NewsHounds
We watch Fox so you don't have to!
  • Home
  • About
  • Naughty Corner
  • Forum
  • Archives
  • Blogroll
  • Donate
  • Shop
  • Contact
Home →

Forbes On Fox Christmas Spirit: Let’s Privatize Pensions!

Posted by Brian -34pc on December 26, 2012 · Flag

On Saturday’s Forbes on Fox (12/22/12), David Asman crowed about how he and his panel “all agree” that the “solution” to pension problems is to privatize them. Oh, they didn’t use the word “privatize.” Instead, they talked up switching from pension plans to 401(k)s.

In April, The Week reported about 401(k)s

They’re failing to provide enough money for older Americans. As the country’s principal way to save for retirement, the 401(k) program allows employees to set aside a portion of their paychecks, often supplemented with matching funds from their employers, and to defer taxes until they start withdrawing funds. But most of the nearly 80 million baby boomers — the oldest of whom are just now starting to turn 65 — haven’t put aside nearly enough, and are in danger of exhausting their savings within a few years of retirement. “It has already become clear,” said Karen Friedman, of the Pension Rights Center in Washington, D.C., “that 401(k)s have failed millions of Americans.”

Somehow, that never came up in the discussion.

Steve Forbes said, “The nice thing about a 401(k) is you reap what you put in there, eat what you put in there. And that way, if you make a grand promise, and you don’t put the money in, everyone knows it’s a false promise. Let’s have some honesty and so when you are promised something, you know you’re going to get it.”

Host David Asman, who’s supposed to be the objective one, wasn’t. He said, “Rick (Ungar), a lot of people have 401(k)s, they’re doing pretty well with them.”

Ungar was the lone doubter. But he seemed resigned. “Yeah, you know, this is the way we’re heading whether we like it or not. Look, I can remember as a very young lawyer writing some of the first ERISA plans where we had very high hopes that by forming these multi-corporation pension plans, you’d have smart people as trustees running them, they’d make lots of money. It didn’t work out that way. They weren’t that smart, they lost money.” At the end, he was nodding along with the rest of the group.

Mike Ozanian laughably said, “Let’s take the politics out of this.” He added, “What a 401(k) does, David, it doesn’t guarantee you a huge return, but it forces an honest debate on how much taxpayer money you’re willing to put towards public employees because that money is paid that year, and as Steve pointed out, not some crazy promise in the future that’s never going to come true.”

Asman added, “You know what I like about 401(k)s, as opposed to these massive pension plans, is that it gives more discretion to the individual. The individual decides what’s best or not for him.”

Bill Baldwin said, “What if the individual wants a classic traditional defined benefit pension? I wouldn’t outlaw pensions, I would just outlaw the bailouts… If Delta wants to ladle out lavish benefits to its pilots, fine, but don’t come to me the taxpayer when it doesn’t work out.”

Rich Karlgaard said, “The better idea is to move people to 401(k)s, and you can take the risk. Steve has talked about this before, by limiting the options that people have so they’re not going to get great returns, but they’re not going to lose money either.”

“Objective” Asman added, “Steve, they’ll get better returns than the Social Security’s giving them right?”

Forbes agreed. “By 2-3 fold if you start out as a young person, and this way too, you have sensible rules... None of this one size fits all.”

Asman concluded by saying, “This is a nice Christmas segment. Even Rick is nodding his head, we all agree on this, terrific, we’ve got the solution.”


Do you like this post?
Tweet
submit to reddit

Showing 10 reactions



    Review the site rules
Average American Patriot commented 2012-12-26 23:28:11 -0500 · Flag
Socialize the losses!

Privatize the profits!

Ho ho ho!
Sandman2 commented 2012-12-26 23:10:17 -0500 · Flag
Less than 2 months before the Great Bush Recession of 2008 my company had an “investment” meeting where one of the managers of our 401K spoke to all the assembled employees. There were already fears of economic downturns, and some of the folks were nearing retirement. So those same folks started asking him questions: Should I move my money into some sort of safe index fund? Should I take it out now and suffer the penalty or try to hang on?
This guy gave a piece of advice that most people sitting in that room nearly swallowed there tounge’s.

No you shouldn’t take that money out or try to move it, YOU SHOULD BE PUTTING MORE OF YOUR OWN MONEY INTO THOSE INVESTMENTS.

Even us midwest hicks can smell a fraud when we see it. Right or wrong, this is how I see the investment world from my small midwest town. They will say anything to make a buck off of us(the lowly investor) even if it hurts people, particularly those close to retirement.
Remember when they, the Republicans, talked about “privatizing” Social Security?
Letting Wallstreet get there hands on that money would be even worse than 08’.
Aria Prescott commented 2012-12-26 20:53:22 -0500 · Flag
Well, we know Forbes and Asman still haven’t seen “The Dark Knight Rises.” Otherwise they would remember the scene where they put the corporate CEOs on trial for using the Dent Act to privatize the city without the people’s knowledge, and blowing off the consent of the ones that found out.

When they get what they want, I hope they don’t slip on the ice.
Robert Urban commented 2012-12-26 19:04:37 -0500 · Flag
Another thing I find amazing is that it’s ‘to early’ to talk about gun control after the LAST massacre, but banks and lending institutions are STILL being sued for illegal business practices and these people want us to go ALL IN with our life savings before any of that crap is sorted out. The mindset of these idiots would confound the likes of B.F. Skinner, and Albert Einstien. People who beat their heads against the same wall of ignorance, over and over.
Robert Urban commented 2012-12-26 18:46:27 -0500 · Flag
Conservative/Investor logic:
Hey, it’s been 4 years since everybody lost 1/2 their 401k/403b money during the Bush Administration. Americans won’t remember THAT.
News to Conservatives:
Attention Deficit Disorder is an affliction that effects people, ages 3-17, (non voters) NOT working class 18-65 year olds (voters). For 2 1/2 years, every month, I not only lost every contribution I made into my 403b, but I also got principle pulled, probably to pay for these peoples bonuses.

These self serving people think of nothing but the money THEY can make off of these funds. And they make it weather you lose all of YOUR investment or not.
Maybe we should stop worrying about our schools teaching Creationism, and force them to teach Aesop’s Fables. There’s a good one about the ‘Fox guarding the Henhouse’.
Sandman2 commented 2012-12-26 18:33:24 -0500 · Flag
Asman added, “You know what I like about 401(k)s, as opposed to these massive pension plans, is that it gives more discretion to the individual. The individual decides what’s best or not for him.”

Yes, discretion. Do I want to “hand over” this much money($$$) to Wallstreet, or do I want to “hand over” this much money($$$$) to Wallstreet?
Choices, choices, choices…
sandman1 commented 2012-12-26 17:59:10 -0500 · Flag
One of David K Johnstons’ books had several examples of how poorly 401Ks’ do compared to a normal pension. The real goal of 401K programs are to separate companies from any responsability for any retiree. It’s a win/win for executives.
Joseph West commented 2012-12-26 16:55:55 -0500 · Flag
Bill Baldwin said, “What if the individual wants a classic traditional defined benefit pension? I wouldn’t outlaw pensions, I would just outlaw the bailouts… If Delta wants to ladle out lavish benefits to its pilots, fine, but don’t come to me the taxpayer when it doesn’t work out.”


And, Mr Baldwin, might I ask your opinion of when the COMPANY EXECUTIVES rob the pension funds to help pay out “bonuses” for the self-same executives or they simply “borrow” from the funds to pay for other things, then simply “forget” to repay the “loan” before they go into Chapter 13 bankruptcy? Or when the company gets that “bailout” and turns around and pays millions to both the executives who were responsible for needing the “bailout” in the first place and to the shareholders before paying off their remaining debts (which they got reduced to pennies on the dollar during the bankruptcy hearings)?

I’m sure you don’t have problems with the CORPORATE “pensions” being paid for by the taxpayers—just the “overpaid” proletariat who seem to think they should have access to luxuries like affordable housing and healthcare and fresh produce and toasters and microwave ovens and toothpicks. No. Let’s ensure that the Delta CEO doesn’t lose his three summer houses and his four yachts and his two private jets and his ski lodge when Delta needs a bailout—but heaven forbid that a taxpayer bailout go to the pilots’ and flight attendants’ and baggage handlers’ pensions. Isn’t that right, Mr Baldwin?
truman commented 2012-12-26 15:15:04 -0500 · Flag
Pensions? Bah humbug. If you need food and housing after you retire, just do what little Stevie Forbes does. Dip into that massive trust fund that your rich daddy set up before he croaked.
NewsHounds posted about Forbes On Fox Christmas Spirit: Let’s Privatize Pensions! on NewsHounds' Facebook page 2012-12-26 14:30:50 -0500
Ho, ho, ho!
blog advertising is good for you






or sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Subscribe with RSS

Make Custom Gifts at CafePress


Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Created with NationBuilder