If Debbie Wasserman Schultz’ appearance on Fox & Friends this morning is any indication of how an Obama vs. Romney campaign would go, it’s looking good for Obama! As DWS bonus points, she gets in quite a few good digs at Fox, too!
Do you like this post?
Janet Tuhey commented
2012-01-20 19:58:13 -0500
· Flag
Scott Orloff commented- “Iâm waiting for the Foxnation headline: âFox and Friends Obliterates DWS!!â â should be any minute now.”
Fux Murkins headline –
“Fox & Friends’ Epic Smack Down on Debbie Wasserman Schultz”
Fux Murkins headline –
“Fox & Friends’ Epic Smack Down on Debbie Wasserman Schultz”
doors17 commented
2012-01-20 15:55:55 -0500
· Flag
I just read this comment from The Huffington Post that I thought was funny. Itâs from getoffmysideâ¦
Debbie Wasserman-¬Schultz in a battle of wits against two unarmed opponents.
Debbie Wasserman-¬Schultz in a battle of wits against two unarmed opponents.
Janet Tuhey commented
2012-01-20 15:49:58 -0500
· Flag
DWS mops the floor with Pinky and the Brain every time. While she is giving articulate answers and keeping her cool, they get more and more upset. They (and all of their cohorts in slime) never seem to get the message that she is never going to allow them to play by their rules. I love her snarky send off.
doors17 commented
2012-01-20 15:36:18 -0500
· Flag
Itâs so comical and predicable how they keep trying to cut her off and step on her replies when sheâs asked question in order to quickly change the subject since she making valid points. How dare she tell the truth. The nerve of that woman. When itâs an R being questioned they never seem to have an issue with allowing them all the time they need.
John King of CNN did exactly the right thing last night by asking the question right at the beginning. How could he ignore it? When would be the right time Brain and Steve?
Oh and Brian, where did your mother and I go wrong? Your metaphor of using John Edwards as an example that the liberal media would never ask him about âhis rumorsâ for a very simple reasonâ¦we didnât know about it when he was the VP nominee in â04 or when he ran for President in â08. It wasnât until after he dropped out that we learned what scumbag he was to his beautiful late wife, Elizabeth. Iâm not defending Edwards, all his wounds are self-inflected, as are Newtâs, but at least get the timeline right.
John King of CNN did exactly the right thing last night by asking the question right at the beginning. How could he ignore it? When would be the right time Brain and Steve?
Oh and Brian, where did your mother and I go wrong? Your metaphor of using John Edwards as an example that the liberal media would never ask him about âhis rumorsâ for a very simple reasonâ¦we didnât know about it when he was the VP nominee in â04 or when he ran for President in â08. It wasnât until after he dropped out that we learned what scumbag he was to his beautiful late wife, Elizabeth. Iâm not defending Edwards, all his wounds are self-inflected, as are Newtâs, but at least get the timeline right.
NewsHounds
posted
about Fox & Friends Try, But Fail, To Get The Best Of Debbie Wasserman Schultz On Mitt Romney’s Job-Creating Record
on NewsHounds' Facebook page
2012-01-20 13:48:38 -0500
Fox & Friends Try, But Fail, To Get The Best Of Debbie Wasserman Schultz On Mitt Romneyâs Job-Creating Record
Antoinette commented
2012-01-20 13:47:40 -0500
· Flag
This is what I’m talking about! Wasserman Schultz spanked these Fox “News” frauds, and made fools out of them. Masterful!
Schultz—“Please let me answer the question!”
This is how you deal with this Murdoch/Ailes puppets. Control the conservation and don’t let them bait you.
NOTE TO FOX AND FOOLS
You two clowns are best suited on LogoTV.
Schultz—“Please let me answer the question!”
This is how you deal with this Murdoch/Ailes puppets. Control the conservation and don’t let them bait you.
NOTE TO FOX AND FOOLS
You two clowns are best suited on LogoTV.
