Henry Fordson, I find your comments very offensive. You have been banned from this site.

Congratulations, Fordson- you are officially an anti-semite. But by all means, keep playing… I’d like to see what else you out yourself as before you get banned. But I’m done with this thread- take it to the forums if you want to continue, no one wants to see it here.

How good is the information we get about MacDonald or Henry Ford or Lindberg if it was written by Jews? Why can’t there now be an American Defence League to fight the dominant liberal group controlling our media who happens to be this liberal 2% ethnic group?

That doesn’t answer my question on why you’re obsessed with pointing out everyone who’s Jewish when you name names. Is that part going somewhere, or does being Jewish make those people special?

Or maybe you citing Kevin MacDonald as some kinda hero who’s “just asking questions” does answer it a bit:

http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-files/profiles/kevin-macdonald

“Kevin MacDonald is the neo-Nazi movement’s favorite academic. A psychology professor at California State University, Long Beach, MacDonald, who also is a board member of the white supremacist Charles Martel Society, published a trilogy that supposedly “proves” that Jews are genetically driven to destroy Western societies."

Charles Martel Society/The Occidental Quarterly

Founded in 2001 by Chicago millionaire publishing scion William H. Regnery, the Charles Martel Society puts out The Occidental Quarterly, a journal devoted to the idea that “race informs culture” that is edited by a Who’s Who of the radical right. Its chief editor is Kevin Lamb; its managing editor is Louis R. Andrews and its associate editor is Wayne Lutton, who also works at The Social Contract Press, another hate group. The board of the society includes Andrews, Lamb, American Renaissance Editor Jared Taylor and Sam Dickson, a white supremacist lawyer and luminary of the Council of Conservative Citizens. The Occidental Quarterly publishes an array of extremists including Robert S. Griffin, a University of Vermont professor who has been a member of the neo-Nazi National Alliance, and Marian Kester Coombs, wife of the managing editor of The Washington Times and a well-known racist writer. In 2004, the society went beyond publishing for the first time, holding a black-tie dinner in a fancy Washington, D.C., hotel, where it awarded Kevin MacDonald $10,000 and its Jack London Literary Prize for books describing the alleged “group evolutionary strategies” of the Jews. The Charles Martel Society and its journal have been very well received among so-called “academic racists” in America — so much so that when Florida race scientist Glayde Whitney died in 2002, his family asked that in lieu of flowers, mourners send donations to the society.

http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2006/summer/irreconcilable-differences/the-groups

I’ve had your number from the second you started telling us to listen to that Nazi-humping piece of shit, Fordson. Just admit what you are and I’ll leave you alone. I’ll even let you think you won, just because I’m that nice.

Or you can keep going until you’re banned. Either option’s valid.

Where this is going is toward an informed electorate who have only gotten one side (guess who’s) for decades. Somehow Rush and Fox got past their barricade and receive the bulk of their attacks. Imagine how bad it would be if they weren’t Neocons for Israel. Anyone with a logical brain would be asking these questions. Dr. MacDonald at CSULB is a brave tenured professor who is under fire for doing just that. Why is an honest discussion of true but hidden history not allowed?

I can’t help but note that, on top of his tunnel vision with what points to address, Fordson has a strong emphasis on “Jewish” as a talking point. Every time someone’s Jewish, he has to point it out… even when it’s not relative to his post or his overall point.

Perhaps he’d like to tell me where this is going before I dismiss him as an anti-semite.

“I’m scratching my head trying to find any ethnic group that is ultra-liberal”

Okay, ya give up? It’s the Jews. Sorry the clues didn’t help. Many Americans are still as clueless as you even though they’ve almost totally destroyed us with their agenda over the last few decades to control our discussions about their ‘PC’ policies. Welfare, unions, open immigration, Israeli defense- all good for them (Dem votes keep them in charge) but bad, real bad for America.

“I had no idea thay had any kind of agenda or bias. Am I totally out of touch?”

Yes, and that’s just where they want you. Stand outside GMA and Today with your clueless sheep brethren and fill your head with more of the Jewish writer and producers ‘agenda’. Matt and Katie are half and Diane married a big one, John King married the daughter of GMA’s head producer and converted before he went after Newt for them.

“What tf do these media magnates do that is “ultra liberal”?”

Hire more ultralibs to write and report and produce segments for 60 Minutes, morning shows, evening news, sitcoms, movies. It helps if they’re WASPy like Brian or Diane or Leslie Stalh (jewish) so we relate. Barbara Walters might have been too ethnic for the news so they had her do a totally neutral talk show.

Janet: Assuming it ranks the articles by popularity and Relevance. Fox News may be #1 for the channel, but Alexa says they’re getting mudstomped for the site. If you go Purely American, they’re #3 and slipping. This is not counting ABC, CBS and NBC. If you go international, it’s more like #13 and slipping.

This means that, unless Fox News is the only one talking about it or their article’s so offensive everyone’s reading it on the grounds of “I’ll believe it when I see it!”… they’re #3 in the results on a good day.

Numbers don’t like, and they’re losing that war.

Rick Santorum has a nest of ugly, ornery wasps buzzing around inside his skull. The Perfect Norm for Fux Nuze.

@Hemmi Fartson

Yup! Satan’s Time Machine thingie has the fix on against ConTards. Hold yer Bible behind your back, backwards, upside-down in front of a convex mirror using infra-red on the new moon with bare feet under a main-trunk power feed.

I always thought that Google’s links were based on the number of people who had searched a particular item. I had no idea thay had any kind of agenda or bias. Am I totally out of touch?

@YakkiPsD: Now, let’s not assume that. I’m sure Hank’s put together a couple model cars in his mom’s basement.

@Henry Ford’s son: Say, Hank — here’s a thought for ya:

You keep yapping about how the mainstream media is “controlled by the librul Jews” and not representative of “the Majority”.

Didja ever stop to consider . . . since institutions like the media are a reflection of the larger society, maybe, just MAYBE the “majority” of the larger society might actually consist of — gasp! — liberals instead of a teabagging rightwingnut anti-Semite like yourself??

.

p.s. What tf do these media magnates do that is “ultra liberal”? Hang out on their yachts or a Greenpeace boat? Your use of “ethnicity” here doesn’t meet the definition nor criteria in this case. We’re not talking about Jews who went through the Holocaust as an oppressed ethnic group or something. But I bet I can guess where you’re coming from on that, too. Nizkor.

Henry Fordson, “..an ultra-liberal ethnic group of about 2% of the USA controls the MSM, Google, etc.” Huh? Which “group”? Stockholders? Are rich businessmen an “ethnic group”? I’m scratching my head trying to find any ethnic group that is ultra-liberal. African Americans tend to vote heavily Democratic, but otherwise don’t do much that is liberal. Ethnic groups in this country overall average out to be fairly mainstream. And they aren’t a 2% ethnic group.
The notion that media content is controlled by “liberals” just isn’t reality. But I actually like the fact that Henry whoever does more than just pop one sentence down and disappear. I’m hoping to get into some of that fact/fallacy debate stuff with someone from the other side. Why are there so many chickens over at Fox Nayshun? They just don’t come over here and discuss things?

It’s a matter of time before Pretty Ricky drops out of the race. The cashflow will be drying up for the lad. And he can’t blame Google for his failed presidential campaign.

Sorry Fordson- had to go have a life for a couple hours. You might wanna try that sometime.

Funny how you can’t distinguish between the CEO of a network and the CEO of a parent company. For instance, you said that Bob Iger runs ABC when he actually runs Disney- the parent corporation. ABC’s CEO is Anne Sweeny.

Network CEO- runs the network.
Parent company CEO- Doesn’t run the network.

See the difference?

And before you feed me that she’s only a CEO because Iger approves, you have no clue how it works. The majority of the board has to approve and look at the Disney names that support her- past and present. The board on both sides of the political fence approve of her because of her ability to keep the network’s views neutral. News and scripted programming.

BTW, the name calling was real classy… and I liked your little confession that you wouldn’t approve of Fox if it wasn’t owned by a Conservative. Shows that you’re nothing but someone to toy with until I get bored.

hey where’d everybody go? MediaMatters for some comebacks?

don’t see too much in the way of honest debate here just some lines that Maddow or Stewart might like from their psychophants.

NBC just spent 14 out of 23 non commercial minutes on the clown car that is the republican party primary in South Carolina.
0 minutes on the President.

Love the link down there that shows the libs are interviewing repubs so there’s no bias. Let’s see if they’re thrown the same softballs Obama gets.

Comcast now runs NBC and it’s liberal Jewish CEO was who Obama visited in Martha’s Vineyard, Sumner Rothstein owns Viacom (CBS, Mtv, Comedy Central). ABC Is run by Iger (yep). Only Fox is almost okay (Murdoch’s a Neocon) Where’s the Majority represented? Just in some comment forums. And Aria, besides the Santorum search result, Google news leads me right to the most liberal sources. And Wikipedia’s very lib as well. Come on, everybody sees how the Majority is not represented and usually mocked. This site is a good example.

Next to each other, bleh… God, my typos are getting bad!

Exactly, MJ… I’m trying to find one example of a story Google tried to block to protect Obama or pronounce to humiliate a Republican. I have had no problem finding left, right or center views from each other.

Far cry from the “shadow government” scenario Fordson is trying to lay down. And I’m still trying to figure out how liberals own the media- Let’s look at how much of it Murdoch owns. Even before we include him, Clear, Premiere and WTOR are all Republican owned. Not to mention how many news sites have Republican editors.

And let’s include that ABC and CBS are both centric with their coverage, and lean right more often than left. NBC leans left more than right, but they’re hardly the epitome of bias Fox News claims. Even MSNBC isn’t as bad as advertised.

Maybe when Fordson’s done with the math, he can recite what Beck told him to say about everything else. I’m all for wasting a little time trying to introduce him to a few facts.

“Your whole response avoided my central point. Which was: an ultra-liberal ethnic group of about 2% of the USA controls the MSM, Google, etc.” — Henry Ford’s son

Wow — I’d have never guessed:

http://thepoliticalcarnival.net/2012/01/21/media-bias-sunday-and-by-media-bias-i-mean-republican/

Henry Fordson = “Scott Simon”

.

‘there is no illuminati/NWO/shadow government’
Who said there was? Your whole response avoided my central point. Which was: an ultra-liberal ethnic group of about 2% of the USA controls the MSM, Google, etc. Nothing to do with Beck, he criticizes Soros but Loves him some Israel as do Murdoch and Rush. Ron Paul on the other hand won’t bow down to AIPAC so he gets some not so nice coverage. As for Google, you know very well and repeat it here, the vile treatment the give Santorum. But if you google ‘jew’ all of a sudden their algorithm gets ‘censor-y’.

Ok, you could have just said you listen to too much Glenn Beck, but preaching his “One World Order” BS is another way to admit to that…

But seriously- and listen to me here… there is no illuminati/NWO/shadow government. Both sides are equal share, and in many cases equal blame.

The Republicans get more scrutiny because they whine like mules about accountability, then go out of their way to avoid it themselves when their names are on the wrong side of that. If they didn’t make such a big show of that, they’d be getting the same “We’ll remember this come election time!” warning the Democrats get.

The Dems are far from perfect- But I have never seen them have a problem with questioning the office holders from their side when they do something wrong, and I have yet to see an article about it vanish from Google unless it was the site’s choice to delete it. I only see it vanish from Youtube when copyright’s complained about- and I noticed that when it’s up, all the people who have a problem with it are right-wingers.

Wonder who was putting in the comlpaints?

One side makes excuses, the other makes amends. Guess which one, let’s see if you can get it right.

“Henry, dare I ask you to explain that further?”

Certainly, there’s this group that isn’t the Finns, who currently control the media, Google, the Fed, the Unions and so the schools, the ACLU, AIPAC and so the politicans, and way too many other things that we can’t talk about or face the wrath of the ADL like Professor MacDonald at CSULB. And soon, I bet, we can’t discuss it here.

Henry, dare I ask you to explain that further?

I think what he meant was that there is an overrepresentation of one tiny (2%), liberal ethnic culture in the media and at Google. I agree and thank the candidates for pointing that out to their base, the Majority.

Facpalm I thought I could come up with something to say about this… but Santorum has done such a good job proving he’s his namesake here that I can’t add anything.