NewsHounds
We watch Fox so you don't have to!
  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Forum
  • Blogroll
  • Donate
  • Shop
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
Home →

Scalia’s Son: Overturning Roe ‘Would Actually Be Good For Democracy’

Posted by Brian -5pc on May 09, 2022 · Flag

The son of former Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, Christopher, Scalia joined in the Fox News meme of pretending that the likely overturning of Roe v. Wade is no biggie.

Before getting to Christopher Scalia, host Neil Cavuto suggested that, despite the leaked draft opinion stating that Roe “must be overruled,” maybe the court isn’t really about to overturn Roe. “It really depends on how you interpret that and whether that really is what’s in this draft opinion,” Cavuto said.

Cavuto kissed up to Scalia: “You know, your dad was such a gifted writer and by the way, you’re no slouch in that department yourself.”

Cavuto set the stage for the “no biggie” talking points by “asking” if Justice Scalia thought it best if abortion were “not left with the court” to decide. Never mind that Republicans are already looking to enact a nationwide ban on abortion.

Scalia claimed that overturning Roe “would actually be good for democracy.” Ignoring how the Supreme Court is about to remove a right that has been in place for almost 50 years, he added, “I know a lot of Democrats are saying otherwise, that this deals a terrible blow for democracy, but that’s not the case at all. This issue belongs in the hands of the people, not the justices.”

Except the justices are poised to take away an important right, one that is supported by a majority of Americans (by a roughly 2-1 margin), and put it in the hands of at least 18 states run by Republicans who, ignoring the majority’s views, will ban abortion once the Supreme Court’s decision becomes official.

But Scalia continued with his “we’re just making it democratic” BS: “So if this is the end result, I think my father obviously would have been very pleased with it. Overturning Roe does not mean banning abortion across America, as many people seem to believe. It means that people actually get to vote on the issue, which is how it should be.”

Cavuto timidly noted that if “the draft becomes the reality, the fear among those who are pro-choice, as you know, as your father probably knew, that it could move a number of states to ban it outright and that could be a problem itself.” It’s not that overturning Roe could move those states, we already know it will. Already, about 58% of American women of reproductive age, 40 miilion, live in states that are hostile to abortion.

“The judges can’t really worry about that,” Scalia said. “They need to be focused on the jurisprudence of the decision.”

Cavuto lent his support. He claimed that the Supreme Court "often has gone against precedent," thus pooh-poohing “this idea that the court never, never goes against precedent."

But the Supreme Court has never before removed an existing, established constitutional right.

This episode fits into the Fox pattern of downplaying the effects of overturning Roe v. Wade. You can watch it below, from the May 7, 2022 Cavuto Live.

Follow @NewsHounds


Do you like this post?
Tweet

Showing 4 reactions



    Review the site rules
Thx4 Fish commented 2022-05-10 15:56:46 -0400 · Flag
Taking away a right that women have had for 50 years, and putting it to a vote. Yea, we women are just giddy with the idea of “democratically” having the entire country vote on our bodily autonomy. That’s roughly a 50-50 ratio of men and women. But wait! Is it just elected officials who will vote on this women’s right? Scratch that, in my state men make up 73% of elected legislators, so really, its just men that get to decide. I guess its not really democracy after all.
Bemused commented 2022-05-10 11:12:09 -0400 · Flag
These idiots would like nothing better than to imitate the Taliban by reversing women’s rights bit by bit. Like the Taliban, they really resent women being anything other than passive beasts of reproduction.

Almost immediately after taking over, the Taliban barred Afgan women from working, from going to school beyond 6th grade, from being caught outside the home without a male relative, from appearing on entertainment shows of all kinds, and from a whole slew of other things that they’d been able to experience for a couple of decades (at least in the cities). Last week’s decree requiring all women to cover themselves from head to toe (the burqa) is icing on the cake. And it will probably be effective because any woman who may protest will do so at risk of sending her father, husband or brother to jail. Namely the only legally authorised breadwinner for her and her children. Can’t get any more cruel than that.

Although Margaret Atwood’s “The Handmaid’s Tale” was not intended to be a prediction of a possible future, it’s looking more and more like a forecast. Time for women all over the world to rise up and raise holy hell!
Steve St John commented 2022-05-09 10:35:10 -0400 · Flag
So 1/6 was no big deal, and this is good for democracy. Big Brother is here.
truman commented 2022-05-09 09:29:38 -0400 · Flag
The hyper-partisan cabal of five right-wing Justices is just getting started. Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett will now reverse long-standing precedents that conflict with their ideology.








or sign in with Facebook or email.
Follow @NewsHounds on Twitter
Subscribe with RSS


We’ve updated our Privacy Policy
Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Created with NationBuilder