NewsHounds
We watch Fox so you don't have to!
  • Home
  • About
  • Forum
  • Archives
  • Blogroll
  • Donate
  • Shop
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
Home →

Judiciary Committee Impeachment Hearing – Open Thread And Live Stream

Posted by Ellen -7835.60pc on December 04, 2019 · Flag

The House Judiciary Committee will hold its first impeachment hearing Wednesday, at 10 AM ET. The witnesses will be four constitutional scholars. Given the makeup of the Committee, there are sure to be fireworks.

Vox explains who will testify:

The Judiciary Committee is expected to hear from four witnesses: Noah Feldman of Harvard University, Pamela Karlan of Stanford University, Michael Gerhardt of the University of North Carolina, and Jonathan Turley of George Washington University. All four are constitutional scholars; three were selected by Democrats, and one by Republicans, who have complained that more witnesses should be added and that the minority should be allowed to bring in more experts.

The Los Angeles Times notes that the Judiciary Committee “is far larger than the Intelligence Committee and includes some of the most partisan Republicans and Democrats in Congress.” That could produce “a level of bombast the public hasn’t seen so far.” Think Corey Lewandowski hearing.

Still, it will be history in the making so I will be watching and commenting below. Share your thoughts and observations, too.

You can also watch it live streaming below, via PBS NewsHour.

(Trump caricature by DonkeyHotey via Creative Commons license)

Follow @NewsHounds

Follow @NewsHoundEllen


Do you like this post?
Tweet

Showing 23 reactions



    Review the site rules
Bemused commented 2019-12-07 05:55:09 -0500 · Flag
My friend (a life-long Republican who intends to vote Democrat in future) simply tuned out the circus performers. He openly admits to give preference to the other Republicans whose behaviour is less embarrassing. He admits to being at the “grasping at straws” stage.
Kevin Koster commented 2019-12-05 12:01:35 -0500 · Flag
I find it interesting that Turley advocated the other way when it came to the Bill Clinton impeachment. He testified in front of Congress a little more than 20 years ago, and reiterated his position in 2014, saying that a president could be impeached and removed for their behavior even if they didn’t break the law. Now he’s trying to play a game about making this about something completely different.

I also find it interesting that several of the Republicans were unable to maintain their composure – particularly Matt Gaetz, who humiliated himself with an extremely strange emotional outburst where he began to rant in a singsong voice and shout at the panel for some reason.

I noted that the Dems were trying to simply deal with the legality of the discussion, and to confirm that this course of action is in fact the correct one by the Constitution. The Republicans on the other hand were repeatedly trying to interject confusion and snarky comments, even to the point of interrupting Nadler’s closing statement with even more nonsense.

The question now is how quickly McConnell will move to dismiss the whole thing in the Senate. It’s more likely that he will avoid the big trial situation by simply calling a voice vote and ending the matter as fast as he can. If he lets it get to a trial on the floor, he potentially loses control of its momentum and Grassley won’t be able to gavel the witnesses into silence before they’ve made a mess of things for him.
Bemused commented 2019-12-05 10:25:22 -0500 · Flag
Managed to watch the opening statements and testimonials but switched off the TV when I expected the circus to start. While I’m a bit disappointed not to have been able to see some Republicans behave like adults (reportedly), that’s definitely a positive. This is a video that all students in the country should see, both to understand the Constitution and to see how they should behave as adults.

Three of the four professors focused on substance. They presented the Constitution in everyday language, with an emphasis on why the Framers chose certain words and not others. Having done that, they gave their expert opinion on the substance of the impeachment issue. Their focus was on substance and their expert opinion (verdict) could not have been more damning.

By contrast, the fourth one complained about the speed at which the House is moving!

Uh, OK. Using that logic, a thief caught with a stolen wallet (redhanded) would expect to undergo the same indepth investigation that would have to be conducted had that thief been apprehended after having spent the money. Depressing to realise that this guy is actually teaching law to the legal profession of the future.
Eyes On Fox commented 2019-12-05 01:05:29 -0500 · Flag
You’ll never get through to the MAGA crowd. I decided to check out Fox News’ web coverage on their homepage. There was no serious news article discussing overall the hearing. Then, forgetting a slew of impeachment smearing pundit links (there’s a couple of ‘news’ impeachment surgical attacks like “Doug Collins spars with Jerry Nadler after Louie Gohmert tries to speak”) on the sidebars, here’s the 3 featured stories I found:

“MELANIA HITS BACK: First lady fights back against legal scholar who used Barron Trump’s name for laughs at hearing”
“GAETZ GRILLING: Republican rips impeachment witnesses over donations to prominent Dems”
“STATE OF ACADEMIA ON DISPLAY: 3 professors picked by Dems at hearing are ‘radical activists,’ Levin says”

TrumpTV™ has become an alternate reality universe to such the degree even I can’t believe it. I’m totally serious.
John McKee commented 2019-12-05 00:40:28 -0500 · Flag
I missed that bit too, Ellen, but all it involved was Prof Karlin making a bit of a joke, wondering whether Trump calling his son Barron indicated that he fancied himself as a baron. A little weak, but we can’t all be Steven Colbert.

What has always fascinated me about that name was it it had been the surname of one of his make-believe spokesmen, John Barron. I think he used as some sort of compliment to his own rapier-sharp wit and ingenuity. Who knows what weird shit bubbles and churns around in that obese old head…
Ellen commented 2019-12-05 00:25:51 -0500 · Flag
I missed the closing as I had Zumba class at 6:30 and did not want to miss it again (the last Wednesday hearing went until after 8, as I recall).

But I caught a glimpse of CNN at the gym and they had as part of their “breaking news” coverage, a banner stating that one of the witnesses (Karlan) had apologized for invoking Barron Trump. I tweeted to CNN that this is why I almost never watch that network.
John McKee commented 2019-12-04 20:08:02 -0500 · Flag
Will any no-extradition country in Europe or elsewhere give Rudy asylum? Will he ever set foot on American soil again?
John McKee commented 2019-12-04 18:44:14 -0500 · Flag
How wonderful of Rudy to put an exclamation mark on the day by whipping off to Ukraine again. You are our greatest asset, Giuliani!
John McKee commented 2019-12-04 17:53:30 -0500 · Flag
Yay, Mr Neguse. I wish everyone was taking a blowtorch to the complicit expert. He needs to be forced to say “Yes, this was OK. That was OK. Yes, that behaviour was acceptable” or back away.
truman commented 2019-12-04 17:40:18 -0500 · Flag
Turley’s testimony is his audition to replace Judge Napolitano as the Fux News senior legal analyst.
John McKee commented 2019-12-04 17:34:20 -0500 · Flag
The contrast between the sides is so striking – only someone determined to block their ears and their minds could fail to recognise that. The dissenting law professor has besmirched his reputation forever with this display. I can forgive him for whatever he said while representing that impeached judge, but not this. His job is to expound on the law and the constitution, NOT act as the defence attorney for Trump.
Ellen commented 2019-12-04 16:18:28 -0500 · Flag
Also, it seems the GOP gave up on its disruptive theatrics. They must have realized how childish they looked next to the serious, sober Democrats.
Ellen commented 2019-12-04 16:17:45 -0500 · Flag
I don’t know what happened to my last comment but I wrote that I think this hearing is more effective for Democrats than the Intel Committee hearings.

I also said that I am not throwing shade on Adam Schiff or the rest of the Intel Committee because I thought they did a terrific job. But the facts and testimonies were complicated and even I had trouble following some of it.

By contrast, these legal experts are very clear, concise and damning of Trump’s behavior.
Ellen commented 2019-12-04 12:14:58 -0500 · Flag
On Fox, Andy McCarthy called the hearing so far “very effective” for Democrats.
John McKee commented 2019-12-04 11:47:57 -0500 · Flag
Can’t put my finger on who, but Prof Feldman’s haircut makes him look like sone comic character. Oh well, at least he’s not sporting a bow tie :)
John McKee commented 2019-12-04 11:33:31 -0500 · Flag
Come on Norm, concentrate on the apologist. Make him squirm. Patsy questions to the other three are not going to change minds.
John McKee commented 2019-12-04 11:26:28 -0500 · Flag
Can you believe the arrogance of those Republicans who don’t even bother to speak into the microphone so the clerk can hear them? Complete contrast to the Democrat members.
Ellen commented 2019-12-04 11:25:26 -0500 · Flag
I’m not a Republican (obviously) but I really wonder if all their interruptions and frivolous motions are not getting annoying to the base.
John McKee commented 2019-12-04 11:22:12 -0500 · Flag
A Man for all Seasons?? Jesus H…
John McKee commented 2019-12-04 11:19:54 -0500 · Flag
Haven’t made a dent yet, Jonathan…
John McKee commented 2019-12-04 11:13:00 -0500 · Flag
All three have been very impressive. I’m really looking forward to finding out how on earth the Republicans’ professor can give any aid and comfort to Trump and cronies.
Ellen commented 2019-12-04 11:02:23 -0500 · Flag
Professor Pamela Karlan has #Pzazz
John McKee commented 2019-12-04 10:55:48 -0500 · Flag
Pretty impressive that the ranking member can bluster so blather for ten full minutes without saying a single bloody thing.








or sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Follow @NewsHounds on Twitter
Subscribe with RSS


We’ve updated our Privacy Policy
×
Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Created with NationBuilder