NewsHounds
We watch Fox so you don't have to!
  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Forum
  • Blogroll
  • Donate
  • Shop
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
Home →

O’Reilly Debates Koppel Re Fox News Bias

Posted by Ellen -7859.80pc on September 21, 2012 · Flag

Ted Koppel visited The O’Reilly Factor last night where he discussed the reasons he thinks opinionated cable news is not good for the country. Koppel gently but firmly confronted Bill O’Reilly on his own tactics that Koppel acknowledged were good for business but, he seemed to think, not much else. As the segment ended, O’Reilly said, “I still think I’m doing something noble.” And Koppel declined to respond.

The interview arose out of an editorial that Koppel wrote in the Washington Post in which he criticized cable news and, apparently, Bill O’Reilly, in particular. O’Reilly introduced the segment by saying, “The big mistake Mr. Koppel is making is putting me, your humble correspondent, in that category of speaking to the choir. I don’t. You know it. I had to convince Mr. Koppel of that.”

Let’s just say I don’t think Koppel was convinced. He said he didn’t have “a beef” with O’Reilly. But, Koppel added, he did find him “Sometimes a little too bold, sometimes a little too fresh, sometimes a little too intolerant of allowing people to complete an answer… It offends me when you’re rude, when you ride over people, as you have a tendency to do.”

O’Reilly said he only does it when someone “filibuster(s) or when they lie,” and doesn’t do it when somebody is “sincerely trying to answer my question.” Well, unless you’re Jeremy Glick. Or Jehmu Greene. And I’d love to see O’Reilly explain to Koppel his over-the-top attacks on abortion doctor George Tiller.

O’Reilly put forth the Fox News canard that most of Fox is unbiased reporting. “This is a news agency here,” he said, supposedly distinguishing it from MSNBC.

Koppel made it clear he wasn’t buying that. But rather than wade into the weeds, he said the overall partisanship on cable has “made it difficult, if not impossible, for decent men and women in Congress, on Capitol Hill, to reach across the aisle and find compromise. And if we can’t do that, Bill, we’re gonna be – and we have been, I think, for the last few years – in a terrible situation in this country where, politically, we can’t make deals any more.”

O’Reilly seemed more interested in defending himself and Fox than in considering its effects on American society. He said it’s “impossible” for a news network to be “on top” for so long if they have an "inferior product." He continued, “So therefore, I want you to re-evaluate our network, watch it a little bit more, and we’ll talk in about a year.”

Koppel did not indicate he’d agree to that. He ended by saying,“It’s a business and it’s operating as a business and once upon a time, you and I actually thought journalism was a calling.”

“But I still think that I’m doing something noble,” O’Reilly insisted.

Koppel didn’t say anything further.

Then they both laughed at that implication.

Follow @NewsHounds

Follow @NewsHoundEllen


Do you like this post?
Tweet

Showing 9 reactions



    Review the site rules
Bemused commented 2012-09-23 02:48:48 -0400 · Flag
After talking about this with friends who know both America and Europe well, I feel the need to add a bit to what I said about this “kiss”. There was nothing sexual about it as I (and my friends) see it: that sort of “kiss” is a scornful rejection over here, not an invitation to party. It’s a refusal between former colleagues, one of whom still sees “journalism as a calling”.

And it can get you killed in Mafia circles … not that I believe for a moment that Koppel is in any way connected with that lot … oh dear, it’s so hard to block foxy holes towards wilful mis-understanding.
Kevin Koster commented 2012-09-22 14:01:53 -0400 · Flag
This was an interesting exchange – in that Koppel was not backing down. He did allow that both Fox News and MSNBC pull in partisan directions, so he didn’t completely single Fox out, but he made his point quite effectively that O’Reilly’s behavior and the channel’s behavior has been counterproductive.

I would be very interested to see the Koppel interview of O’Reilly, in case anything else fell out there.

At the same time, there was one very interesting O’Reilly moment this week that I don’t think has gotten any coverage anywhere. On Wednesday night, he had Dick Morris on and seemed to be genuinely angry with him. Morris kept trying to bloviate his points about the GOP somehow being on the verge of convincingly winning the presidency and the Senate and O’Reilly kept cutting him off. The first time, he snapped “Wait a second, or I’ll kick your coverage.” The second time he flat out yelled at Morris, something like “Can it, Morris!” And at the end, he mentioned that Morris had disagreed with his Talking Points and gave him 30 seconds to say why. Now, all of this was done while O’Reilly was continuing to let Morris plug his book, but there was something else going on. I strongly doubt the animus was just from Morris disagreeing with him – but you never know with O’Reilly’s ego.

It’s becoming clearer and clearer that even the wags like Morris are unable to talk away the serious trouble in which the Romney campaign finds itself now. Both Morris and Priebus are now starting to admit that it doesn’t look rosy for their guy. Rove is now trying to use the card about the 1980 Carter/Reagan race – without noting that the current situation is quite different. In 1980, most people only knew of Reagan as an actor (not counting the Californians who knew him as a governor) and hadn’t really seen him up close until the debates. And Carter was a pretty stiff speaker while Reagan was more at ease. In the current situation, Obama is the better speaker, and the country has seen plenty of Romney in the umpteen debates and appearances over the past year. I have to wonder where they think this sudden massive surge for him is going to erupt from.
Bemused commented 2012-09-22 11:26:01 -0400 · Flag
@JayE: After reading your post, I went back to the video and there was the kiss: loud and clear.

Koppel was devastatingly ironic and all of it passed right over Bill’s head. I particularly liked the part where Koppel he said he’d have preferred criticism from Bill “because your compliments are more damaging”.

Koppel provided a little detail on FNC’s supposed popularity: FNC’s (supposedly) news programs are aired when most people are at work (9 to 5). It’s the evening programmes that get the millions and that’s when the RW bullshit becomes fast and furious.

For the foxies, “making deals” is a sign of weakness, like “apologising” for being in the wrong.

I looked up Mr. Koppel’s bio and found yet another example of a real journalist (one for whom “journalism is a calling”) at risk of accused of being leftist (Bill came very clear to saying that but was clearly afraid of the reaction). It’s not because they always were leftist or even that they evolved in that direction.
Rather, it’s because right-wingers are rushing headlong away from the centre. Journalists who continue to report the facts full stop only appear to be tilting left because that arm on the right is getting longer and longer (like Pinnochio’s nose).
Kent Brockman commented 2012-09-22 03:54:35 -0400 · Flag
“But I still think that I’m doing something noble,” POS borally insisted

hmmm…

From Part 3 of Adam Curtis’ “The Trap”

10 – clip of Kenneth Clark BBC “Civilization”
‘Oh freedom, Freedom, come to us again’
“They suffered from the most terrible of delusions. They believed themselves to be virtuous and in the end were destroyed by the evil beings they had brought into existence.”

Billdo should cash in before he has another peron murdered.
(((jazzidiot))) commented 2012-09-22 00:40:33 -0400 · Flag
Am I the only one who saw Koppel blow Billo a kiss as an answer to “I still think I’m doing something noble”?
He didn’t say what he was thinking – just the kiss.
LOL.
Bob Roberts commented 2012-09-21 18:32:50 -0400 · Flag
Koppel should have hit him harder. But he is too much of a gentleman, unlike O’Falafel, to do that.

Lying out of his teeth again. Nobody believes that Megyn Kelly, McCallum, Brier, Cameron, etc., are unbiased “journalists”. Just listen to them for a couple of minutes. Was O’Loofah smirking like Willard when he dropped that canard????
R L commented 2012-09-21 15:46:13 -0400 · Flag
methinks o’reilly is unaware of the meaning of the word noble.
doors17 commented 2012-09-21 15:30:45 -0400 · Flag
I always respected Ted Koppel as a journalist. I watched Nightline almost every night during the eighties, and never once could I tell whose side he was on, and never really gave it a thought. He just gave me the news, not his opinion. Nightline was to me the true definition of fair and balanced.

Noble, Bill? I don’t mean to sound cornball here, but that word belongs as a description to our soldiers, police, fire, and teachers who put the greater good of others over personal wealth. We need more Ted Koppel’s and less O’Reilly’s who only pretend in their minds that they’re seriously taken as a journalist.
truman commented 2012-09-21 14:52:37 -0400 · Flag
What is “noble” about a faux news channel whose 24/7 existence is devoted to vilifying our elected President? More accurately it’s “ignoble”—-i.e. characterized by baseness, lowness, or meanness. Bildo can stick that in his Funk & Wagnalls.








or sign in with Facebook or email.
Follow @NewsHounds on Twitter
Subscribe with RSS


We’ve updated our Privacy Policy
Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Created with NationBuilder