O’Reilly thinks rape victims “ask for it,” and loves to go after women at every turn- Including that he has more venom in his voice talking about lesbians than male gays.

I have also never- not once- seen him “protect the kids” on any other issue that involves them. He doesn’t care about safer play areas, he doesn’t care about better education, he doesn’t care about pediatric health… when something’s newsworthy in these areas, he sides with the person hurting the child. Every time.

If O’Reilly can muster up enough honesty to admit that his sole interest in the abortion/contraception issue is that it’s a front for him to try “putting women in their place” without being called a misogynist, I’ll only bother him again the next time he goes “x” amount over the line, because at least he’s admitting it.

Until then, his so-called academic record is just another lie, as far as I’m concerned. I’ve seen him behave, but I’ve never seen him be as intelligent as they claim.

It should read YOUR. My bad.

U Mad? commented 21 hours ago· Flag
Sandman; how is that a contradiction? I didnt say I dislike ALL women because some have children to collect governement money. i said I dislike women who have children to collect government money. In no way did I condemn ALL women with that statement.

First, both of those “statements” were YOU’RE words-not mine.
Second, if you can find the word “ALL” in MY statement I’d be happy to appologize.
Lastly, everyone else understood your “contradiction” very clearly and you’re lack of understanding does not help your argument.

@vacuous Offkilter (aka U Mad?/I Mad!):

You claim incessantly that you want a “debate” but you actually behave like a pre-radio speaker standing on a kitchen stool or soapbox at Hyde Park Corner: declamatory, eyes and especially ears closed tight. The sort of thing one does simply to get a reaction, any sort of reaction as proof that one actually exists.

If I remember my Dr. Spock of anon, that sort of attention-seeking is typical of the age group he called the “terrible twos”, i.e., infants who, being pretty much ignored by their parents, will misbehave in order simply to be noticed … at the cost of being punished. Any attention is better than no attention at all. Time to grow up, lad.

U troll. yes, you are pathetic. Resorting to calling someone psycho, hatefilled and a murderer because you fail to convince them that they need to see things your way, is pathetic. For the last time…abortion is not murder. As Tom Wilson says, if you try someone for murder for having an abortion, you will lose your case.

What is it about the law that you don’t understand, U troll? You can scream murder all you want, it doesn’t matter. In fact, scream yourself to death. I really don’t care. Abortion is not murder.

Thank you, Tom.

I am toying with our troll.

AAP- The Catholic Church took that stance until this week…when money was involved

OK.

I am going to put the ball where you fruitcakes want it.

Personhood upon conception.

Ya? Vale?

But when this child is left to survive, you gNOpig clowns call him a moocher.

The stupidity doesn’t end there.

You clowns want the kid to learn about Cheebuz riding on dinosaurs.

And saving itself for marriage.

So, I have to ask again.

Where do you fruitcakes want your football.

At conception?

Go ahead. Make. My. Day.

U Mad-
You’ll lose that case if you try him for murder.
Visitor 55-
The baby doesn’t have to be full-term to be a baby once it’s born. otherwise you are correct

Im pathetic? You’re the one trying to justify child murder by calling it another name. It is what it is. They are children. You can call it the technical name all day, but it doesnt change the fact that they are children. If your wife was 7 months pregnant and someone stabbed your child through her stomach, killing him/her would you shrug it off as ok because it was just a fetus? Should that person be charged with murder or just assault?

Again, you use different wording to justify it for yourself. Pathetic is defending child murder. Pathetic is saying its ok to murder them because you use a technical name for them.

U Troll.

You have been given the definition of “child”. You have been given the definition of “baby”. And you have been given the definition of “fetus”. Either you’re too ignorant to grasp those definitions or you refuse to admit that you are wrong.

And your attempt at trying to label me as a psycho or twisted or hatefilled just because I offer you definitions to support my view, and I refuse to agree with your ignorant views, is pitiful. Honestly, I expected a little more from a troll who tries to pretend that he’s smarter than everyone else in the room.

I can’t help it if you’re too ignorant to grasp the concept that abortion is not murder and a fetus is not a child. You are pathetic.

Ive seen it all now. “Aborting a fetus is not killing a child”. Only some twisted, hate filled psycho could condone killing children by claiming they’re not really children.

If you dont have a problem with killing children then it says a lot about you as a human being.

I wouldnt be shocked if some of you watch abortion videos just for kicks.

@u troll, a fetus is a fetus. It is not a child. A fetus growing inside a woman is not a child. It is a fetus. A fetus inside a cat’s uterus is not a kitten. It is a fetus. A fetus growing inside a dog is not a puppy. It is a fetus. A fetus growing inside a horse is not a pony. It is a fetus. A fetus growing inside a whale is not a calf. it is a fetus. A fetus is an unborn or unhatched vertebrate. Is this all making sense to you? A fetus is not a child, kitten, puppy, pony, or calf.

And so you think that because a woman doesn’t say “im having a fetus” means it’s not a fetus? She would be biologically and scientifically correct if she said “I’m carrying a fetus.” Once the fetus reaches full term and comes out of the uterus, then it is a baby.

Still not getting it? Try this: A child is a young person between infancy and youth. A baby is an extremely young person from birth up to an infant. Abortion is not murder. A fetus is not a child. Aborting a fetus is not killing a child.

A fetus is not a child? What is it then? A kitten? Ive never heard a woman say “im having a fetus”.

What is it then? IT’S NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS is what it is!!!!!

UMAD — even the Catholic Church says that Fetuses are NOTPEOPLE: www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/25/catholic-hospital-fetus-n_n_255…

A fetus is not a child? What is it then? A kitten? Ive never heard a woman say “im having a fetus”.

You dont want to call it a child because then you would have to admit that you support killing children; which you do. When they pull out a baby thats 6 months along and shove a pair of scissors in the back of his/her neck thats killing a child.

And I have never claimed to speak for all conservatives. Again, you people lie and make things up to make your point. Hint: when you have to lie to make your point you dont really have one.

UMAD — You think killing a fetus is murder? Fine — Don’t have an abortion. Leave the rest of us alone.

Sure.

When pig Limpo farted his wish for President Obama to fail, HE DID NOT SPEAK FOR CLOWNSERVATIVES.

When the Fox gNOpig Propaganda spends 24/7 attacking President Obama, THEY DON’T SPEAK FOR CLOWNSERVATIVES.

When Billdo bitches, whines, and moans getting back to Mayberry, he doesn’t speak for clownservatives.

Oh, wait. That’s his job.

The paternal authoritarian.

That’s his job.

@sandman 2 – "Kinda contradict yourself @umad with previous remarks of condemning the many for the acts of the few. "

Not only that, U Troll says that one pig (Lardass Limpbag) does not speak for the entire party, but then U troll himself claims to speak for all conservatives and claims he knows what all conservatives want.

@u Troll. A fetus is not a child. Abortion is not murder; it is a legal medical procedure.