NewsHounds
We watch Fox so you don't have to!
  • Home
  • About
  • Naughty Corner
  • Forum
  • Archives
  • Blogroll
  • Donate
  • Shop
  • Contact
Home →

‘Regular Guys’ Hannity And LaPierre Whine About Those Hypocritical Elites Who Want Stronger Gun Laws

Posted by Ellen -459.20pc on January 18, 2013 · Flag

It was Gun Appreciation Day on Hannity tonight. And part of showing his appreciation was to help out NRA head and gun-rights martyr, Wayne LaPierre. LaPierre has not exactly been a popular guy lately, even in right wing circles. First, he came under criticism for his press conference after the Newtown school shootings, then for his subsequent Meet the Press appearance. Now he’s under attack for the NRA ad attacking President Obama’s gun proposals. But on Hannity, LaPierre was nothing but a regular Joe standing up for the rights of America’s other regular fellas under attack by gun-hating, hypocritical elites. UPDATED: The NRA lied and got a pass from Fox.

“You’re about to be Mitt Romney-ed,” Hannity told LaPierre, thereby setting him up for martyrdom. “They’re (the Obama administration) now running a political campaign against you and your organization.”

LaPierre was part of a one-hour gun special that included a “studio audience” of all like-minded people. They applauded when LaPierre said, “The American public is going to stand and fight for their freedom and the NRA is going to stand and fight with ‘em.”

It didn’t take long to get to the victimhood. The ever-suffering Hannity said:

We use armed guards to protect our elected politicians, our presidents, our mayors, our cabinet officials. We protect money in a bank. Hollywood stars, they hire Bo Dietl (a member of the audience), right? We have at courthouses, at stadiums, office buildings, airports, aren’t they all, they all have armed guards, right? Why were people attacking you for suggesting maybe retired police officers and military be put in schools to prevent this from happening?

LaPierre is, apparently, just as much a Special GOP Victim as his host:

It was ridiculous. I mean they attack me for opposing what doesn’t work, which is one more gun law and they attack me for opposing, for supporting what does work, which is school security. I mean, what it really boils down to is the sanctimonious hypocrisy of the political elites and the media elites in this country.

Well, you can’t get much more elite than these two: $970,000-a-year LaPierre and a multimillionaire radio/TV host. But I digress.

LaPierre continued:

Most of their kids, when they go to school, they’re protected by police in the school and armed security… A third of the schools in the country have armed security right now. When President Clinton proposed it years ago. And yet Wayne says, “Let’s make people safe” and they call me crazy, they – everything under the sun. Well, I could care less because what I’m proposing will make people safe. What they’re proposing won’t.

In Part 2, Hannity played the NRA’s hideous new ad targeting President Obama and his daughters. Hannity called it a “powerful ad but yet anything the NRA points out seems to just come under attack.”

LaPierre repeated his “media elite hypocrisy” whine and added, “What’s unfair is there are Moms and Dads all over this country getting up and sending their kids to school on Monday and Tuesday of next week that are praying that their kids come home safe. And we could immediately help protect those kids by putting armed security in school, the same armed security the elites have."

Of course, neither of these two rich gun lovers offered up any thoughts as to how public schools, already struggling with budget problems, should pay for those protections for “regular” children. Nor, as Jason Linkins noted in an excellent analysis of LaPierre's post-Newtown press conference, was the phrase "private-sector solution" ever uttered here, either.

UPDATE: It turns out the NRA's ad was flat-out wrong when it said the Obama daughters' school had armed guards. Where was the Fox News fact checking?


Do you like this post?
Tweet
submit to reddit

Showing 17 reactions



    Review the site rules
alison wonderland commented 2013-01-20 12:56:55 -0500 · Flag
The founding fathers could not have imagined the technology we have today and the constant new challenges that our society and country as a whole face regularly….if the original constitution was so perfect….why do we have amendments? No individuals need military weapons…the founding fathers had muskets….no one person could shoot dozens in a minute…be realistic…you only have two hands….how many guns can you hold?
Visitor 55 commented 2013-01-20 12:26:51 -0500 · Flag
@cb squid. We are not fearful of the NRA or FoxGOPTV. You’ve imagined that. They don’t scare us. Idiots who believe FoxGOPTV lies and misinformation concern me.

The rest of your screed is nothing but right-wing bullshit. Assault Weapons has a clear definition. Go find it. Stop believing what you hear on FoxGOPTV. Sounds like you’re the one who is afraid to cross the NRA and FoxGOPTV.
CBSQuidSS A commented 2013-01-20 09:24:07 -0500 · Flag
I am neither Far Left nor Far Right, but have grown up shooting for fun – but as fearful you people are of the NRA and FOX News, I am worried that much about you. Making new laws banning this or that does what exactly? Last I checked, it is illegal to carry any gun into a school, as well as other public places when posted, so what are more laws going to do? Look at your posts here – very childish, with personal attacks and subjective nonsense, which makes you just as bad as those you hate.
BTW, one of the big issues that you grab onto is the BS the media is feeding you – define “Assault Rifle/Weapon” accurately and NONE of the “Semi-Automatic Rifles” used in shootings would be covered. They are simply “Semi-Automatic Rifles” which look mean and scary to you, so they need to be banned or controlled because your media tells you so.
On the flip side, if we start re-defining our Constitutional Amendments (or trying to define when the founding fathers meant) then I figure maybe we should start limiting freedom of speech (the founding fathers could not have anticipated small minded people like you on with unlimited access to the internet) and certainly babies born to illegal immigrants in the USA should not be USA citizens. Start hacking up our rights and you have no idea where it will stop… fairly recent history might give you a glimpse of what happens when the government gets too controlling…
alison wonderland commented 2013-01-19 20:50:42 -0500 · Flag
@mark Cioci All Presidents children have Secret Service protection…both parties! It is a national security issue…what does Bristol Palin have to do with the current gun issue? Why don’t you mention birthers if you want to reference election games? Buying guns legally and safely does not diminish the 2nd amendment….being crazed about your guns….now that’s scary!
Mark Cioci commented 2013-01-19 19:56:15 -0500 · Flag
It’s Ok for obama to exploit kids at his news conference, but don’t anyone dare expose the truth about his children being guarded by secret service guards with assault rifles!!!
The democrats and Obama seem to forget how they attacked Sara Palin’s daughter for having a child out of wedlock when Sarah ran for vice pres.!!!
Wayne is 100% correct when he says Obama and his croniesare only out to take away our 2nd amendmet rights!!!
mj - the same one commented 2013-01-19 14:15:21 -0500 · Flag
“We have at courthouses, at stadiums, office buildings, airports, aren’t they all, they all have armed guards, right? Why were people attacking you for suggesting maybe retired police officers and military be put in schools to prevent this from happening?”

Because we don’t want to give up our freedoms, Sean:

http://thepoliticalcarnival.net/2013/01/14/cartoons-of-the-day-new-school-security/securitymeasures2/

@truman & Kent Brockman: Mittens was last seen pumping his own gas in La Jolla:

http://investorplace.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/romney6666.jpg

Quite a comedown for the onetime Bain Capital Master of the Universe; next thing you know, he’ll be forced to drive his own car into his own auto elevator . . .

.
alison wonderland commented 2013-01-19 12:27:02 -0500 · Flag
@visitor55. Great link! Thanks!
alison wonderland commented 2013-01-19 12:20:41 -0500 · Flag
Did Hannity allow his audience to all carry concealed weapons on this “special pro-gun” show? Just asking….
truman commented 2013-01-19 10:20:44 -0500 · Flag
@kent Brockman. I was also wonderingwhat Mitt (or was it Matt or Mutt?) would say about this issue. For months, Fux Noise would hang on every word that Mitt uttered as if it came directly from some diety like God or Saint Ronnie Raygun. Then one day in November, he disappeared. Some say that he is wandering around a La Jolla mansion in his magic underwear reading from some gold-plated books. Quite a comedown for a guy who used to get daily blowjobs from KKKlannity.
Visitor 55 commented 2013-01-19 09:19:02 -0500 · Flag
@richardson Peterson. Yep. I saw a poll of NRA members and about 68% of them agree that we need stricter gun laws and enforcement of gun regulations. So when LaPussie claims that the vast majority of Americans are in sync with the NRA’s beliefs, he’s under the delusion that the NRA is in sync with his regressive extremist beliefs. Obviously they aren’t. And the NRA would be smart to kick the slimy corrupt bastard LaPussie and the extremists like him out of their organization.
Visitor 55 commented 2013-01-19 09:09:26 -0500 · Flag
Poor Whyne LaPussie. He’s upset because he’s not getting the praise and worship he feels he deserves from all the little people in Murikkka.

Hey LaPussie, did you see this, you dumbphuck?

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2013/01/18/1469231/armed-school-guard-leaves-gun-in-student-bathroom/

Yep. That’s the wet dream of the NRA come true. This is only the start. What will LaPussie say when a kid gets a hold of a gun that an armed school guard left in the student bathroom and shoots himself or another kid? That the other kid should have had a gun too?

And by the way, kkklannity and LaPussie, President Obama does not want to ban all guns. Only your stupid mindless sheep are believing that lie.
Richard Peterson commented 2013-01-19 09:04:04 -0500 · Flag
What a joke this Hannity episode is. Hannity and LaPierre are far right wing hacks just like the “huge” studio audience of 9 or 10 people. LaPierre claims that the “vast majority” of the American people are in sync with the NRA. Garbage! The vast majority of NRA members disagree with LaPierre’s gun control views. Sanctimonious Hannity loves his guns because they represent the backbone (and likely other body parts) he lacks. The far right tactic is to lie and lie and lie. After a few repetitions of the lie, the right wing hacks have convinced themselves that it’s true and that all real Americans believe it, too. It’s time for honest, dues paying NRA members to stand up and revolt against the insanity of the LaPierres and Nugents of the world.
bemused commented 2013-01-19 03:46:44 -0500 · Flag
PS: I’d ban handguns, too, or – compromise warning – limit their number to the number of hands in the possession of the prospective owner.

(For the trolls: “hand”-gun, get it?).

The vast majority of homocides, suicides and fatal accidents (aka kids found Daddy’s gun on the coffee table) are attributed to pistols and such like. And the killing rate in the USA is four times that of the UK and six times that of Germany. That should tell us all something, no?
bemused commented 2013-01-19 03:40:42 -0500 · Flag
Antoinette wrote: “The NRA’s only concern is their reputation, not the lives of innocent children. LaPierre makes the Grinch seemed tamed.”

While I agree that the NRA couldn’t care less about kids, I’m rather more inclined to believe that their main concern – as representatives of gun manufacturers – is money. Both Truthout and Crooks and Liars have had articles on the fact (a no brainer, actually) that guns don’t wear out or become too tattered to wear . That means that the only way to keep on selling them is to develop new and increasingly deadlier versions.

Thanks to the NRA and a population briefly flush with cash, having a shotgun for hunting has morphed into a totally fabricated demand for a full arsenal that would include a mini-nuke if those were available.
Antoinette commented 2013-01-19 03:27:14 -0500 · Flag
LaPierre is a incompetent NRA mouthpiece, with poor leadership skills. He couldn’t run a merry-go-round.

LaPierre’s appearance on High End Hannocchio’s declining show is strictly damage control. Hannocchio, as expected, threw softball questions.

Tell that idiot LaPierre that the gunman who murdered those innocent children was not a gang member in Chicago, but a upper-middle class confused kid with serious problems. That kid that shot movie-goers in Colorado was not a gang member either. Both of them had assault weapons.

The NRA’s only concern is their reputation, not the lives of innocent children. LaPierre makes the Grinch seemed tamed.

The Stop Hannity Express says a studio audience is not going to stop Hannocchio’s declining ratings. The masses, including some conservatives, have stopped listening to him. And it’s going to get worse in the next few months.

NOTE TO LAPIERRE

Obama is talking about banning assault weapons, not handguns, you paranoid idiot.

NOTE TO HANNITY

You are losing your mojo. You are no longer influential in America. A growing percentage of conservatives are on to you.
Kent Brockman commented 2013-01-19 02:42:37 -0500 · Flag
What would Mitt have said about this? Mitt, Mitt, M-I-t-t, Miiiiiiiiiiiiiiitt …
NewsHounds posted about ‘Regular Guys’ Hannity And LaPierre Whine About Those Hypocritical Elites Who Want Stronger Gun Laws on NewsHounds' Facebook page 2013-01-19 00:53:46 -0500
Somebody call a wah-mbulance!
blog advertising is good for you






or sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Subscribe with RSS

Make Custom Gifts at CafePress


Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Created with NationBuilder