Fox News Sunday discussed entitlement reform and “the swing states that could decide the general election” today with two Republican governors, Terry Branstad of Iowa and Rick Scott of Florida. No Democrats took part. When asked about how to deal with people who don't have health insurance, Scott replied that "The way to fix that" is to put patients in privately-owned managed care organizations (one of which he just may have a financial interest in) "which will help make sure they get to a primary care doctor or get to a specialist... so they don’t end up in an emergency room."
Before getting to health care reform, Scott and Branstad attacked the Obama administration for proposing state waivers against work requirements for welfare reform. Host Brit Hume dubiously said the waivers “stirred so much interest at the end of the week.” If so, I must have missed that interest hiding under rumors that Condoleezza Rice might be Mitt Romney’s VP pick and all the talk about his ties to Bain Capital and his tax returns. I’m sure it’s just a coincidence that the subject offered the guests an opportunity to attack Obama as opposed to, say, defending Romney.
Branstad said he thinks Obama’s plan is “illegal.”
Scott agreed. He said, “Personal responsibility is very important.” Well, unless you’re the head of a hospital chain that paid the largest-ever Medicare fraud fines. When Scott was ousted as CEO and chairman of the board of Columbia/HCA, two weeks after federal agents raided the company for documents as part of its fraud investigation, he walked away with a benefits package estimated at close to $10 million, as the Sarasota, Florida Herald Tribune reported.
The Herald Tribune also noted:
Scott says on his website that “mistakes” were made at Columbia/HCA and that he takes “responsibility” for what happened.
Otherwise, he’s been evasive on his role in the fraud. He repeatedly tells people to go to his website to get his side of the story, then quickly tries to move on to other subjects. Throughout the campaign, he has dodged debates and media interviews.
Not that Hume brought up any of those pesky details. He moved on to the subject of Medicaid expansion and the right of states to opt out.
The New York Times says that Scott’s announcement that he will reject the expansion has caused a big pushback from advocates for the poor and some parts of the healthcare industry, including hospitals. Pointing out that more than 20% of Florida’s 19 million residents lack health insurance, the Times wrote:
Despite the governor’s statements, leaders of the Republican-controlled state Legislature have not outright rejected the expansion, saying they will study their options over the coming months before making a decision…
Without the expansion, Mr. Rueben (president of the Florida Hospital Association) and others in the health care industry said, the cost of uncompensated care — emergency treatment for those who are uninsured and cannot afford to pay — will continue to spiral upward and more costs will be shifted to the insured. Jackson Health System, the safety-net hospital system in Miami, provided more than $450 million in uncompensated care last year.
Predictably, Scott told Wallace that instead of expanding Medicaid, he’d rather offer “more choice,” tax breaks and “getting people back to work so they can afford their own health care.” Never mind that it’s harder than ever to afford health care whether you’re working or not. According to New Times Broward-Palm Beach (via Mother Jones),
The cost of living has increased 67 percent since 1990 while wages have risen only 21 percent, …(P)roductivity has risen without any comparative increase in income for the low or middle classes, (and) the share of American after-tax income has shifted drastically toward top earners since the late ‘70s.
Hume did press Scott a bit by asking, "Hospitals are saying now… that if you don’t have Medicaid expansion, the uninsured people are gonna continue to turn up in large numbers at hospital emergency rooms expecting and, by law, required to get treatment. That money’s gonna come out of the… people that do have insurance or out of the hide of the hospitals. So if you don’t expand Medicaid, what are you gonna do about that problem?”
Scott answered, “Well, the way to fix that is what we’ve already proposed… is a Medicaid expansion across the state where the Medicaid population will be taken care of by managed care organizations which will help make sure they get to a primary care doctor or get to a specialist so they’ll, so they don’t end up in an emergency room. That’s the way to fix it. “
And if they get into a car accident, have a child that suddenly develops a high fever or, come down with heat stroke because they can’t afford air conditioning, then what? Hume didn’t ask. Nor did he point out a few inconvenient truths about Scott’s plan: Georgetown University studied the pilot programs already in place in Florida and found, “There is no clear evidence that the pilot programs are saving money, and if they are, whether it is through efficiencies or at the expense of needed care.” Also, as Mother Jones reported last year, Scott, himself, stands to personally benefit from this program, via an urgent-care company called Solantic. Scott founded Solantic not long after he was ousted from Columbia/HCA and turned over his $62 million stake to his wife in January, 2011.
Mother Jones also reported in 2011:
Scott’s current proposal aims to save the state $1 billion by drastically overhauling Medicaid, allowing private managed care companies to bid for contracts rather than paying traditional fee-for-services. The majority of Medicaid patients receive care through private companies and HMOs, but under Florida’s bill such firms would end up having vast new authority over the program, with great leeway to limit access to services or reduce benefits. The bill would also put a hard cap on the amount of money that these managed care companies could spend on Medicaid, which advocates say could particularly harm disabled and elderly patients who require costlier long-term care.
“Death Panels,” anyone? It seems an obvious question to Scott’s “solution.” But Hume never raised it.
Even with the new health care laws that leave 20 million people with no cover.
It about time that the USA come into the real world and start to look after it Citizens ,I know the NHS has it faults but at lease we can get treated even if we poor or living on the street.
I’m so glade that I live in London instead of the USA.
At lease I don’t have to worry about being insured .
Another standard GOP reply…tax breaks and getting people back to work. However, taxes are at or close to the lowest they’ve ever been in the country, and the GOP house of representatives has blocked The President’s jobs plan while introducing exactly
1. If you are not rich, don’t get sick.
2. If you do get sick, die quickly.
I love pissing off RW quacks by bringing up Jaques Roy, who managed to get $375 million on pure fraud before he was caught in two days off adaptations to the health care laws:
But by all means, Let’s hear more from them.
And yet, the deformed freak wants to “put patients in privately-owned managed care”. How exactly is that considered “personal responsibility”?
And yes, I’m pretty sure that a corrupt, unethical pig like scott does own interest in one of those privately-owned managed care facilities. Why else would the pig even suggest it?