Agent 86 commented on Sarah Palin Back On Fox And Writing A Book About The War On Christmas
2013-06-17 16:49:38 -0400
· Flag
ROFLMFAO…Snow Snooki questioning someone else’s intelligence….oh man…gotta catch my breath and wipe the tears from my eyes.
Agent 86 commented on Fox News Outrageous Quote Of The Week Poll – 6/2/13-6/8/13
2013-06-09 23:10:49 -0400
· Flag
Man it was tough between Ablow and West but I had to give the nod to Ablow. This man is a disgrace to the mental health profession peddling the crap he does.
Agent 86 commented on Fox Guest: We Need More Greenhouse Gases!
2013-05-28 18:38:49 -0400
· Flag
This one wins the Outrageous Comment of the Week award hands down.
Agent 86 commented on Jon Stewart Turns Fox’s Benghazi Scandal Into The Laughing Stock It Deserves To Be
2013-05-09 13:23:44 -0400
· Flag
So let me get this stratight….the right claims this Administration is supposed to be ignorant and incompetent yet, the GOP hitsquad can’t unearth the Benghazi cover-up conspiracy after two attempts. What does that say about them? Nevermind…I answered my own question.
Agent 86 commented on Bolling And Beckel Challenge Jon Stewart To Debate On The Five
2013-04-28 21:00:01 -0400
· Flag
Bolling would be fileted. This is assuming Stewart could get a word in edgewise while being yelled over. Bolling takes his methods from Hannity.
Agent 86 commented on Jon Stewart Skewers Fox News Eager Shredding Of The Constitution In Wake Of Boston Bombings
2013-04-25 16:42:22 -0400
· Flag
This was another Stewart/TDS masterpiece.
Agent 86 commented on Fox and Friends Guests Hysterically Claim Obama is Out to Silence Them
2013-01-29 14:53:56 -0500
· Flag
U, I didn’t dismiss the Pew study.., that’s YOUR bias showing. I simply pointed out that an 8 week study during an election cycle is not indicative of an overall level of network bias as was the apparent contention of the OPINION piece in the Sun which cherry picked the parts of a Pew STUDY to fit the narrative. Re-read the highlighted part in my last post again where I further pointed out that even the Pew article itself put some context around the data which was ignored in the Sun piece by the…pardon me….“obviously Conservatively biased author”. Pew did call out MSNBC for the numbers during the 8 week study period that is true. I would like to see them do one now that the election is over and sample the same data. If that data bears out the contention of the Sun OPINION piece blanket statement that MSNBC is more biased than FOX I would concede the argument. As someone else pointed out, assuming Romney made a greater number of fallacious statement, those would be targeted by MSNBC (negative story) and ignored by Fox at best or spun in a positive light (zero or +1 positive). Anyway, get back to me when you get that new Pew STUDY so we can revisit the discussion.
I didn’t use code words for anything, a hack is a hack left or right, again that’s YOUR bias is showing being nit-picky as a diversion. When the Sun article author resorts to subtle name calling such as saying someone should change their title to Minister of Information and basically giving Fox a pass, yeah…that’s my clue he’s biased. Do you teach how to tell partisan opinion from unbiased fact, context, and the concept that correlation does not imply causation or to you simply tell the kids “Conservative good, Liberal bad” or whatever?
Also, I didn’t say a word about MSNBC not stumping for Democrats/Liberals. They do…so what? Fox stumps for the GOP yet claims fair and balanced which you and I both know is BS and you my friend are blind if you don’t see that. Any “Liberal” they have on any of their shows is outnumbered by orders of magnitude, talked over, shouted over and very seldom gets a word in edgewise. I know you’ll disagree.
Anyway, I look forward to your posting of the link to the new Pew study on media bias.
I didn’t use code words for anything, a hack is a hack left or right, again that’s YOUR bias is showing being nit-picky as a diversion. When the Sun article author resorts to subtle name calling such as saying someone should change their title to Minister of Information and basically giving Fox a pass, yeah…that’s my clue he’s biased. Do you teach how to tell partisan opinion from unbiased fact, context, and the concept that correlation does not imply causation or to you simply tell the kids “Conservative good, Liberal bad” or whatever?
Also, I didn’t say a word about MSNBC not stumping for Democrats/Liberals. They do…so what? Fox stumps for the GOP yet claims fair and balanced which you and I both know is BS and you my friend are blind if you don’t see that. Any “Liberal” they have on any of their shows is outnumbered by orders of magnitude, talked over, shouted over and very seldom gets a word in edgewise. I know you’ll disagree.
Anyway, I look forward to your posting of the link to the new Pew study on media bias.
Agent 86 commented on Got Hypocrisy? Bill O'Reilly Attacks Julianne Moore For "Cheap Shot" At Sarah Palin!
2013-01-16 09:48:22 -0500
· Flag
Vistor 55 — you forgot “Snow Snooki” also.
Agent 86 commented on Fox News: Trillion Dollar Coin Will Weigh 17,774 Tons
2013-01-15 11:33:51 -0500
· Flag
Sorry, 17,774 tons, not 17M tons. No matter, it’s still ludicrous.
Agent 86 commented on Krauthammer Wrongly Says Assault Weapons Ban 'Didn't Work'
2013-01-14 23:47:26 -0500
· Flag
@chris – I’m surmising your comment was pointed at me since you didn’t specify. First I never said what you needed, I was attempting to make a general statement about a valid use for 30+ round magazines by the general public. So I used the word “need”….sue me. Notice I didn’t say “assault rifle”, AR, AK, or any other scary looking firearm.
I also don’t know what gave you a belief that I’m a liberal elite – inferred by your statement and assumed it was pointed at me since your post followed mine and you didn’t specify. If it’s because I frequent this site and detest Fox News, you are mistaken. I’m neither Liberal nor elite. That’s one of the problems I really have with people who take rabid stance on any side of a debate is that they try to cast you into either the “for us or against us” camp and with today’s Fox News brand of Conservatives there is no such thing as compromising. Not saying you are one of those Fox News people but if the shoe fits. I agreed that a ban does little to stem the tide of this sort of bullshit and creates a slippery slope however since I didn’t agree that 30+ round magazines are the greatest thing and everyone should have them then I’m automatically cast in the “against us” camp. I guess the point of agreement was totally lost to you.
Another tactic commonly employed in these sorts of debates is false equivalency which you trotted out like clockwork.
However to humor you, and use your analogies:
They could ban cigarettes and it wouldn’t bother me however that’s not the point. In general, cigarettes are basically becoming banned – you pretty much cannot smoke in any restaurants, most bars, and within 25-50 feet of a public doorway (depending on the municipality) in my area. However, people typically don’t go batshit and run into a no-smoking area with a “high capacity” handful of lit cigarettes and begin burning people.
People killed in car accidents linked to speeding are not intentionally out to kill people, although by some twisted logic I guess you could make that case if it fits your narrative. Also with rare exception, you don’t get some asshole going nuts and running through a parking lot in a “high capacity” Hummer or Excursion trying to waste as many people as possible.
I would go on with the “assault” sugar and “tactical” coffee analogies but it would just get ridiculous, much like these false equivalency arguments.
I also don’t know what gave you a belief that I’m a liberal elite – inferred by your statement and assumed it was pointed at me since your post followed mine and you didn’t specify. If it’s because I frequent this site and detest Fox News, you are mistaken. I’m neither Liberal nor elite. That’s one of the problems I really have with people who take rabid stance on any side of a debate is that they try to cast you into either the “for us or against us” camp and with today’s Fox News brand of Conservatives there is no such thing as compromising. Not saying you are one of those Fox News people but if the shoe fits. I agreed that a ban does little to stem the tide of this sort of bullshit and creates a slippery slope however since I didn’t agree that 30+ round magazines are the greatest thing and everyone should have them then I’m automatically cast in the “against us” camp. I guess the point of agreement was totally lost to you.
Another tactic commonly employed in these sorts of debates is false equivalency which you trotted out like clockwork.
However to humor you, and use your analogies:
They could ban cigarettes and it wouldn’t bother me however that’s not the point. In general, cigarettes are basically becoming banned – you pretty much cannot smoke in any restaurants, most bars, and within 25-50 feet of a public doorway (depending on the municipality) in my area. However, people typically don’t go batshit and run into a no-smoking area with a “high capacity” handful of lit cigarettes and begin burning people.
People killed in car accidents linked to speeding are not intentionally out to kill people, although by some twisted logic I guess you could make that case if it fits your narrative. Also with rare exception, you don’t get some asshole going nuts and running through a parking lot in a “high capacity” Hummer or Excursion trying to waste as many people as possible.
I would go on with the “assault” sugar and “tactical” coffee analogies but it would just get ridiculous, much like these false equivalency arguments.
Agent 86 commented on Stewart Exposes Fox News Hypocrisy Over Attacks On Al Gore
2013-01-12 22:41:30 -0500
· Flag
@kevin – Yeah I know but it’s fun. Sort of like poking an ant bed with a stick then burning them with a magnifying glass. It’s mildly amusing pulling their strings and watching them rant like a FuxNuze Chatty Cathy.
Agent 86 commented on Fox Gives A Warm Welcome To Texas Secessionist
2013-01-08 16:49:27 -0500
· Flag
@mj — "If Texas secedes from the US, I give it no more than 72 hours before it becomes Mexico’s property — again. "
Based on the latest demographics we’re pretty much there or damned close to it.
Based on the latest demographics we’re pretty much there or damned close to it.
Agent 86 commented on Van Susteren Sends Stalker Producer To Gun Map Publisher's Home
2013-01-08 12:21:34 -0500
· Flag
Both publishing the addresses of the gun owners and in retribution the addresses of the paper staff are both reprehensible IMO. It’s sensationalism for $$ and it’s disgusting.
Agent 86 commented on Stuart Varney Cries Over Higher Taxes For The Rich
2013-01-08 10:58:30 -0500
· Flag
Maybe they can be declared enemy combatants and sent to Guantanamo to partake of the cock-meat sandwich. That isn’t your grandma’s chicken salad either.
Agent 86 commented on Jesse Watters Ogles Bikini Clad Women While Trashing President Obama As A Lazy, Black Man Who Once Did Drugs
2013-01-02 18:42:18 -0500
· Flag
I love the standard Fox video editing to fit their mantra. Like clockwork.
I think Jesse was smitten with the guy who said they had a vibe going. Just sayin…..
I think Jesse was smitten with the guy who said they had a vibe going. Just sayin…..
Agent 86 commented on GOP Civil War: Peter King Blasts Boehner For Blocking Sandy Relief
2013-01-02 15:47:18 -0500
· Flag
Watching today’s GOP is like watching cannibals eat their young.
Agent 86 commented on Breaking News: Congress Halts The Fiscal Cliff
2013-01-02 13:47:41 -0500
· Flag
@ Richard
“Missed it by THAT much” – on the Fiscal Cliff.
“Missed it by THAT much” – on the Fiscal Cliff.
Agent 86 commented on Hillary Clinton Hospitalized With Blood Clot From Her 'Fake' Concussion
2013-01-02 19:27:03 -0500
· Flag
Daily Caller, the NYP and Inquisitr? Is that the best you have for {cough} reputable and non-partisan reporting? Sure she should answer questions re: the failures of Benghazi, just like Bolton, Ingram, and half of Fux News should apologize for their unsubstantiated claims mean to just stir up shit.
Personally I hope her and Bush both get well soon, political BS aside.
Bring on your next post full of right wing rags, blogs and websites. It entertains me.
Personally I hope her and Bush both get well soon, political BS aside.
Bring on your next post full of right wing rags, blogs and websites. It entertains me.
Agent 86 commented on Michelle Malkin Stands Up For ‘Witch Hunt Victim’ NRA
2012-12-22 17:58:24 -0500
· Flag
5 UAVs….4 Abrams tanks…3 M16s….2 Raptor Planes and a Cruise Missile under my tree.
Equal firepower!
Equal firepower!