NewsHounds
We watch Fox so you don't have to!
  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Forum
  • Blogroll
  • Donate
  • Shop
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
Home →

Watch This Democrat Call Out Fox For Making Michael Cohen Pay-To-Play About Hillary Clinton

Posted by Ellen -7859.80pc on May 11, 2018 · Flag

The Outnumbered cohosts just couldn’t stop talking about Hillary Clinton during a discussion that was ostensibly about the millions of dollars that have been funneled to Trump attorney and fixer Michael Cohen in an apparent pay-to-play scheme.

Right in her introduction, cohost Melissa Francis revealed the game of deflection: She began by rightly summing up where the story is now by saying, it’s about “who was doing what for money.” But she wanted to talk about Clinton at least as much. “I want to get to the bottom of it because to me, this is as smelly as The Clinton Foundation and I hated that. I don’t like pay-for-play in any corner. We didn’t want Hillary Clinton doing it. We don’t want anyone else doing it either.”

Guest Zac Petkanas did a great job of describing the seriousness of the situation which includes half a million dollars paid to Cohen, within weeks of the election, from a business tied to a Russian oligarch under sanctions for interfering with the 2016 election. But just as importantly, Petkanas called out Fox’s tactics, something every Democrat should do who appears on the network.

As soon as he finished, Francis turned to her cohost and said, “Absolutely, Kennedy, and that sounds like so many of the allegations that went with Hillary Clinton, too.”

Cohost Lisa “Kennedy” Montgomery took the hint. She “asked” what the “most outrageous” part of the Cohen story is “because the exact same thing happened with Bill Clinton when he got that half a million dollar payday to speak [she made air quotes] to a Kremlin-backed Russian bank. How is that any different?”

Petkanas said the difference is there’s an investigation into whether there was “illegal coordination” between the Trump team and the Kremlin. As he again tried to explain why the Russian payment was suspicious, cohost Harris Faulkner interrupted.

“No, no, no, we get the facts,” she snapped. Because God forbid her viewers’ tender ears heard anything too damning of Dear Leader Trump. “What Kennedy is saying that when it happened on the other side of the political aisle with Bill Clinton”

Petkanas shot back, “I’m wondering why every time that you guys can’t defend Donald Trump, you bring in Hillary Clinton.”

Not surprisingly, the couch erupted with cries of innocence. When Petkanas didn’t buy it, Faulkner changed deflections. This time, she was oh, so concerned about the leaking of Cohen’s financial information to Michael Avenatti, Stormy Daniels attorney.

There’s no defending the leak. But it pales in comparison to a possible pay-to-play scheme involving the Russians and Donald Trump. If only Petkanas had hammered Fox a little harder for its deflections of a very important story. The squawking he engendered from the pushback he did make indicates these people can’t take the kind of questioning they dish out.

Enjoy watching the propagandists get put on defense below, from the May 10, 2018 Outnumbered. Underneath is Rachel Maddow’s terrific exploration of the dubious payments to Cohen, from the May 9, 2018 The Rachel Maddow Show.

 

 

Follow @newshounds

Follow @NewsHoundEllen


Do you like this post?
Tweet

Showing 4 reactions



    Review the site rules
Bemused commented 2018-05-12 13:24:14 -0400 · Flag
I’ve heard that Stormy Daniels’ attorney has asked Hannity for an invitation to appear on his programme. So far, Hannity hasn’t responded (I’ve heard).

I call chicken nuggets.
Bemused commented 2018-05-12 13:22:56 -0400 · Flag
Journalists would be seriously handicapped without leaks. And it’s important to remember that leakers are often motivated by disgust with whatever is being leaked: the Watergate story got out because a leaker simply couldn’t stand aside and accept what was being swept under that carpet. We would never have known anything about it without his leaks.

So far, most of the leaks considered legitimate by the silly foxies have turned out to be groundless, totally made up, bogus. I expect the same adverse outcome to occur with regard to leaks they consider bogus.
John McKee commented 2018-05-11 13:52:57 -0400 · Flag
There IS a defence of Avenatti’s release of the bank stuff. There is no way in the world this highly credentialled attorney would hobble his client’s case if it raised the possibility of important evidence being excluded. He may be using the media as part of his plan of action, taunting Trump and his Keystone Kops minions into behaving even more recklessly, but not to torpedo his own ship.

He must have received this information under the normal function of ‘discovery’ and there cannot have been any suppression order on that particular evidence. Absolutely guaranteed.
Eyes On Fox commented 2018-05-11 10:50:20 -0400 · Flag
The Trump administration, rather than draining the swamp, is turning out to be the most corrupt in American history. House Republicans are working feverishly to end the investigation and Trump himself keeps maneuvering to find a way to fire Mueller without risking impeachment.

It’s telling in this environment that Trump TV – which has asserted all along there’s nothing to see regarding Russia so let’s move along – is now running out of wallpaper to mask the corruption of the colorful cast of characters Trump surrounds himself with. So Fox diverts attention to Hillary fantasizing that the next investigation into her, unlike all which proceeded it, will find her guilty has hell. Just like #Benghazi!, eh, Fox?








or sign in with Facebook or email.
Follow @NewsHounds on Twitter
Subscribe with RSS


We’ve updated our Privacy Policy
Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Created with NationBuilder