NewsHounds
We watch Fox so you don't have to!
  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Forum
  • Blogroll
  • Donate
  • Shop
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
Home →

O’Reilly ‘Just Asks’ If Colin Powell Endorsed Obama Because They’re Affirmative Action Soul Brothers

Posted by Ellen -7859.80pc on November 01, 2012 · Flag

One day after Bill O’Reilly revealed he thinks President Barack Obama has a “grievance against whites,” he “just asked” if the reason General Colin Powell endorsed Obama is because they both benefited from affirmative action. Guest and Fox News contributor Arthel Neville smacked down O’Reilly but good.

O’Reilly: General Powell has been, in his books, quite candid about him using affirmative action to succeed, alright, and Barack Obama did use affirmative action to, you know, be educated and something like that. Do you think that there is any racial business here?

Neville: No.

O’Reilly: And I’m not saying that pejoratively. I’m not saying that in a negative… But a connection – the general and the president came up the same way.

Right, he doesn’t mean it in a negative way, he’s just wondering if the guy who has a racial grievance was endorsed by another black guy merely because they’re both black and both benefitted from affirmative action. Incidentally, O’Reilly believes affirmative action gives minorities an unfair advantage over whites.

Neville was great at smacking down O’Reilly. She said,

Neville: Does that mean that if Mike Huckabee supports you, is it racism? Absolutely not… I understand what you’re trying to say there, Bill, but I think it’s disrespectful. I think it’s disrespectful to General Powell, it’s disrespectful to the president… You can’t take such a pedigree and try to dilute it to pigmentation.

O’Reilly: You don’t think shared experience enters into General Powell’s endorsement?

Neville: You’re telling me that if President Obama had not done a good job, that Colin Powell, General Powell would have supported President Obama regardless? Absolutely not.

O’Reilly: No, I’m saying that he might be cutting him a little more slack… It’s just a provocative question which is what I do here.

He looked chastened.

Follow @NewsHounds

Follow @NewsHoundEllen


Do you like this post?
Tweet

Showing 14 reactions



    Review the site rules
Bemused commented 2012-11-03 05:33:26 -0400 · Flag
I agree with Ellen in feeling that Neville has been a disappointment. I’ve always given her a pass because she’s too young to have the sort of credentials that allow other token minority journalists like Rivera and Williams to buck the system.
Ellen commented 2012-11-03 00:35:58 -0400 · Flag
d d, Yes we still have Top Dogs, though I haven’t figured out where and how to put the little doggie back on the site. But Neville has been disappointing in the past so I guess I’m a bit prejudiced (no pun intended).
Marc Paige commented 2012-11-02 11:10:10 -0400 · Flag
Wonder what Fox’s Juan Williams has to say about O’Reilly being “provocative”….or in real speak, shamelessly racist for political purposes.
Marc Paige commented 2012-11-02 11:07:20 -0400 · Flag
This story is so shocking, that we need MSNBC, CNN, Media Matters, CBS, NAACP, Jon Stewart, etc. to expose Bill O’Reilly for the shameless racist and Republican shill that he is, but constantly denies.
Marc Paige commented 2012-11-02 11:04:31 -0400 · Flag
Bill O’Reilly has joined John Sununu in insinuating that Colin Powell is just as racist as they are. Both O’Reilly and Sununu will say and do anything to get Mitt Romney elected.
truman commented 2012-11-02 10:40:08 -0400 · Flag
No Bildo. It’s not a “provocative question.” It’s race-baiting.
Sandman2 commented 2012-11-02 09:38:51 -0400 · Flag
Archie Bunker just released a statement saying that he distanced himself from O’Reilly’s bigoted language.
Why does Billdo turn into a stereotype spewing machine whenever there is a black person sitting in front of him? Marc Lamont Hill gets the same stupid bigoted “just asking” racially divisive questions.
Stay classy Bill.
d d commented 2012-11-02 09:24:33 -0400 · Flag
Come on, BOR, playing the race card AGAIN? Seriously?! Are you really feeling so desperate about Romney losing that you are willing to accuse Gen. Powell of letting his skin color dictate his endorsements? You try to present yourself as just asking the “provocative” questions when what you really are is a right-wing tool/fool revealing his inner racist in the guise of a supposedly “fair & balanced” analyst.

Arthel Neville – THANK YOU for smacking his disrespectful argument down with clear headed logic. I so wish that FOX “news” had more commentators like you.

I don’t know if NHs still has its “Top Dog” designation but, if it does, Arthel Neville deserves it.
Bemused commented 2012-11-02 04:19:32 -0400 · Flag
On-topic. Bill conveniently forgets that Colin Powell was “had” by a band of colleagues who so dearly wanted a war that they invented much of the evidence used to support that war. The foxies who have been ranting on and on about a cover-up for the Benghazi disaster should pause and reflect on what was done then and on how hard the Bush administration tried to hide those acts of treason.

Among other stunts, they sent a top diplomat to Niger (Africa) to investigate reports that yellow cake was being produced for export to Iran. He came back and refused to confirm the reports (the documents had been forged and there were no signs of any such production on the ground). Elements within that administration punished him by outing his wife who was a covert CIA agent thereby endangering years of undercover work with local informants throughout the middle east. Pro-American elements throughout the middle east probably disappeared as a result of that act of treason by elements within the Bush Administration.

Colin Powell, being a soldier through and through, has said little to nothing about his time in office. Colin Powell’s CV tells me skin color has little if anything to do with his endorsement of Obama.

PS: I trust that your pink slip will be in the mail by start of business on Friday November 9th, 2012,
Bemused commented 2012-11-02 04:04:13 -0400 · Flag
Marc Paige wrote, quoting Bill: “I don’t think Jesus Christ would go to planned parenthood, …”

Yet more proof that Bill is unable to think beyond a very tiny fenced-in yard in his head: Jesus actually did that sort of thing when he spoke respectfully with Maria Magdalena. The narrow minded were shocked, shocked I tell you.

Bill: I trust that your pink slip is being processed asap.
Marc Paige commented 2012-11-02 01:07:05 -0400 · Flag
Earlier in the show tonight, Bill tried to drive a wedge between blacks and gays over marriage equality, to try to shave off enough African-American votes to elect Mitt. Then later, Bill spoke for Jesus, saying I don’t think Jesus Christ would go to planned parenthood, except to try to convert them. He ended with, as Bill put it, the “racial connection” of Powell’s endorsement.
Marc Paige commented 2012-11-02 00:59:10 -0400 · Flag
Bill tried a twofer tonight. Stir up white anger over race, AND affirmative action, in one segment. Oh Bill, you’re so clever!
Viva Valdez commented 2012-11-02 00:55:56 -0400 · Flag
Bill O’Reilly once again demonstrating that while I don’t believe he’s a racist he certainly still has some racism in him by assuming President Obama received affirmative action help despite no evidence. So if a black kid earns a scholarship to a prestigious university it’s affirmative action but a white kid earned it?
Joseph West commented 2012-11-02 00:44:06 -0400 · Flag
Let me see if I can follow O’Reilly’s line of thinking. (Let me know if I’m wrong.)

First off, affirmative action is wrong when it helps African-Americans. (Except when those African-Americans are die-hard dyed-in-the-wool conservative loons like Allen West, Herman Cain and Clarence Thomas. Bear in mind the only reason the last man got his current job was because he was replacing the great Thurgood Marshall.)

Then, if whites vote for an African-American Democrat, they’re just “liberals” voting out of “white guilt.” But if/when whites vote for an African-American Republicon, it’s “proof” that they’re not racists.

And finally, if an African-American Democrat says something that O’Reilly vehemently disagrees with, he’s to be pilloried on every occasion. But, if an African-American Republicon says something that O’Reilly vehemently disagrees with, he’s either pitied or he’s treated politely and it’s a case of “let’s agree to disagree.”








or sign in with Facebook or email.
Follow @NewsHounds on Twitter
Subscribe with RSS


We’ve updated our Privacy Policy
Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Created with NationBuilder