NewsHounds
We watch Fox so you don't have to!
  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Forum
  • Blogroll
  • Donate
  • Shop
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
Home →

Rush Limbaugh Takes Over On The Record

Posted by Ellen -7842.60pc on August 01, 2013 · Flag

If you’re a regular On The Record watcher you know that the show frequently begins with a clip from Rush Limbaugh, even though Fox likes to tout host Greta Van Susteren as their liberal commentator. But on Tuesday (7/30/13), On The Record outdid itself with “balancing” Van Susteren’s liberal views: an entire hour of Limbaugh. Given how few questions Van Susteren asked, how she failed to challenge the conservative hate coming out of his mouth, it must have been like Christmas in July for Fox viewers. Think the “fair and balanced” network will be hosting Michael Moore or Jesse Jackson or Randi Rhodes for a full hour of spouting off on prime time? Don’t make me laugh!

Apparently, devoting the hour to Limbaugh wasn't enough. FoxNews.com showcased the segments, too. 

rush_on_on_the_record_greta.png      

Van Susteren introduced the first segment, which lasted more than 19 minutes, by saying, “In a rare interview, Rush tells us President Obama likes scandals.” Her first “question” to Limbaugh was little more than an invitation to attack Obama over one of her favorite memes: “President Obama says the scandals are phony. Why do you think he says they’re phony? Because he believes it? Or is there a strategy?”

That was also an opportunity for Limbaugh to promote his “Limbaugh Theorem” which Fox has been hyping. 

Limbaugh_theorem.png

The theorem is little more than an accusation that American voters ignorantly re-elected President Obama because they like him personally and didn’t pay attention to all those scandals the likes of Fox and their Republican allies have been doing their best to throw at him.

Here is a man whose policies have done great damage to this country (a banner on the screen helpfully repeated that line), policies that have done great damage to the economy, have done great damage to the American culture, to the American psyche. …And what has always amazed me is how he’s not attached to any of it. He has an agenda, he’s been implementing it. But what I call the low-information voters, who voted for him and other Democrats, do not associate Obama’s policies and agenda with the condition of the country. …That’s always befuddled me. I’ve never, never known a president to be immune from economic circumstances in an election as he was in 2012.

Limbaugh continued by saying, “It all became clear" to him after reading a New York Times article (yes, a New York Times article) that said most people disapprove of “the Obama agenda.”

My theory is that Obama has positioned himself as an outsider, not attached to anything that’s happening. What he has made happen, he positions himself as opposed to it and against it, and fighting for everybody else to overcome what he has done. And that’s one of the reasons why the constant campaign. So he doesn’t appear to be governing. So he doesn’t appear to be part of Washington. He appears to have this mysterious, powerful bunch of forces that are opposing him and stopping him from creating jobs. And stopping him from giving people proper healthcare. And stopping him from making their home values go up. And he’s constantly out there fighting it. And he does that by constantly campaigning and never seen to be governing.

There’s plenty you could criticize in President Obama’s governing style. But to accuse him of making up a “mysterious, powerful bunch of forces” blocking him is hardly credible given the Republicans’ obstructionism. Yet Van Susteren sat in rapt silence throughtout as though Limbaugh were some kind of political oracle.

 

Follow @NewsHounds

Follow @NewsHoundEllen


Do you like this post?
Tweet

Showing 18 reactions



    Review the site rules
Antoinette commented 2013-08-02 03:04:33 -0400 · Flag
Speaking of scandals, Rusty the Radio Clown was in a scandal of his own back in 2006. Let’s revisited his own troubles.

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/crime/rush-limbaughs-dominican-stag-party

Call all radio programs across the nation and remind the masses of his detainment over Viagra.
Ellen commented 2013-08-02 01:31:31 -0400 · Flag
Jane S., When Fox has been questioned about their all-conservative line up of hosts, they have pointed to Van Susteren as a liberal. Here’s another example, from O’Reilly http://mediamatters.org/research/2007/01/05/despite-touting-colmes-as-balance-hannity-to-ho/137655

And another one from Murdoch:
http://mediamatters.org/research/2008/12/15/fox-has-touted-colmes-co-hosting-duty-as-proof/146544

And guess what, everybody? Pt 2 of the Rush infomercial is Friday! He’s going to open up about his personal life!
Michael T commented 2013-08-01 21:14:29 -0400 · Flag
I only had to read Gretawire once including the results of her latest online poll to realize she not only has a conservative following, but she is a huge favorite among the Tea Party.
Kevin Koster commented 2013-08-01 20:31:14 -0400 · Flag
I’m greatly appreciative that Ellen has spotlit this unfortunate moment for Greta van Susteren. I’ve had moments of being rendered speechless by her choice to just let Rush Limbaugh vent out some of the angriest and most hateful comments I’ve heard – and he’s very consistent about doing it. Where are the hard questions about Limbaugh’s enthusiastic discussion of possible rioting in Florida? Where are the questions about his sinister comments about Sandra Fluke? Where are the challenges to the ridiculous assumptions he regularly makes about the motivations of President Obama and his staff?

Interviews like this must be pointed out, for all those who would consider van Susteren anything other than a right wing host who’s comfortable with even the most extreme rhetoric that Fox News can muster.
truman commented 2013-08-01 18:17:59 -0400 · Flag
A full hour of uninterrupted OxyRush Limpballs? Rated “RT” for R-tarded Teabaggers.

Greta Van Suckup is normally unchallenging when the subject is a Repug. And when the subject is a teabagger icon like OxyRush or the Whore of Babble-On Palin, Van Suckup is invisible. Toss out a fluff question and then sit back and watch OxyRush or the Whore bloviate endlessly.
Jane S commented 2013-08-01 17:37:02 -0400 · Flag
Adding— Greta isn’t trying to keep people guessing, she’s totally up front in her partisanship.

I’ll say it again. Just because she doesn’t bloviate pompously like Hannity or O’Reilly doesn’t make her not a right-winger.
Jane S commented 2013-08-01 17:34:44 -0400 · Flag
If you want to know Van Susteren’s politics, I don’t know why you have to do any more than look at the content of her show night after night.

As I said below, it’s absolutely relentless GOP-TV start to finish. On the rare occasion she has a guest who doesn’t toe the GOP party line, like that FBI guy who made a fool of her the other night about the Benghazi investigation, she freaks out.

“The Clinton thing” referred to is her hosting of a very good legal analysis show on CNN before she went to Fox that was mostly preoccupied with the Paula Jones suit against Clinton and all that followed. She wasn’t particularly pro-Clinton, but she is a defense lawyer who knows her stuff on what’s kosher and what isn’t in the legal system, so she regularly called people on their BS. The GOPers didn’t like that, so decided she had to be pro-Clinton.
Carole S. commented 2013-08-01 17:28:57 -0400 · Flag
Sorry, that is “came on board.”
Carole S. commented 2013-08-01 17:26:47 -0400 · Flag
Here’s an exchange between O’Reilly and Van Susteren when she first come on board at FOX,

“O’Reilly asked Van Susteren if she was a liberal or a conservative, “because with the Clinton thing, people felt that you were liberal because you defended him.” “It depends on the issue,” she responded. “And I’m not dodging you … but you know, I call it like I see it.”

Greta likes to keep us guessing, or doesn’t feel it’s important that she reveals her political affiliation. It doesn’t matter to me really. What does is their insistence that the show is “fair & balanced.”
doors17 commented 2013-08-01 17:08:02 -0400 · Flag
To anyone who believes that GVS is a liberal, I would ask, do you really think she voted against Sarah Palin in 2008?
doors17 commented 2013-08-01 17:02:13 -0400 · Flag
Aria, before Rush went national he was on a Sacramento radio station and I called him twice during the time of the Iran-Contra scandal.

One of several tricks they use is the call screener wants to know what you want to say to give the host time to prepare (which I understand and think is fair) but then they put you on hold for over an hour and while you wait and wait it can make you feel nervous and/or inpatient while the host has the advantage of being in his daily comfort zone. Each time I felt I managed to have a civil conversation without being insulting to him and when I was making my points while disagreeing with his he or his producer would use the old radio trick of cutting off the caller while Rush goes on for about two minutes to create the illusion to the audience that he has the final word leaving the caller speechless, when you can’t respond because they hung up on you.
Jane S commented 2013-08-01 17:00:20 -0400 · Flag
With respect, that’s not the same as “Fox likes to tout here as their liberal commentator.”

In any case, the only way in which she “balances” Hannity et al is in temperament, although she’s been going on agitated rants more and more often in the last year.

And I don’t know who got the idea she’s “close to” the Democratic Party. She isn’t and never has been. As a genuine feminist, she’s a fan of Hillary Clinton’s, but then she’s also a big fan of Sarah Palin, to whom her husband has been an adviser of some sort for years, for the same reason.

Please don’t enable the Foxist propaganda and lazy media meme that Van Susteren is somehow either “liberal” or even “fair and balanced.” She’s not and never has been.
Ellen commented 2013-08-01 16:55:30 -0400 · Flag
Rupert Murdoch named her as the only one he could think of when asked for a balance to the conservative O’Reilly, Hannity, etc. If you follow my link in the post, you’ll see the quote. He said Greta is “close to” the Democratic party.
Jane S commented 2013-08-01 16:44:02 -0400 · Flag
Who says Greta Van Susteren is a liberal?? I’ve never heard or seen that. Fox, and some dimwit “media critics” mistake her relatively mild-mannered style for “objectivity,” but she’s, or her show, are just as hard right as anything else on Fox— maybe moreso because even Hannity has regular Dem. and liberal guests and Van Susteren almost never does. Her show is just pure GOP-TV all the time.

So who’s said she’s “liberal” other than you?
Carole S. commented 2013-08-01 16:21:32 -0400 · Flag
Oh yes! However, she went into her lawyer attack mode when interviewing former FBI Special Agent Jonathan Gilliam, who I thought handled the questions quite well. I could just hear OTR’s producer yelling into her ear, “Cut him off. He’s too convincing.” I think the interview lasted a whole 5 minutes, and even a conservative blog writer over at Mediate mentioned how Greta cut him off. He said it was due to time limits. How does he know?
In a way, It’s kinda sad that FOX’s liberal prime time host (or so they claim) never gets to put any liberals on her show. Think about it. If she is truly a liberal (I disagree), and feels it’s important to have a fair & balanced debate on the issues, then it makes one wonder just how happy she is about being at FOX. Personally, it would drive me crazy having to listen only to conservative viewpoints for 10 years straight with the occasional non-conservative guest. How boring! They would have to pay me a heck of a lot more than they are paying her.
Aria Prescott commented 2013-08-01 16:20:40 -0400 · Flag
Rush couldn’t be in a real interview to save his life, Doors. He stages most of his callers to avoid tough questions- Remember when that Marine went to town on him, and “El Rushbo” was blubbering just off that?

Imagine him against a trained journalist that knows how to give a tough interview.
doors17 commented 2013-08-01 16:14:21 -0400 · Flag
Not surprising considering that July is one of the four ratings sweeps month. (The others being February, May and November) Naturally GVS needs a rating boost and having King Rootin-Tootin of the right as a guest is what she needs to help her numbers.

She’ll never challenge Rush for obvious reasons. Just once I would like see Rush in a real interview and not the typical Fox News ass kissing while he purposely continues to avoid the danger of talking with a real journalist that would have the possibility of any real confrontation that would expose that the empire has no clothes and ruin the fantasy to those who believe he’s invincible.
NewsHounds posted about Rush Limbaugh Takes Over On The Record on NewsHounds' Facebook page 2013-08-01 15:46:53 -0400
He must be needed to balance all that Greta liberalism!








or sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Follow @NewsHounds on Twitter
Subscribe with RSS


We’ve updated our Privacy Policy
Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Created with NationBuilder