Rick Santorum visited the Hannity show last night where he eagerly joined in the only unfairness of significance in this country according to Sean Hannity and much of Fox News – liberal media bias. But Santorum suddenly took the discussion beyond bashing the usual culprits when he began lashing out at the liberal bias of Google. According to Santorum, Google is “trying to destroy fundamental values in this country and conservatives who fight for (them).” While Santorum was on his anti-Google tear, Hannity could be heard agreeing off camera.
Hannity – obviously a Newt Gingrich supporter - cut off Santorum early in the interview in order to focus the discussion away from his stumping in order to attack the media. I’m sure it was just a coincidence that that has matched Gingrich’s debate tactic. Hannity was at his most hypocritically Hanctimonious as he whined about both the media focusing on old news and that it hadn’t focused enough on old news about Obama. “I want you to respond to dealing with the media in this race and do you think it’s unfair?” Hannity asked.
Of course, Santorum thinks the media is “fundamentally unfair.” He said he’s been “sabotaged in every possible way.” Then, Santorum said,
“Go on the internet. Look at the filth that is spewed out there. Look at organizations like Google! I mean Google! Who has repeatedly, on more than one occasion, taken down sites, taken down searches for folks like Barack Obama and Michelle Obama but has let it out there for me for 10 years! So people can be exposed to the most horrific filth that you ever want to see. But it’s OK If you’re a conservative. You can do that. Google wants to do that because they have a political agenda, which they do. It’s not just the mainstream media. It is anyone that has access to the eyes and ears of the American public and they are consistently trying to destroy fundamental values in this country and conservatives who fight for (them).”
Hannity could be heard off camera agreeing with Santorum as he spoke.
Or maybe you citing Kevin MacDonald as some kinda hero who’s “just asking questions” does answer it a bit:
http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-files/profiles/kevin-macdonald
“Kevin MacDonald is the neo-Nazi movement’s favorite academic. A psychology professor at California State University, Long Beach, MacDonald, who also is a board member of the white supremacist Charles Martel Society, published a trilogy that supposedly “proves” that Jews are genetically driven to destroy Western societies."
Charles Martel Society/The Occidental Quarterly
Founded in 2001 by Chicago millionaire publishing scion William H. Regnery, the Charles Martel Society puts out The Occidental Quarterly, a journal devoted to the idea that “race informs culture” that is edited by a Who’s Who of the radical right. Its chief editor is Kevin Lamb; its managing editor is Louis R. Andrews and its associate editor is Wayne Lutton, who also works at The Social Contract Press, another hate group. The board of the society includes Andrews, Lamb, American Renaissance Editor Jared Taylor and Sam Dickson, a white supremacist lawyer and luminary of the Council of Conservative Citizens. The Occidental Quarterly publishes an array of extremists including Robert S. Griffin, a University of Vermont professor who has been a member of the neo-Nazi National Alliance, and Marian Kester Coombs, wife of the managing editor of The Washington Times and a well-known racist writer. In 2004, the society went beyond publishing for the first time, holding a black-tie dinner in a fancy Washington, D.C., hotel, where it awarded Kevin MacDonald $10,000 and its Jack London Literary Prize for books describing the alleged “group evolutionary strategies” of the Jews. The Charles Martel Society and its journal have been very well received among so-called “academic racists” in America — so much so that when Florida race scientist Glayde Whitney died in 2002, his family asked that in lieu of flowers, mourners send donations to the society.
http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2006/summer/irreconcilable-differences/the-groups
I’ve had your number from the second you started telling us to listen to that Nazi-humping piece of shit, Fordson. Just admit what you are and I’ll leave you alone. I’ll even let you think you won, just because I’m that nice.
Or you can keep going until you’re banned. Either option’s valid.
Perhaps he’d like to tell me where this is going before I dismiss him as an anti-semite.
Okay, ya give up? It’s the Jews. Sorry the clues didn’t help. Many Americans are still as clueless as you even though they’ve almost totally destroyed us with their agenda over the last few decades to control our discussions about their ‘PC’ policies. Welfare, unions, open immigration, Israeli defense- all good for them (Dem votes keep them in charge) but bad, real bad for America.
“I had no idea thay had any kind of agenda or bias. Am I totally out of touch?”
Yes, and that’s just where they want you. Stand outside GMA and Today with your clueless sheep brethren and fill your head with more of the Jewish writer and producers ‘agenda’. Matt and Katie are half and Diane married a big one, John King married the daughter of GMA’s head producer and converted before he went after Newt for them.
“What tf do these media magnates do that is âultra liberalâ?”
Hire more ultralibs to write and report and produce segments for 60 Minutes, morning shows, evening news, sitcoms, movies. It helps if they’re WASPy like Brian or Diane or Leslie Stalh (jewish) so we relate. Barbara Walters might have been too ethnic for the news so they had her do a totally neutral talk show.
This means that, unless Fox News is the only one talking about it or their article’s so offensive everyone’s reading it on the grounds of “I’ll believe it when I see it!”… they’re #3 in the results on a good day.
Numbers don’t like, and they’re losing that war.
Yup! Satan’s Time Machine thingie has the fix on against ConTards. Hold yer Bible behind your back, backwards, upside-down in front of a convex mirror using infra-red on the new moon with bare feet under a main-trunk power feed.
@Henry Ford’s son: Say, Hank — here’s a thought for ya:
You keep yapping about how the mainstream media is “controlled by the librul Jews” and not representative of “the Majority”.
Didja ever stop to consider . . . since institutions like the media are a reflection of the larger society, maybe, just MAYBE the “majority” of the larger society might actually consist of — gasp! — liberals instead of a teabagging rightwingnut anti-Semite like yourself??
.
The notion that media content is controlled by “liberals” just isn’t reality. But I actually like the fact that Henry whoever does more than just pop one sentence down and disappear. I’m hoping to get into some of that fact/fallacy debate stuff with someone from the other side. Why are there so many chickens over at Fox Nayshun? They just don’t come over here and discuss things?
Funny how you can’t distinguish between the CEO of a network and the CEO of a parent company. For instance, you said that Bob Iger runs ABC when he actually runs Disney- the parent corporation. ABC’s CEO is Anne Sweeny.
Network CEO- runs the network.
Parent company CEO- Doesn’t run the network.
See the difference?
And before you feed me that she’s only a CEO because Iger approves, you have no clue how it works. The majority of the board has to approve and look at the Disney names that support her- past and present. The board on both sides of the political fence approve of her because of her ability to keep the network’s views neutral. News and scripted programming.
BTW, the name calling was real classy… and I liked your little confession that you wouldn’t approve of Fox if it wasn’t owned by a Conservative. Shows that you’re nothing but someone to toy with until I get bored.
0 minutes on the President.
Far cry from the “shadow government” scenario Fordson is trying to lay down. And I’m still trying to figure out how liberals own the media- Let’s look at how much of it Murdoch owns. Even before we include him, Clear, Premiere and WTOR are all Republican owned. Not to mention how many news sites have Republican editors.
And let’s include that ABC and CBS are both centric with their coverage, and lean right more often than left. NBC leans left more than right, but they’re hardly the epitome of bias Fox News claims. Even MSNBC isn’t as bad as advertised.
Maybe when Fordson’s done with the math, he can recite what Beck told him to say about everything else. I’m all for wasting a little time trying to introduce him to a few facts.
Wow — I’d have never guessed:
http://thepoliticalcarnival.net/2012/01/21/media-bias-sunday-and-by-media-bias-i-mean-republican/
Henry Fordson = “Scott Simon”
.
Who said there was? Your whole response avoided my central point. Which was: an ultra-liberal ethnic group of about 2% of the USA controls the MSM, Google, etc. Nothing to do with Beck, he criticizes Soros but Loves him some Israel as do Murdoch and Rush. Ron Paul on the other hand won’t bow down to AIPAC so he gets some not so nice coverage. As for Google, you know very well and repeat it here, the vile treatment the give Santorum. But if you google ‘jew’ all of a sudden their algorithm gets ‘censor-y’.
But seriously- and listen to me here… there is no illuminati/NWO/shadow government. Both sides are equal share, and in many cases equal blame.
The Republicans get more scrutiny because they whine like mules about accountability, then go out of their way to avoid it themselves when their names are on the wrong side of that. If they didn’t make such a big show of that, they’d be getting the same “We’ll remember this come election time!” warning the Democrats get.
The Dems are far from perfect- But I have never seen them have a problem with questioning the office holders from their side when they do something wrong, and I have yet to see an article about it vanish from Google unless it was the site’s choice to delete it. I only see it vanish from Youtube when copyright’s complained about- and I noticed that when it’s up, all the people who have a problem with it are right-wingers.
Wonder who was putting in the comlpaints?
One side makes excuses, the other makes amends. Guess which one, let’s see if you can get it right.
Certainly, there’s this group that isn’t the Finns, who currently control the media, Google, the Fed, the Unions and so the schools, the ACLU, AIPAC and so the politicans, and way too many other things that we can’t talk about or face the wrath of the ADL like Professor MacDonald at CSULB. And soon, I bet, we can’t discuss it here.