Hiya Eyes On. I’m sure a clever cryptologist could take the various hosts’ restatings of The Ailes Memo of the Day and triangulate back to exactly what was on the original piece of paper, but I always took the shortcut of just listening to Doocy – the lazy dunce would jam the big prick’s message almost word for word into whatever slander he happened to be spouting.

Doocy. Dead man talking?

The way to shut up serial liar Reince Priebus is to ask him to release all the RNC emails for full transparency. Because we certainly know nobody in the RNC establishment is alarmed over the Trump presidency and certainly there would be nobody in headquarter swetting their bed over Hair HIlter’s run. But wait! The Republican establishment has already voted and most skipped #RNCinCLE. Oh, never mind. ;^)

While we’re at it, lets release the FOX News internal emails exchanged between the Foxies and Der Furor. All the milkshake bribes O’Reilly sent The Donald. All the strategy sessions between Roger ‘The Pervert Dodger’ Ailes. Transcripts of all the sweet whispers Hannity emailed while he had his head shoved up Trump’s golden ass. Oh my, what a treasure trove all that’d be!

Methinks the R-Souls should tread carefully. I would imagine that the emails between their head honchos and between them and Fox would have been hotter than hell…

This whole crap about the DNC doing anything to benefit Clinton is nonsense. It IS amazing, however, that I don’t see many of the people who are so riled by the (false) accusation having much of a long-term memory. All one needs do is go back and look at 2008 when the DNC most certainly played favorites when it came to Obama vs Clinton. EVERYTHING the DNC did was to Obama’s benefit.

You had the likes of Obama supporter Ted Kennedy pulling the “superdelegates should support the candidate who wins their state” card—until Massachusetts decisively went for Clinton; then, suddenly, “superdelegates should be free to support whomever they feel is the better candidate.”

There was the nonsense with the Florida and Michigan delegations being stripped of their delegates because their state legislatures chose to move the primaries before the “permitted” date; interestingly, Clinton won the majority of each state. Then, when the Rules Committee finally decided to “let” the state’s delegates attend the convention, they were punished by only having each delegate’s vote count as “half.” AND, then the DNC rewarded Obama by giving him nearly half of Michigan’s delegates, despite his name not even being on the state’s primary ballot (he’d voluntarily removed his name from the ballot).

And, then, there were NO hearings into the allegations of intimidation of caucus-goers in Texas, a state which held a primary and a caucus (the primary provided about 2/3 and the caucus provided about 1/3 of the state’s total pledged delegates). Hillary won the primary by 100,000 votes, earning 65 delegates to Obama’s 61. But, the precinct caucuses (the first round in the caucus delegate selection process) were a travesty. Even now—8 years after the fact—there is NO accurate accounting of how many people participated in the first round; the Wiki article on the 2008 Texas primary and caucus can only provide results for 41.1% of the precincts. The Clinton campaign asked for results to be verified before the second stage of the caucuses were held, only to be turned down and the DNC refused to intervene. Plus, there were a number of reports of people being turned away from the caucus sites they were told to go to and some reports of caucus-goers (mostly white and older) being threatened by Obama supporters and some claims that people were too late and wouldn’t be let in (while others who’d arrived even later were admitted with no problem). Some people claimed they were asked for proof they’d voted in the primary (which was a requirement) on that day (which was not; people who’d voted absentee were authorized to participate in the caucus). But, despite State Party officials saying they’d investigate, nothing came of it and the DNC refused to step in as well. (Just imagine the results if this had happened this year and Sanders and his supporters had been on the receiving end of this treatment!)

But Priebus isn’t really one to talk. As I recall, HE was doing his best back in February and March to keep tRump from becoming the Party’s nominee.

The leaked emails are pretty milquetoast. Typical democrats. The real story is these hackers most likely operated from the Kremlin. At the state level. Not some rogue Rusky, but someone working out of a government building in Russia. The reason Russians are suspected is the timing. The periods the hackers were being monitored as active would coincide with Russian time zones for 9 to 5. And days they were inactive coincided with Russian holidays. So somebody in Russia, working a 9 to 5 job is hacking into the DNC emails.

I know that part is circumstantial, but there is a Russian/Trump financial connection also. American banks are too wise for Trump to get a loan, but the Russians are willing to loan him money. And it doesn’t stop there. Trump made changes in the republican platform that would compromise NATO to help Russia.

So where’s all the right wingers who back in the day were foaming at the mouth about fluoridated water and commies behind every corner???

For better or for worse, Hillary Clinton won the Democratic nomination by winning a lot more votes than Bernie Sanders. The votes were not rigged, and neither were the voters. Clinton simply got more people to vote for her. For Priebus to make the smarmy accusation that she’s somehow “illegitimate” is so offensive that it doesn’t even merit the laugh test.

One can argue that some of the comments in the leaked emails aren’t friendly to Sanders. Some of the comments are themselves offensive. But there’s nothing to indicate that the DNC sanctioned nastiness or impropriety. If anything, various emails show DNC staffers scolding people who were making inappropriate comments.

Having read a series of what were considered the “Most Damaging” emails, what see is not a concerted effort to “rig the system” against Sanders but rather a frustration with his supporters’ repeated attempts to disrupt primary events and caucuses. Schultz’s angriest statements came after the awful behavior by Sanders supporters in Nevada when they threw things and made threats after a parliamentary gambit of theirs failed. Granted, the DNC must remain neutral (and in many emails, the staffers say exactly that), but there’s nothing inherently wrong in politicians knowing the way the polling reads for the remaining states after April.

At this point, Fox News and the right wing are doing everything they can to blow this stuff way out of proportion, since they’re hoping they can make it sound stranger than the dark circus they inflicted last week in Cleveland.