You know, it never ceases to amaze me how whiny and petty liberals are… You’re all bitching about how the female staff on Fox is dressed, but why aren’t you bitching about how much of a coward your President seems to be. Or, how he lies like a rug! Oh, if Bush did things like this, you’d be all over him like a crap filled diaper… But, you can’t say these things about Comrade Barack, can you? Nice to know that the ship of State is the Titanic… It’s unsinkable (yeah, right!!!)!

“Using female employees as sex toys to attract male viewers to a newscast is unethical.”

That’s true, and every news outfit that has the money to throw around does it, most definitely including CNN. MSNBC is on a different track and doesn’t care as much for their main people, but they’ve insisted on gussying up Maddow to the point where her on-air apppearance is wildly different from her normal appearance.

CNN has gotten rid of almost all of the wonderful, super-competent, mostly middle-aged, mostly non-spokesmodel types that used to populate their broadcasts except for Candy Crowley. Every single new female hire they’ve made to replace them over the last 7 or 8 years or more has been model gorgeous, and glammed up by the hair and make-up people to the max.

This is maybe triply true of local TV news. And then they wonder why there are so few women with enough “gravitas” to plausibly be major news anchors. Duh. They’ve stuffed the pipeline with models who can read a teleprompter, not news talent.

Oh.
I thought you meant panties.

Doors, if you put every nickel to all the slime that goes on behind-the-scenes of this fraudulent “network” you would be a very wealthy man.

When Roger Ailes demeaned the value of his female hosts and anchors, he actually said that Carlson wasn’t pretty enough to be on TV. When he was told that she was Miss America ’89, Ailes actually replied “Really? Must not have been a good year.”

Seriously- Say what you will about Carlson’s show, or how she looks now, but judging her onair value on her appearance, then saying every woman who was her age in 1989 must have been ugly for her to be Miss America is a level of sexism that boggles the mind. That’s the kind of comment you’d read on J$, not something a top-flight CEO and former political consultant would allow to slip out.

It’s an old familiar trick. When you have several channels has we do today and you’re channel surfing most heterosexual males will slam on the brakes when they see an attractive women. I plead guilty to falling for it too. It’s the same when I’m flipping the channels and I hear someone like Judge Judy or anyone yelling. I’m going to stop and find out what’s going on.

Back in the days of true news journalist like Walter Cronkite and many others from his generation, news divisions rarely made a profit and were not designed to. They were looked upon as a public service where the networks hoped to break even with the ads it did sell while promoting the networks programming for that evening.

One thing I do wonder about the allegations that Ailes offered producer Randi Harrison an additional $100 each week if she would agree to have sex with him is I wonder how many in the past and today have taken him up on his offer. Payments adjusted for inflation of course. If this is true it’s hard to accept that was the only time he attempted this, failed, and never tried again.

This paranoid cafeteria Catholic throws his weight around barking orders to his minions. The security-in their nice clean coat jackets-opens the glass door to this fool when he enters and exits Fox “News.” Not everyone can enter his Kingdom. The Fox “News” employees wear ID badges draped around their necks. It’s good to be King.

The reason for the Fox “News” ban on women’s slacks is for marketing purposes. Short skirts on these Barbies attracts the middle-age male viewers. The Nixon trainee, being a man himself, knows what men like to see. If it weren’t for this “marketing” ploy, Fox “News” would not be in the top spot in the ratings. To put it bluntly, sex sells. Ruthless Rupy knows this first hand.

These Barbies subject themselves as being used as sex toys, but they don’t care as long as the checks come in. The only difference between them and a street prostitute is the money. Yeah, we said it.

Wretchen Gretchen, Lizzy, Barbie Kelly, The Tortous, the Underwear Model, and the rest of the Ailes harem have no decency or ethics. Want to talk about war on women? Look at the Nixon trainee’s use of his female employees.

Using female employees as sex toys to attract male viewers to a newscast is unethical. Of course, the Nixon trainee knows nothing about ethics.

Dave, the message this clown Ailes is sending is sexism. This fraudulent “news” organization has been sued for gender discrimination by their own employees. This is not a work-friendly environment. There is more going on behind-the-scenes inside this horrid skyscraper. You, and the rest of the masses, will see for yourselves in the coming days.

NOTE TO AILES

Since you call yourself a “Roman Catholic” we decided to go this route.

Every time we see your fat face it reminds us of Revelation 13:1 – 13:18.

To refresh your memory:

“And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as [the feet] of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority.”

Dave,
I see your point, but what bothers me, as a woman, is this- you won’t see an unattractive woman on Fox ever. No Rachel Maddow, no Candy Crowley, etc. It sends the message that a woman is only of value if she is beautiful.
I see plenty of fb posts by my right wing men friends that boast that their women (conservative) are so much hotter than our women (liberal). As if that matters.
OK, you may be thinking that Michelle Malkin and Ann Coulter’s appearances on Fox disprove my first statement. Not sure I can explain that, but neither of them will have a show on Fox.
I just thought about Greta Van Susteren. Maybe I don’t have a point after all..

Some say that if you look up Retchin’s skirt, what you see will instantly turn you into stone.

I actually have no problem here. I am no fan of Gretchen but what she is being asked to do (or, in this case, wear) is not much different than what is done with, say, Brian Williams.

NBC doesn’t want him in a T-shirt and shorts doing the news.

This is show biz, folks. In this case, part of the biz is having good looking women wearing nice clothes. And, since the camera angles are part of the bit here, they will wear dresses that show off their legs. Ms. Carlson knew this going in and she seems fine with it.

I’d worry more about the content than how the message is delivered. The latter is playing right into Ailes’ hands.

Hopefully not “commando”.

Gretchen Carlson Still Not Wearing The Pants!