NewsHounds
We watch Fox so you don't have to!
  • Home
  • About
  • Forum
  • Archives
  • Blogroll
  • Donate
  • Shop
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
Home →

Does Fox News Wish Hillary Clinton Had Won The Election?

Posted by Ellen -7835.60pc on September 06, 2017 · Flag

MacCallum_Bossie_090517.png

Fox News is so obsessed with smearing Hillary Clinton, you’d think she was the most powerful woman in the free world and not their guy, Donald Trump.

As I reported last night, Sean Hannity made Clinton’s emails, and former FBI Director James Comey’s decision not to prosecute her over them, the top story despite escalating tensions with North Korea, Hurricane Irma bearing down on the U.S., Trump’s repeal of DACA and Hurricane Harvey still impacting Houston.

But Hannity is far from the only Fox News host who can’t get over the fact that Clinton lost the election and holds no public office. The Story with Martha MacCallum spent so much time talking about Clinton’s new book last night, I wondered if it had been published by one of Fox’s sister companies (it wasn’t) and the network was actively promoting it under the theory that no publicity is bad publicity.

Although Fox calls MacCallum an “anchor,” as opposed to (opinion) host, and suggests The Story is objective, the only guest to discuss Clinton’s book last night was Trump’s deputy campaign manager, David Bossie. He's a birther who has made a career out of smearing and lying. He’s also a Fox News contributor.

MacCallum spent more than two minutes teasing the attack, I mean discussion, with clips and jabs at Clinton before Bossie had a chance to open his mouth. I’ll spare you the details of their “analysis” but the gist was Clinton's audacity of criticizing and blaming Bernie Sanders in her new book. Whatever you think of that (I don't like it) I can assure you that Fox would be smearing Sanders just as heartily, if not more so, had he won the nomination or the presidency. Fox would probably be defending Clinton's attack now if Sanders had won the 2016 election.

In fact, Bossie gave a hint of how much Fox would be hating on Sanders had it been expedient for Fox. Bossie suggested Sanders is behind the rise of Antifa, saying its members “are the Bernie Sanders supporters” whom he “riled up” during the 2016 primary.

But that was off message. MacCallum quickly ended that line of discussion.

With less than a minute left, she got around to asking Bossie about Trump’s repeal of DACA. That move caused chaos, stress and fear to 800,000 young residents, known as Dreamers, who did not come here by choice. The repeal could also cost the country hundreds of billions of dollars. Even most Trump supporters approved of DACA.

I think we can guess why MacCallum and Fox News would rather talk about Clinton. But I'm sorry, Fox, your guy won and no amount of Clinton talk can take away from his growing unpopularity with his base.

Watch Fox News’ priorities on display below, from the September 5, 2017 The Story with Martha MacCallum.

Follow @NewsHounds

Follow @NewsHoundEllen


Do you like this post?
Tweet

Showing 8 reactions



    Review the site rules
Jack Loiis commented 2017-12-17 00:50:19 -0500 · Flag
Thanks for posting this information since I do not like watching Fox haha I really like the site, I always follow. https://vendaspower.com
Bemused commented 2017-09-08 05:34:56 -0400 · Flag
Of course it would have been easier for them had Hillary or any other democrat won the electoral college. Human beings are nasty animals and it’s always easier to hate than to love (as pointedly noted by a Jew called Jesus of Nazareth almost two thousand years ago).
Thx4 Fish commented 2017-09-07 15:34:50 -0400 · Flag
Fox needs a red-meat-enemy for their viewers to tune in for, and they do prefer a female villain, but the Hillary email story is just so stale. I’m sure they are hoping that Nancy Pelosi becomes the Speaker of the House in a couple of years.
ViperT24 commented 2017-09-07 15:20:28 -0400 · Flag
I mean yeah, that’s exactly it. They, like everyone else, were completely sure Hillary was going to win. They had already spent years building up to it and plotting out all the ways they’d rile their base against her for the next eight years. Now what are they supposed to do with all their carefully engineered slander?
Jane S commented 2017-09-07 05:06:49 -0400 · Flag
" Fox calls MacCallum an “anchor,” as opposed to (opinion) host"

Thank you. This drives me nuts. Hannity can just manage semi-competent “anchoring” well into some breaking news event— just barely — but an anchor is an anchor and a host is a host. They’re two entirely different roles and skills.
Jan Hall commented 2017-09-06 16:47:34 -0400 · Flag
Fox Spews has always preferred hating the Democrat rather than defending the Republican.
scooter commented 2017-09-06 16:10:20 -0400 · Flag
Without her they don’t have an enemy with which to rile up the base of idiots.
Antoinette commented 2017-09-06 15:59:59 -0400 · Flag
The Foxies won’t go after Cheating Trumpster for fear of losing the rest of their viewers. These demonic clowns also have burned their britches by attacking Republicans. Not too many Republicans will appear on this sadistic network.

The Foxies are worried.

Breitbart has plans to launch a new network, and the Fox “News” suits are nervous. The day Trumpster tells has followers to watch Breitbart Network will be the end of the Foxies.








or sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Follow @NewsHounds on Twitter
Subscribe with RSS


We’ve updated our Privacy Policy
×
Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Created with NationBuilder