NewsHounds
We watch Fox so you don't have to!
  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Forum
  • Blogroll
  • Donate
  • Shop
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
Home →

Mitch McConnell Promises Hannity A Sham Impeachment Trial

Posted by Ellen -7841.60pc on December 13, 2019 · Flag

If for some reason you thought Donald Trump’s impeachment might propel Sen. #MoscowMitch McConnell to put country over power and partisanship, his disturbing chat with Sean Hannity last night should completely disabuse you of such a possibility.

McConnell does not often visit Fox News nor is he a verbal bomb thrower like Hannity. But McConnell could not have signaled his sycophantic solidarity better if he had shown up wearing a red MAGA cap.

As B-roll footage of Trump pointing thumbs up and raising a victorious fist took half the screen, McConnell feigned impartiality: “We’ll listen to the opening arguments by the House prosecutors and we’ll listen to the president’s lawyers respond and then we’ll have to make a decision about the way forward,” he said.

But soon, McConnell actually admitted his decision is about making sure Trump stays in power. “And everything I do during this, I’m coordinating with White House counsel. There will be no difference between the president’s position and our position as to how to handle this to the extent that we can. … We have no choice but to take [impeachment] up, but we’ll be working through this process, hopefully in a fairly short period of time, in total coordination with the White House counsel’s office and the people who are representing the president in the well of the Senate.”

Hannity, who fashions himself a legal expert, lectured McConnell on the evidentiary insufficiencies of the case against Trump. Not surprisingly, Hannity warped the facts to suit his dishonest narrative:

HANNITY: The one fact witness [Gordon Sondland] said, “The president said he wants nothing, no quid pro quo.” That was the only fact witness that I saw.

Greg Sargent notes that is a drastic misrepresentation of what Sondland said. He testified that he understood there to be a quid pro quo and told a top aide to Ukraine’s President Zelensky that aid was conditioned upon announcing a Biden investigation.

Hannity also claimed there was no “evidence of wrongdoing whatsoever” by Trump which is, as Sargent put it, “utter nonsense.”

It’s worth pointing out that McConnell, who surely knows better, did not endorse Hannity’s claim. Instead, what McConnell said may be even worse because he made it clear he doesn’t care about the facts, only in propping up Trump. McConnell reiterated, “Well, exactly how we go forward, I’m going to coordinate with the president’s lawyers so there won’t be any difference between us on how to do this.”

In case anyone missed the point, McConnell added, “We all know how it’s going to end, there’s no chance the president’s going to be removed from office.”

This is not how America is supposed to work. McConnell is supposed to be a member of the jury, not a member of Trump’s defense team.

Of course, make-believe lawyer Hannity had no problem with it. He discoursed on the “obstruction issue,” and propounded that it would be “smart” to avoid calling witnesses.

Again, McConnell pledged his 100% MAGA fealty, telling Trump’s Bedtime BFF and unofficial chief of staff, “Again, I’m gonna take my cues from the president’s lawyers but yes, if you know you have the votes, you’ve listened to the arguments on both sides, and believe the case is so slim, so weak that you have the votes to end it, that might be what the president’s lawyers would prefer and you can certainly make a case for making it shorter rather than longer since it’s such a weak case.”

CNN reported that McConnell’s plan is to quickly acquit Trump by voting down the articles of impeachment, without calling witnesses, rather than to just dismiss the charges, if he has the 51 votes to do that. Everything McConnell said here validates that reporting.

As depressing as all this is, there are some glimmers of hope. Sargent and Paul Waldman laid out plausible paths for Democrats to put Republicans on defense. They also note that it’s quite possible McConnell will not have the votes for his scheme.

But we, the people, must do our part to resist such corruption and demand Trump be held accountable. Call your senators, visit their offices and town halls and attend MoveOn.org’s “Nobody is above the law” events. Also, help out the Ditch Mitch Fund.

See why McConnell's corruption makes grassroots actions so important, below, from the December 12, 2019 Hannity.

Follow @NewsHounds

Follow @NewsHoundEllen


Do you like this post?
Tweet

Showing 8 reactions



    Review the site rules
truman commented 2019-12-14 09:29:42 -0500 · Flag
Moscow Mitch and Leningrad Lindsey’s obsequiousness will only further embolden Mango Mussolini. His unlawful behavior will ratchet up yet another notch as the 2020 election draws closer. Why not? As long as the GOPiggies hold at least 1/3 of the Senate, Mango Mussolini will never be held accountable.
Eyes On Fox commented 2019-12-14 08:12:51 -0500 · Flag
Kevin, one reason I bring up the issue of ethics and law is because all Senators will be administered an oath by Chief Justice Roberts and the Senators will be required to sign an oath book acknowledging this. I think the oath reads (emphasis added):

“Do you solemnly swear that in all things appertaining to the trial of the impeachment of Donald John Trump, Pr^sident of the United States, now pending, you will do impartial justice according to the Constitution and laws, so help you God.”

#MoscowMitch ‘pre-violated’ that oath on Hannity. Though maybe #MoscowMitch and #LenigradLindsey get administered separate oaths by Putin pledging loyalty to the interests of Mother Russia.
Bemused commented 2019-12-14 07:21:44 -0500 · Flag
As a con man would say: “Tails I win, heads you lose”.
Bemused commented 2019-12-14 07:13:12 -0500 · Flag
Put simply, the judges are in the defendant’s pocket. Wasn’t that the definition of a kangaroo court? The version where the defendant can do no wrong. The corollary of which is: “the prosecution is always wrong”.
Kevin Koster commented 2019-12-14 01:22:18 -0500 · Flag
To answer Eyes, it’s not ethical in that this is not how these matters were intended to be handled, but it’s not outright illegal. In the same way that McConnell’s vicious refusal to hold hearings for Merrick Garland wasn’t outright illegal. It’s just another sign that he’s being typically brazen like today’s Republicans, and he’s making sure you know that he will dump this matter as fast as he can.

The only factor that appears to be slowing him down a little is his uncertainty about the exact number of GOP senators upon which he can depend for a blanket vote. If he knew he could count on every vote, his first course of action would be an immediate voice vote to dismiss the charges and end the matter before even hearing the case. That is the approach I’ve been expecting him to take, as it would present the fastest way out, provide the least exposure to any damaging discussions, and it would be the most brutal way to give a big middle finger to the House and to the rest of the country.

Barring that approach, he’ll take the course discussed here with Hannity – allowing each side to quickly present their case and THEN doing the fast voice vote and once again giving that middle finger to the rest of the country.

I’m not seeing any other plan from the GOP, regardless of their Brer Rabbit shouts of wanting a long trial with lots of witnesses. In reality, the Right Wing is terrified of that idea.

My expectation is that this entire matter will either be over within a day or two of getting to the Senate, or within one hour of getting to the Senate. And then the GOP and the Dems will campaign on the situation for the rest of 2020. And the key to the election will not be the impeachment but will instead be what the key to all elections has always been: Turnout.
Eyes On Fox commented 2019-12-13 20:42:42 -0500 · Flag
How is this even legal? Certainly it isn’t ethical.
John McKee commented 2019-12-13 20:42:05 -0500 · Flag
What he wins for Tump by such blatant obeisance, MacConnell loses for himself and what is left of his party in the eyes of independents and ANYONE who believes in fair play. Short term expedience, long term oblivion.
scooter commented 2019-12-13 19:11:19 -0500 · Flag
Mitch is putting his treason right in our faces daring anybody to do something about it. I really hope someone does….








or sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Follow @NewsHounds on Twitter
Subscribe with RSS


We’ve updated our Privacy Policy
Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Created with NationBuilder