in edgewise while being yelled over. Bolling takes his methods from Hannity.

This was another Stewart/TDS masterpiece.

U, I didn’t dismiss the Pew study.., that’s YOUR bias showing. I simply pointed out that an 8 week study during an election cycle is not indicative of an overall level of network bias as was the apparent contention of the OPINION piece in the Sun which cherry picked the parts of a Pew STUDY to fit the narrative. Re-read the highlighted part in my last post again where I further pointed out that even the Pew article itself put some context around the data which was ignored in the Sun piece by the…pardon me….“obviously Conservatively biased author”. Pew did call out MSNBC for the numbers during the 8 week study period that is true. I would like to see them do one now that the election is over and sample the same data. If that data bears out the contention of the Sun OPINION piece blanket statement that MSNBC is more biased than FOX I would concede the argument. As someone else pointed out, assuming Romney made a greater number of fallacious statement, those would be targeted by MSNBC (negative story) and ignored by Fox at best or spun in a positive light (zero or +1 positive). Anyway, get back to me when you get that new Pew STUDY so we can revisit the discussion.

I didn’t use code words for anything, a hack is a hack left or right, again that’s YOUR bias is showing being nit-picky as a diversion. When the Sun article author resorts to subtle name calling such as saying someone should change their title to Minister of Information and basically giving Fox a pass, yeah…that’s my clue he’s biased. Do you teach how to tell partisan opinion from unbiased fact, context, and the concept that correlation does not imply causation or to you simply tell the kids “Conservative good, Liberal bad” or whatever?

Also, I didn’t say a word about MSNBC not stumping for Democrats/Liberals. They do…so what? Fox stumps for the GOP yet claims fair and balanced which you and I both know is BS and you my friend are blind if you don’t see that. Any “Liberal” they have on any of their shows is outnumbered by orders of magnitude, talked over, shouted over and very seldom gets a word in edgewise. I know you’ll disagree.

Anyway, I look forward to your posting of the link to the new Pew study on media bias.

Vistor 55 — you forgot “Snow Snooki” also.