NewsHounds
We watch Fox so you don't have to!
  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Forum
  • Blogroll
  • Donate
  • Shop
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
Home →

Napolitano’s GCHQ Wiretapping Source Was A Former Fox Contributor Appearing On Russian Media

Posted by Ellen -7859.80pc on March 18, 2017 · Flag

Napolitano_1st_100_days.png

Former Fox News contributor and former intelligence officer Larry Johnson has confirmed that he was one of the sources for Fox pundit Andrew Napolitano’s sensational claim that British spies worked in cahoots with President Barack Obama to wiretap Donald Trump. UPDATED: Johnson has said Napolitano got his (mis)information from an online discussion board

As you probably know by now, Napolitano’s claim was cited by Press Secretary Sean Spicer in an effort to bolster Trump’s credibility for his unsubstantiated, widely disputed claim that he was wiretapped by Obama. Unfortunately for the White House, the effort backfired badly and caused an international incident yesterday.

But before that happened, Media Matters traced Napolitano’s claim to an interview by Larry C. Johnson on Russia’s RT network.

Appearing on a March 6 broadcast on state-sponsored Russian news network RT, Larry C. Johnson, credited as a “former CIA analyst and State Department official,” alleged that “there was some collusion overseas” between U.S. intelligence and “Britain’s own GHCQ (sic)” “to derail the candidacy of Donald Trump.” Citing “very good friends,” Johnson alleged that GCHQ “actually passed” information “to John Brennan, and it was disseminated within the U.S. government.” Johnson closed the RT interview by claiming former Obama administration officials involved in the collusion could face "criminal charges," specifically sedition. 

Media Matters noted that the Johnson interview was shared “by hyperpartisan and conspiracy theorist sites” and that the conspiracy theory spread to Breitbart and Reddit after Napolitano promoted it on Fox.

Now Johnson has confirmed to The New York Times that he was one of Napolitano’s sources, though Johnson claimed that while his information came from American intelligence community sources, Napolitano got his “through an intermediary,” as The Times put it.

Regardless, Napolitano had plenty of reason to question Johnson’s credibility. From Media Matters: 

[Johnson] has accused John Kerry of war crimes, spread the 2008 rumor about a supposed recording of former first lady Michelle Obama “railing against ‘whitey,’” and now is floating "sedition" charges against former Obama officials.

It speaks volumes about Napolitano that he apparently did not question the reliability of Johnson's claim.

Watch Spicer cite Napolitano during the March 16, 2017 White House briefing below, via The New York Times.

Image of Napolitano via screen grab.

3/20/17 update, from The Hill:

“I'm not saying the British GHCQ was wiretapping Trump's Tower. … [Napolitano] shouldn't have used the word wiretap. I call it an ‘information operation’ that's been directed against President Trump and people like John Brennan,” Johnson said.

[...} 

Johnson said Napolitano used Johnson’s anonymous sources to support his claims.

Follow @NewsHounds

Follow @NewsHoundEllen


Do you like this post?
Tweet

Showing 10 reactions



    Review the site rules
Thx4 Fish commented 2017-03-20 11:50:45 -0400 · Flag
I used to think that many Republicans understood that information heard on Fox News is for propaganda and entertainment purposes only. And that the smart ones knew better than to take Fox News literally. I guess there are fewer ‘smart ones’ than I thought. SAD
Ellen commented 2017-03-20 01:44:31 -0400 · Flag
Oops, I had “officer,” which still seems to be correct.
http://thehill.com/homenews/324707-ex-intelligence-official-napolitanos-british-wire-tapping-claim-didnt-get-it-right
Ellen commented 2017-03-20 01:40:27 -0400 · Flag
ez, you are correct. I did see him referred to as both in various news articles I read for this post. But I am going to change it to “analyst.”
Ellen commented 2017-03-20 01:39:42 -0400 · Flag
Eyes on Fox,

LOL!
Eyes On Fox commented 2017-03-19 19:06:57 -0400 · Flag
Why doesn’t the GOP bypass the middleman and just nominate Putin for president in 2020? That gives them a couple of years to amend the Constitution. 😉
Arthur Gane commented 2017-03-19 15:09:24 -0400 · Flag
Just what is the definition of treason in relation to White House staff and aides?
Can a President actually commit treason or even leak classified information because once he says it doesn’t that mean it is instantly declassified?
Just asking of course.
David Lindsay commented 2017-03-19 10:14:52 -0400 · Flag
Analyst doesn’t rhyme with kook.

:D
john howard commented 2017-03-19 08:04:01 -0400 · Flag
Keep shinning the light on the lies and the truth will reveal itself. So keep the light shinning.
Bemused commented 2017-03-19 07:31:10 -0400 · Flag
LOL David.
David Lindsay commented 2017-03-18 20:38:42 -0400 · Flag
A President quoting a judge quoting a CIA agent. A puke quoting a kook quoting a spook.








or sign in with Facebook or email.
Follow @NewsHounds on Twitter
Subscribe with RSS


We’ve updated our Privacy Policy
Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Created with NationBuilder