NewsHounds
We watch Fox so you don't have to!
  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Forum
  • Blogroll
  • Donate
  • Shop
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
Home →

Megyn Kelly Scolds On Benghazi: ‘Act Of Terror’ Is Not Synonymous With ‘Terrorist Attack!’

Posted by Ellen -7859.80pc on February 06, 2014 · Flag

Not since Megyn Kelly “assured” us that Santa is white, has she looked as foolish and biased as she did tonight arguing with Democrat Adam Schiff over Benghazi. She sounded almost hysterical as she demanded to know why President Obama called the attack on the American compound in Benghazi an “act of terror” and not a “terrorist attack.” Fortunately, Schiff nicely called out and smacked down her ridiculousness.

The pretext for rehashing this non-issue this time was a letter signed by three Republican senators using President Obama’s Super Bowl interview with Bill O'Reilly as an excuse to complain that he had not called Benghazi “a terrorist attack.”

This segment perfectly illustrates the Fox News/GOP Tag Team on Benghazi

See how this symbiosis works? O’Reilly plays GOP gotcha with the president, then the GOP uses the president’s response to hit back, then Fox News uses their attack as yet another “news” item to use against President Obama.

It’s too bad Schiff didn’t nail Fox on that, too. But we won’t quibble with the job he did.

You really need to watch the video to get the full effect but here are some “highlights”: 

SCHIFF: As you remember from the campaign, the president referred to (Benghazi) as a terror attack the day after it took place.

KELLY: No, he did not. He called it “an act of terror.” That is not synonymous!

SCHIFF: An act of terror is not a terror attack? That sounds like the same thing to me.

…

KELLY (more excited) (interrupting): Listen, I’m doing you a favor because my viewers want an answer to this and they’re not satisfied. So I’m giving you, as a Democrat …the opportunity to convince them.

SCHIFF: If you’re doing me a favor, then let me finish.

KELLY: I’m gonna let you finish! But I don’t like dodging away from the question I want to keep you on point.

If you think an act of terror is synonymous in the president’s mind with terrorist attack then why, two weeks later, did the president decline to go that far when Joy Behar asked him (on The View), “Was this a terrorist attack?”

SCHIFF: You know, Megyn, honestly I think it’s a little bit ridiculous to say that someone who refers to an “act of terror” is not talking about a terrorist attack.

KELLY: (interrupting) But you’re not answering.

SCHIFF: That is really quibbling over terminology. (She tried to interrupt again) Megyn, Megyn, let me finish! He did say it! He said it the very next day. And in the (View) interview that you have now subsequently quoted, where you gave just a little snippet of the president’s comments, he was saying that he didn’t want to get into all the details during the pendency of the investigation. He wasn’t saying this wasn’t a terrorist attack. And to claim that that abbreviated sentence that you’re relying on, (Kelly tried to interrupt again), means something different, I think is just misleading.

I believe that Kelly knew darned well she was being ridiculous. Hence her dropping this sort-of acknowledgment that she was acting out someone else’s agenda: "I know many people think these are not legitimate questions but others do."

And here was Schiff’s great comeback:

With all due respect to the insatiable interest in this on Fox News and with my three senate colleagues, we have just received yet another report, this time a bi-partisan report from the Senate Intelligence Committee, saying there was no cover up, there was no politicization. …When will you take no for an answer? When will you take there’s nothing there for an answer?

And then, after several minutes of fevered theatrics on the issue, Kelly suddenly claimed she wasn’t the one who cared: "Take it up with the senators, sir. I’m not the one who wrote this letter. These are the senators on this committee who are upset about this."

SCHIFF: …If you look at the actual work product of the committee, they don’t agree with the thrust of that letter. The work product of that committee debunks for the umpteenth time this conspiracy theory. …Megyn, you would have to believe that General Petraeus was lying, that (CIA) Director Morrell was lying, that Director of National Intelligence Clapper was lying – and they were all lying. Why? Because they all wanted jobs in the future in a Hillary Clinton administration? It’s a preposterous theory.

… We ought to keep our focus on where are we in the hunt for bringing these people to justice. …The Benghazi conspiracy theories are a terrible distraction to the work that we need to be doing to bring these people to justice.

And that, I submit, is the tragedy after the tragedy here.

Watch the full discussion below.

Follow @NewsHounds

Follow @NewsHoundEllen


Do you like this post?
Tweet

Showing 17 reactions



    Review the site rules
Brian Derrick commented 2014-02-10 09:56:03 -0500 · Flag
Thanks for the further clarification Ellen. I just discovered ‘Newshounds’ and I’m pleased that you have taken (and continue to take) Fox News to task… their manipulation of facts, one-sided reporting and promulgation of untruths is breathtaking. The idea that I no longer have to watch Fox to see their tactics exposed is a relief, to say the least. Thanks again.
Ellen commented 2014-02-10 01:47:27 -0500 · Flag
Brian,

It was not I who said Bush used “act of terror.” It was one of our regulars and I forget which one now. But thanks for finding it.

Robert Anderson, you keep making snide remarks about us as being somehow deluded but we keep making our case with facts whereas you do not. You have insisted Leon Panetta told President Obama Benghazi was a terrorist attack but your first link was to nothing. Your link to FactCheck says, basically, that Panetta eventually came to the conclusion that terrorists were partly involved in the planning of the attack (which, by the way, does not discount anything that either the Obama administration or the NY Times or the official investigations said). It does not say he told President Obama that the night of the attack.

So since you are unable to prove your case – despite accusing us of being closed to reality, I am going to assume you cannot make your case and will not respond to you further.
Brian Derrick commented 2014-02-09 11:02:03 -0500 · Flag
You are correct, Ellen:

Public Papers of the Presidents
George W. Bush<br>2001: Book II
George W. Bush
2001: Book II

“Good evening. Today our fellow citizens, our way of life, our very freedom came under attack in a series of deliberate and deadly terrorist acts. The victims were in airplanes or in their offices: secretaries, business men and women, military and Federal workers, moms and dads, friends and neighbors. Thousands of lives were suddenly ended by evil, despicable acts of terror…”

http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=58057
Brian Derrick commented 2014-02-09 10:33:36 -0500 · Flag
He not only said it wasn’t “mob action” (implying it was not some spontaneous attack), he also left open the possibility that Al Qaeda was involved.

Regrardless, If you too believe “an act of terror” is NOT a “terrorist act,” there’s really nothing left to say except “good luck with your future attempts at reading comprehension.”
Brian Derrick commented 2014-02-09 09:59:13 -0500 · Flag
The question still stands: he did call it an act of terror on 9/12 in the rose garden. Kelly asks “why did he not do that on ‘The View’?”
He didn’t, but he also didn’t say it wasn’t a terror attack either… in fact he implicates other “extremeist groups” in addition to Al Qaeda:

JB:“I heard Hillary Clinton said it was an act of terror. What did you say?”

BO:"Well, we’re still doing an investigation, There is no doubt that, the kind of weapons that were used… the ongoing assault wasn’t just a “mob” action… Now we don’t have all the information yet, so were still gathering it, but what’s clear is that around the world there’s still a lot of threats there… we must stay on top of not just Al Qaeda, but other fringe groups… in that vacuum, what you see are these extremists trying to take advantage."

starts at at 11:00

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hdn1iX1a528
Ellen commented 2014-02-09 03:33:14 -0500 · Flag
Your link goes to the Daily News homepage.
Ellen commented 2014-02-08 18:27:16 -0500 · Flag
Robert Anderson, Please reveal the source of your inside information (that nobody else seems to have) about what Panetta told Obama.
Ellen commented 2014-02-08 02:29:11 -0500 · Flag
Scott from Toronto, that was also an excellent suggestion.
mj - the same one commented 2014-02-07 23:10:42 -0500 · Flag
“Hilarious libs with their heads buried in the sand. She ripped this mental midget to shreds. Denial of this is a strong indicator that you are a liberal lemming in denial. Watch the clip.”

Funny how its only on Planet Wingnut that constant interruption to repeat the same nonsense (“An ‘Act of Terror’ is NOT Synonymous with ‘Terrorist Attack!’”) constitutes “ripping somebody to shreds” . . .

.
Sandman2 commented 2014-02-07 18:14:16 -0500 · Flag
If I were to stop to help Megyn Kelly while she was parked along the side of the road, should I ask if she has a flat tire or should I ask if that tire went flat?
The reason I ask is because she and Robert Anderson probably think those are completely contrary things, which they are not.
Ellen commented 2014-02-07 16:17:59 -0500 · Flag
d d, you are absolutely right… great point. Schiff (and all Democrats on Fox) should have turned it around and put Kelly on the defensive.
truman commented 2014-02-07 11:20:40 -0500 · Flag
As long as Hillary Clinton remains a strong Presidential candidate, Skanky Megyn will play her silly semantic games. Act of terror…terrorist act.
Thx4 Fish commented 2014-02-07 11:01:40 -0500 · Flag
Agree d d: Fox wants to surgically target Obama as a liar over this when there are many more people who made the same statements. Leading Fox to list of all those who lied about Benghazi would be an excellent way to shut down at least part of their argument. Then they can continue on with the very silly semantic discussion of “Act of Terror” v “Terrorist Act.”

Adam Schiff was a great Dem spokesman to put on Fox. He easily and logically answered all questions very well, leaving Megan to look flustered, desperate and ultimately silly.
d d commented 2014-02-07 09:31:34 -0500 · Flag
SCHIFF: “…Megyn, you would have to believe that General Petraeus was lying, that (CIA) Director Morrell was lying, that Director of National Intelligence Clapper was lying – and they were all lying.”
-—————

And when someone on the left like Schiff pushes back with this kind of logical argument, I’d love to see them take it one step further and ask Megyn (or whoever the FOX “news” talking head happens to be) if SHE believes that all 3 of these men must have been lying. Or if she thinks that the 3 GOP Senators who wrote the letter believe that these 3 men were lying.

Don’t just throw out the obvious line of thought that, in order for the right-wing cover-up/conspiracy theory to work, all 3 of these men would have to be lying only to let Megyn wave away your very valid point. Turn the tables on them and demand that SHE (or any of the FOX “news” talkers) answer YOUR question if they plan to continue pushing their “unanswered questions” agenda. Put them on the spot and hold them accountable for their accusations.

@scott from Toronto – excellent suggestion. This right-wing/FOX “news” meme that an act of terror and a terrorist attack are not the same thing is laughingly idiotic and reeks of ring-wing desperation.
Homeboy Halligan commented 2014-02-07 08:53:40 -0500 · Flag
Back to back Hannity on primetime Fox. The Blonde Hannity Show followed by the Sean Hannity Show. 2 hours of hatemongering incompetence. 3 if you add psycho Billy to the mix.
Scott from Toronto commented 2014-02-07 08:16:28 -0500 · Flag
I’m wondering if Megyn Kelly can provide us with a few examples of when something was a “terrorist attack” but NOT an “act of terror”. You know, just to support her claim that they mean two separate things.
NewsHounds posted about Megyn Kelly Scolds On Benghazi: ‘Act Of Terror’ Is Not Synonymous With ‘Terrorist Attack!’ on NewsHounds' Facebook page 2014-02-07 00:20:59 -0500
Watch Democrat Adam Schiff nicely smack her down!








or sign in with Facebook or email.
Follow @NewsHounds on Twitter
Subscribe with RSS


We’ve updated our Privacy Policy
Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Created with NationBuilder