NewsHounds
We watch Fox so you don't have to!
  • Home
  • About
  • Forum
  • Archives
  • Blogroll
  • Donate
  • Shop
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
Home →

Fox News Loves Clint Eastwood!

Posted by Brian and Ellen -18pc on September 01, 2012 · Flag

AP reported yesterday that Twitter was “instantly ablaze” with comments mocking Clint Eastwood’s bizarre presentation to the Republican convention that included an imaginary conversation with “President Obama” in an empty chair. The wire service said that a Twitter account called @InvisibleObama had 30,000 followers half a day later. But on Fox News, the pundits fell all over themselves praising Eastwood and, of course, attacking the left for good measure while they were at it. My vote for comment of the day goes to Laura Ingraham who called Eastwood “Don Rickles in American politics.”

AP also noted, “Backstage, stern-faced Romney aides winced at times as Eastwood’s remarks stretched on.”

CBS News reported,

As traffic on Twitter about the actor’s bizarre speech spiked, the Romney campaign rushed out a statement even as their candidate was delivering his acceptance speech.

“Judging an American icon like Clint Eastwood through a typical political lens doesn’t work,” the statement said. “His ad-libbing was a break from all the political speeches, and the crowd enjoyed it.”

Coincidentally, those same sentiments were echoed repeatedly on Fox the next day.

Of the shows we saw, going chronologically, let's start with Fox News contributor Janine Turner on America Live. She called Eastwood’s performance “fantastic!” and “very, very important.” She added, “He’s an actor! He’s gonna say things and do things a little bit quirky and different. But what he said is that we own our country and that politicians are our employees. That’s, that’s brilliant! It needed to be said.”

Guest host Alisyn Camerota initially questioned whether Eastwood had been “appropriate for the moment.” But later, she noted his age of 82 and then prompted asked, “Does he deserve a bit of a pass if his delivery was sometimes uncomfortable or awkward?”

Predictably, Turner thought so. “We should be applauding this. The liberals? They’re going to be ugly because they’re scared! Because Clint Eastwood walked on that stage and endorsed Mitt Romney!”

Next up: Mike Huckabee on Your World.

After playing a clip of MSNBC pundits panning Eastwood, host Neil Cavuto said, “Maybe we were at different conventions. This was a silly thing, it wasn’t meant to be this great cerebral moment.”

Huckabee called Eastwood “a great American” who “loves this country.” Nevertheless, even he seemed to struggle for words to describe the bizarre performance. “I thought it was, you know…” His voice trailed off. Then he added, “It was Clint Eastwood, for God’s sake.”

Cavuto argued that Eastwood’s teleprompter had “gone down” and he was forced to “wing it.” For the record, CBS News reported:

One Republican official told CBS News political director John Dickerson said Eastwood was not scripted because they didn’t want to “rein in his creativity.” But when asked after the speech, a senior Romney adviser rolled his eyes, and acknowledged “it was a distraction.” One they couldn’t turn off.

Finally, on The O’Reilly Factor, Geraldo Rivera had a vastly different take. He didn’t mince words as he called Eastwood’s speech “buffoonery” and said that it detracted from Romney’s “terrific… strong and humane” speech.

But before he got a chance to say a word, guest host Laura Ingraham preempted his criticisms with a positive spin: “I loved Clint Eastwood from beginning to end. Because it had everyone on edge. It was an unscripted moment in a buttoned-up convention… and it drove the left absolutely bonkers… I loved every minute of it.”

Rivera retorted, “If you’re going to do stand up comedy, you have to have good writing… I thought it was dreadful.”

Ingraham said Eastwood is a jazz pianist “so he’s up there improvising.” She called him a “warm up” for Marco Rubio. Then she added, “This is Don Rickles in American politics.”

The only problem, Foxies? America doesn’t see it the way you do.

Follow @NewsHounds

Follow @NewsHoundEllen


Do you like this post?
Tweet

Showing 14 reactions



    Review the site rules
Ellen commented 2012-09-04 02:04:21 -0400 · Flag
Bemused,

I’ve always seen Sabato presented as a political science professor and he comments on politics, polling, etc. I’ve never seen him on Fox talking about Italy. After all, America is so exceptional, they never have time to talk about any other country… except Mexico and Iran.
Bemused commented 2012-09-03 05:29:27 -0400 · Flag
@Ellen
I see him as the foxies’ their go-to guy for a supposedly outsider’s opinion and he’s often called on to talk about the USA over here. He seems to have a dual role as an authority on Italy over there (perhaps because of his name) and on the USA over here. We have far better commentators on Italy, mostly because they actually live here and get their information from all possible sources. Sabato clearly got his from the establishment during the previous administration.
Anyway, I was surprised to read that Sabato had dissed the performances both of Eastwood and Romney, even though he then brushed both cases aside as irrelevant. He’s also not on the same page as Fox with regard to the % of people still undecided. IMO, yet more traces of rebellion in the ranks as the fox faithful increasingly realise how unfair and unbalanced (aka loony) their favourite channel can and has always been.
Bemused aka Pollyanna (=ever hopeful)
Ellen commented 2012-09-03 02:27:25 -0400 · Flag
Bemused, I’ve seen Larry Sabato on Fox pretty often lately. I can’t recall anything in particular he’s said but I know I’ve seen him!
Bemused commented 2012-09-03 02:04:30 -0400 · Flag
Ooooh, Very nicely put, Patrick.
Can’t find the “like” button anywhere.
Bemused commented 2012-09-02 03:19:42 -0400 · Flag
Has anybody seen Prof. Larry Sabato (U. of Virginia) lately? Although a staunch fan of most wingnut positions, he was less than enthusiastic about Clint’s performance in an interview with Arthur Zampiglione in this morning’s La Repubblica. He also dissed the humanizing impact of Romney’s speech, but brushed both effects aside as being insignificant. According to Prof. Sabato, only 5% of the electorate is still undecided whereas the foxies have it at almost 25%.

Will Prof. Sabato be less than welcome on Fox in the near future? Stay with us to find out (though we won’t even try to speculate on the fear-inducing effect that might have on your life).
mj - the same one commented 2012-09-01 15:02:41 -0400 · Flag
Oh, and I can’t WAIT to hear Sean Hannity’s reaction.

I recall Sean had a temper tantrum after Eastwood’s “Halftime in America” Super Bowl ad; he and other wingnut noisemakers thought the lifelong Republican committed an act of betrayal by supporting the President — to the point where Eastwood had to issue a public denial afterwards.

What ya wanna bet Hannity will find Clint Eastwood talking to an empty chair for more than 5 minutes over his allotted time “a display of thespian brilliance”?

.
Antoinette commented 2012-09-01 14:48:35 -0400 · Flag
Well..anyone notice the timing of Eastwood’s appearance at the GOP and the release of his new film, “Trouble With The Curve”? The masses have seen the world’s biggest publicity stunt for the film.
mj - the same one commented 2012-09-01 14:11:33 -0400 · Flag
Political/Editorial cartoonists are having a field day:

http://thepoliticalcarnival.net/2012/09/01/cartoons-of-the-day-clint-misfires/#disqus_thread

.
Anne-claire Souza commented 2012-09-01 12:02:50 -0400 · Flag
The desperate Repulsecans finally brought in their best shot, a Spagetti Western actor who could never act and proved that he can’t speak either.What an embarrassment this performance.
mj - the same one commented 2012-09-01 10:00:44 -0400 · Flag
The PERFECT response was President Obama tweeting a pic of himself at a meeting, with the caption, “This Seat’s Taken”:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/08/31/1126277/—This-Seat-s-Taken-Tweets-President-Obama-to-Clint-Eastwood-s-Bizarre-and-Disrepectful-Speech

Guess what, repubs — not only is that seat taken, it’s reserved another four years . . .

.
doors17 commented 2012-09-01 09:58:25 -0400 · Flag
Right turn Clyde.
truman commented 2012-09-01 09:24:45 -0400 · Flag
Without a well-written script and rehearsals, Eastwood became just a doddering, rambling old fool. He was incoherent and feeble-minded.

If Screech Owl Ingraham thinks that Eastwood was funny, she would laugh her skanky ass off at a Alzheimers treatment home.
Rick Patel commented 2012-09-01 06:23:49 -0400 · Flag
Had Obama been on-stage Eastwood could have spoken to an empty suit. His RNC act was much better than “Bridges of Madison County” with wan, waspish M. Streep.
Bemused commented 2012-09-01 03:08:39 -0400 · Flag
The version over here is that Clint Eastwood had no success with film-makers in the USA so he came to Italy and became a star in spaghetti westerns shot in Spain or Morocco. He was so completely in keeping with the comic book characters! I’ve always liked the tongue-in-cheek tone of those westerns but Eastwood never cottoned on that he was an intelligent parody of Tom Mix-ing-cement (aka Tex Willer) and Spillane (sp?)
As it turned out he was a better actor than the Americans had thought, and the benefits of participating in genuinely witty films have clearly worn off as the years passed. He was rather more vulgar than witty, but older folks in the audience clearly appreciated the vulgarity. Pitiful and hence not worthy of further note. Paraphrasing an old saying: “Let doddering old farts lie”.








or sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Follow @NewsHounds on Twitter
Subscribe with RSS


We’ve updated our Privacy Policy
×
Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Created with NationBuilder