NewsHounds
We watch Fox so you don't have to!
  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Forum
  • Blogroll
  • Donate
  • Shop
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
Home →

O’Reilly Gloats Over Stephen Colbert’s Not-So-Great Late Show Ratings

Posted by Ellen -7859.80pc on December 11, 2015 · Flag

OReilly_Colbert.png

Bill O’Reilly is ready to declare Stephen Colbert a flop as host of The Late Show because he’s just too darned liberal. 

I’m sure the fact that Colbert made his name in late-night comedy lampooning O’Reilly had nothing to do with O’Reilly’s glee. In fact, O’Reilly never even mentioned it!

O’Reilly did pat himself on the back for his foresight. He played a clip from April, 2014 predicting that Colbert would be too liberal to do well.

O’REILLY: Colbert has made a living exclusively satirizing the right. And he has plenty of material. But that won’t be enough to beat Fallon and Kimmel who are sharp and well-produced. Colbert will have to be better than those guys to compete well in the ratings. And remember, he’s already alienated 40% of the country who define themselves as conservative.

Last night, O’Reilly suggested he had been proven correct.

O’REILLY: Now the ratings of the week of November 23rd show that Mr. Colbert has fallen behind Fallon, Kimmel and even Seth Meyers, who’s on the air an hour later than he is. Again, that’s because Colbert makes a living in the far-left precincts. When Letterman started doing that, his ratings started to fall. Fallon, Kimmel and Meyers – they’re not all that ideological. The late night audience simply wants a few laughs. They don’t want derisive political discourse.

Then O’Reilly took another victory lap, this time over his own ratings.

O’REILLY: By the way, in cable news, The Factor continues to dominate the ratings in all categories even though some publications dishonestly spin the numbers. Annoying, but after 19 years, we’re used to it. 

However, the story of Colbert’s ratings is not so simple, not so bad and not so settled. Variety explains there’s a “new math” in late night partly because of many changes in the programs but also in large part because of the rising role of social media.

In that light, the hosts need to build appeal with their core viewers, and then work to branch out. For instance, Colbert may not be the most-watched host in the wee hours, but his “Late Show” nabbed 52% more viewers between 18 and 49 in the first nine weeks of the television season, which exclude Colbert’s first two weeks, compared with the year-earlier period, and snared 118% more viewers between 18 and 34.

“The show can be very successful and very profitable without having to worry about Fallon and/or Kimmel,” said David Poltrack, CBS Corp.’s chief research officer. Colbert is luring a well-heeled, highly educated viewership, he said. “As long as he can hold on to that audience, he doesn’t have to win the numbers(game).” In other words, in a time slot splintered by new hosts, Colbert has to trump David Letterman, not Jimmy Fallon — at least for now. 

In other words, O’Reilly’s self-congratulations may well turn into, “Curses! Foiled again!”

Watch O’Reilly’s schadenfreude below, from the December 10 The O’Reilly Factor.

Follow @NewsHounds

Follow @NewsHoundEllen


Do you like this post?
Tweet

Showing 14 reactions



    Review the site rules
Brook Walker commented 2015-12-27 00:28:00 -0500 · Flag
Hang on, wait just one moment. So the math of failure is actually the arithmetic of Colbert’s success? So long as he has higher numbers than the guy he replaced (which he doesn’t) in a “newly defined demographic” (which doesn’t really exist) then Colbert’s kicking butt?! Twaddle. I liked Colbert as Colbert Report, but on Late Night he’s stilted, inauthentic and forced. A total moonbeam. And he is sycophantic to the guest he adores, all Dems (of course). I give it a year until “bye bye Colbert” and “hello Amy Schumer”
Angel Perez commented 2015-12-14 05:31:00 -0500 · Flag
Charmer?? Aren’t you a peach! I don’t copy other people’s post or save things I write I just say what’s on my mind. You all did erase my post because the message ( you must have sent) said I was being "inflammatory " or " too argumentative " , pretty weak CHARMER on your part… KEEP UP YOUR GAME, eventually your readers will catch on. Take care.
Ellen commented 2015-12-14 01:07:17 -0500 · Flag
Angel Perez,

The only comment deleted from you was one that I just deleted a few minutes ago because it was a duplicate of the one you posted about the ratings. Maybe you posted it here because it was mistakenly posted on another thread. If so, my mistake because it just looked like a duplicate and I didn’t look at the thread title.

So if you want to re-post that charmer here, you may.

Otherwise, the only comment that got erased by you on this thread was one you either inadvertently erased yourself or one that didn’t go through because our system is a bit dysfunctional.
Barbara S commented 2015-12-13 13:54:16 -0500 · Flag
Maybe you’re using up too much bandwidth.
Angel Perez commented 2015-12-13 12:59:10 -0500 · Flag
This site just edited me and erased a comment I wrote not allowing it to be sent.. lol funny. Even your rant sites are Bias. They don’t want their readers to hear another side. Funny.. Fox is 2 sides people. Wake up libs
Angel Perez commented 2015-12-13 12:47:21 -0500 · Flag
Actually Barbara, CNN or MSNBC is usually what theyes brainwash our elderly population With, people who care to hear an ACTUAL debate of an issue will watch FOX as they normally have 1 to 2 liberals on to be able of argue their point, I RARELY see that on MSNBGARBAGE. Or Maybe you watch George Snufalufagus? Ex Clinton spokesman pretending to be a news guy? Please. Tell me about stretching the truth!!! Liberals either don’t work or forgot “you can keep ur doctor if u like him, keep ur insurance if you like it, save 2500 per family” all of which he said countless times and then said "I did say you could, IF IT FALLS INTO OUR PLANS DESIGN " UMM. No that wasn’t said, but if u don’t wok you probably don’t know that, I pyramid a bit over 500 a month and it’s still rising, that’s a 60%increase since the magic Idiot forced this BS law on us. we’ll you tube it because all those news conference’s are there along with the one exception he denies saying it.. Dumb followers.. Now OBAMA part 3 wants in? You people gotta wake up eventually, right? HILLARY? She tells the world it’s a video in Bengazi for weeks and now she states “I never said that to the families of the 4 victims”really? You’re on video! We must be blind and deaf! Well you people might be but I’m not. Everything she touched as Secretary of state has gone to Crappy and she "takes responsibility " howwho was fired?? Did she apologize to the American people for the mess we are in? No, you people still blame Bush! #WAKEUPAMERICA Bush has been out of office for 7 years… plenty of time for “Hope and Change” Well I “HOPE” this POTUS GETS THE F..K out and Hillary “Changes” her depends under that pantsuit and sticks to trying to degrade the women her Husband Molested and Raped and fades away!
David Lindsay commented 2015-12-13 12:31:21 -0500 · Flag
The demographics are the icing on the cake. Advertisers are looking at the sweet spot. 18 to 35 year olds. The ones who might buy the sporty new car or sporty new smart phone.

But don’t worry Bill, you’ve got the Geritol and adult diaper market locked tight.
Barbara S commented 2015-12-13 11:53:55 -0500 · Flag
Angel- Yu’re right. Nursing homes are full of ‘informed’ O’Reilly fans.
d d commented 2015-12-13 10:10:29 -0500 · Flag
Not even a pimple of Bill’s butt? Is that you, BOR? Bwaaah! I’ll give you one thing – putting “informed” in quotes is spot on. LOL!

Thanks for the facts, Eyes On Fox. When it comes to BOR, it’s always good to check and see what he’s conveniently left out.
Barbara S commented 2015-12-11 17:54:01 -0500 · Flag
Nothing tickles me more than watching Billo trying to keep up with Stewart or Colbert – just priceless to watch this sneering DB think he’s on their comedy level.
Eyes On Fox commented 2015-12-11 10:28:30 -0500 · Flag
I can’t seem to be able to let this topic go. ;^)

Did some quick fact-checking. When dealing with anything uttered by Bill O’Reilly you know digging through his data-mined bullsh—t will have a payoff.

So Colbert who he mocks as being unpopular has an audience of 3.5 million. In ‘the demo’ he’s up 72%.

http://www.thewrap.com/stephen-colbert-late-show-cbs-tv-ratings-three-months/

Meanwhile, O’Reilly on his ‘best night ever’ last February (has he improved since?) is slightly trailing Colbert at 3.34 million. Ironically, this ‘surge’ was driven by the controversy over Bill’s serial lying which got a lot of mainstream media coverage. People love watching a train wreck!

http://variety.com/2015/tv/news/fox-news-channels-the-oreilly-factor-surges-in-ratings-1201442516/
truman commented 2015-12-11 09:46:06 -0500 · Flag
Bildo’s core audience, AKA The Bedpan Battalion, ranges in age from 65 to Dead.
Eyes On Fox commented 2015-12-11 09:41:02 -0500 · Flag
Colbert was brilliant parodying right-wing blowhards on Comedy Central. He’s okay as a late night host but he’s facing stiff competition.

That said, O’Reilly is doing his typical data-mining. Fox News continually pimps their Fox Business channel with great enthusiasm. You never see O’Reilly mock its pathetic ratings and its spin is clearly as right-wing as GOPTV™’s mothership Bill-O headlines.

Cue O’Reilly lying once or twice a day his is the ‘no-spin zone.’

Here’s a sampling of FBN’s abysmal ratings:

http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2015/10/09/cable-news-ratings-for-thursday-oct-8-2015/
Jan Hall commented 2015-12-11 09:19:29 -0500 · Flag
Colbert just can’t be as funny when he doesn’t have you to parody Junior. You’re still bragging that The O’Really Fact?or is at the top of the ratings? So you’ve done what “The Beverly Hillbillies” accomplished back in 1963? Thats what your proud of?








or sign in with Facebook or email.
Follow @NewsHounds on Twitter
Subscribe with RSS


We’ve updated our Privacy Policy
Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Created with NationBuilder