On January 23, 2013, Bill O'Reilly read an email from a woman reacting to his segment on late-term abortion (in which he once again defamed Dr. George Tiller). In response to the woman's criticism of men interfering with women's reproductive choices, O'Reilly scolded: My job is to protect the kids and I will continue to do it.
In his email segment, O'Reilly read an email from “Cindy, I'm withholding your last name, lives in Connecticut:”
O'Reilly, you men have no business telling any woman she can't have an abortion.
The subject was New York State allowing abortions for pretty much any reason in the third trimester, Cindy. If, like Governor Cuomo, you support that, you'd better hope, you'd better hope there's no Judgment Day. My job is to protect the kids and I will continue to do it.
I have also never- not once- seen him “protect the kids” on any other issue that involves them. He doesn’t care about safer play areas, he doesn’t care about better education, he doesn’t care about pediatric health… when something’s newsworthy in these areas, he sides with the person hurting the child. Every time.
If O’Reilly can muster up enough honesty to admit that his sole interest in the abortion/contraception issue is that it’s a front for him to try “putting women in their place” without being called a misogynist, I’ll only bother him again the next time he goes “x” amount over the line, because at least he’s admitting it.
Until then, his so-called academic record is just another lie, as far as I’m concerned. I’ve seen him behave, but I’ve never seen him be as intelligent as they claim.
Sandman; how is that a contradiction? I didnt say I dislike ALL women because some have children to collect governement money. i said I dislike women who have children to collect government money. In no way did I condemn ALL women with that statement.
First, both of those “statements” were YOU’RE words-not mine.
Second, if you can find the word “ALL” in MY statement I’d be happy to appologize.
Lastly, everyone else understood your “contradiction” very clearly and you’re lack of understanding does not help your argument.
You claim incessantly that you want a “debate” but you actually behave like a pre-radio speaker standing on a kitchen stool or soapbox at Hyde Park Corner: declamatory, eyes and especially ears closed tight. The sort of thing one does simply to get a reaction, any sort of reaction as proof that one actually exists.
If I remember my Dr. Spock of anon, that sort of attention-seeking is typical of the age group he called the “terrible twos”, i.e., infants who, being pretty much ignored by their parents, will misbehave in order simply to be noticed … at the cost of being punished. Any attention is better than no attention at all. Time to grow up, lad.
What is it about the law that you don’t understand, U troll? You can scream murder all you want, it doesn’t matter. In fact, scream yourself to death. I really don’t care. Abortion is not murder.
I am toying with our troll.
I am going to put the ball where you fruitcakes want it.
Personhood upon conception.
But when this child is left to survive, you gNOpig clowns call him a moocher.
The stupidity doesn’t end there.
You clowns want the kid to learn about Cheebuz riding on dinosaurs.
And saving itself for marriage.
So, I have to ask again.
Where do you fruitcakes want your football.
Go ahead. Make. My. Day.
You’ll lose that case if you try him for murder.
The baby doesn’t have to be full-term to be a baby once it’s born. otherwise you are correct
Again, you use different wording to justify it for yourself. Pathetic is defending child murder. Pathetic is saying its ok to murder them because you use a technical name for them.
You have been given the definition of “child”. You have been given the definition of “baby”. And you have been given the definition of “fetus”. Either you’re too ignorant to grasp those definitions or you refuse to admit that you are wrong.
And your attempt at trying to label me as a psycho or twisted or hatefilled just because I offer you definitions to support my view, and I refuse to agree with your ignorant views, is pitiful. Honestly, I expected a little more from a troll who tries to pretend that he’s smarter than everyone else in the room.
I can’t help it if you’re too ignorant to grasp the concept that abortion is not murder and a fetus is not a child. You are pathetic.
If you dont have a problem with killing children then it says a lot about you as a human being.
I wouldnt be shocked if some of you watch abortion videos just for kicks.
And so you think that because a woman doesn’t say “im having a fetus” means it’s not a fetus? She would be biologically and scientifically correct if she said “I’m carrying a fetus.” Once the fetus reaches full term and comes out of the uterus, then it is a baby.
Still not getting it? Try this: A child is a young person between infancy and youth. A baby is an extremely young person from birth up to an infant. Abortion is not murder. A fetus is not a child. Aborting a fetus is not killing a child.
What is it then? IT’S NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS is what it is!!!!!
You dont want to call it a child because then you would have to admit that you support killing children; which you do. When they pull out a baby thats 6 months along and shove a pair of scissors in the back of his/her neck thats killing a child.
And I have never claimed to speak for all conservatives. Again, you people lie and make things up to make your point. Hint: when you have to lie to make your point you dont really have one.
When pig Limpo farted his wish for President Obama to fail, HE DID NOT SPEAK FOR CLOWNSERVATIVES.
When the Fox gNOpig Propaganda spends 24/7 attacking President Obama, THEY DON’T SPEAK FOR CLOWNSERVATIVES.
When Billdo bitches, whines, and moans getting back to Mayberry, he doesn’t speak for clownservatives.
Oh, wait. That’s his job.
The paternal authoritarian.
That’s his job.
Not only that, U Troll says that one pig (Lardass Limpbag) does not speak for the entire party, but then U troll himself claims to speak for all conservatives and claims he knows what all conservatives want.
Doesn’t make a lot of sense, does it? Neither does orally and those who present those half-assed “arguments” as facts and/or moral guidance.
The bottom line is, if you are not female, you really have zero say. Well, maybe one sperm-cell’s worth of influence, that would be it.
First, you said you’d never heard of a neocon/teabagger calling children moochers. I point out to you that your hero Lardass Limpbag did. Stop being a lazy little troll and look it up for yourself. Go to his Rotundness’ archives and look it up. I’m not here to do your dirty work, troll.
Oh, and by the way, your hero Lardass Limpbag does speak for your entire party. He’s said so himself that he speaks for your entire party. In fact, he forms all your opinions for you.