NewsHounds
We watch Fox so you don't have to!
  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Forum
  • Blogroll
  • Donate
  • Shop
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
Home →

Todd Starnes Outrage #1,878,001: A Textbook That Cuts Palestinians Some Slack

Posted by Margarita -3pc on April 23, 2013 · Flag

True to form, culture warrior Todd Starnes has found another piece of left-wing school brainwashing to get upset about. This time it’s a high school textbook which, according to “a group of outraged parents”, is anti-Semitic and promotes bias against Israel. Specifically, the book asks students to consider “If a Palestinian suicide bomber kills several dozen Israeli teenagers in a Jerusalem restaurant, is that an act of terrorism or wartime retaliation against Israeli government policies and army actions?”

The book in question, “The Cultural Landscape: An Introduction to Human Geography,” is used in Advanced Placement classes in the Nashville area. “[It] is blatantly anti-Semitic,” said Laurie Cardoza-Moore, a parent and president of a “pro-Israel group.” (There’s a link embedded at this point in the article but it doesn’t link to anything.) Mark Freedman, executive director of the Jewish Federation of Nashville, said in a statement that the district needed to remove the book. “To create moral equivalency between specific acts of terror and legitimate territorial disputes that are political in nature serves to legitimize wanton and premeditated violence against innocent civilian victims.”  

The entire paragraph in question, provided by Director of Schools Mike Looney, reads: “Distinguishing terrorism from other acts of political violence can be difficult. For example, if a Palestinian suicide bomber kills several dozen Israeli teenagers in a Jerusalem restaurant, is that an act of terrorism or wartime, retaliation against Israeli government policies and army actions? Competing arguments are made: Israel’s sympathizers denounce the act as a terrorist threat to the country’s existence, whereas advocates of the Palestinian cause argue that long-standing injustices and Israeli army attacks on ordinary Palestinian civilians provoked the act.”

Is that “pro-Palestinian”, gentle reader? Fox Nation certainly thinks so, and some posters, predictably, are just as outraged as Starnes:

 newshounds3.png

But others are not.

newshounds2.png

I guess the last thing the Foxheads want is for students, even AP students, to learn how to consider alternate viewpoints. What would happen to Fox News' ratings then?

Follow @NewsHounds

Follow @NewsHoundEllen


Do you like this post?
Tweet

Showing 3 reactions



    Review the site rules
Bob Wilhelmi commented 2013-04-24 22:19:29 -0400 · Flag
The Palestinian question is controversial and it should be debated but The school encouraging debate about something that is really not debatable, That is not being neutral. Their being pro terrorism against Jerusalem. Read the example again. “Kills SEVERAL dozen teenagers (ie children) in a JERUSALEM restaurant.” If the sandy hook shooter had a anti government philosophy. and because the school is run by the Government. Could an argument be made that maybe he had a justification for what he did? Not in any reasonable fashion. and THAT example can’t be debated as being even the slightest bit reasonable. Thank you THx4 Fish for your comment i love a reasonable discussion!! Something i can’t get with my Fox loving Fam. Bob
Thx4 Fish commented 2013-04-24 12:58:34 -0400 · Flag
Bob Wilhelmi: Should books simply tell students what they should believe about controversial topics and avoid all discussion? These children will ultimately form their own opinions using their own sense of right and wrong and social influences. The neutrality of a book is unlikely to convince them of anything. How sad if schools should stop teaching kids to think about things just because they are controversial.
Bob Wilhelmi commented 2013-04-24 05:32:05 -0400 · Flag
How is distinguishing Terrorism difficult? I’m a Liberal but i’m going to have to join the other side on this one. (OMG) Asking whether someone blowing up innocent people is terrorism is like having a debate on the usefulness of the sun. If ANYONE says the Palestinians have a “CAUSE” to do this This then the Boston guy also had a “Cause” Too… I would be upset if my kids were taught that there was even a possibility that blowing up teenagers was just a act of political violence and NOT terrorism. (Bad taste in my mouth!!)








or sign in with Facebook or email.
Follow @NewsHounds on Twitter
Subscribe with RSS


We’ve updated our Privacy Policy
Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Created with NationBuilder