NewsHounds
We watch Fox so you don't have to!
  • Home
  • About
  • Forum
  • Archives
  • Blogroll
  • Donate
  • Shop
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
Home →

DId Giuliani Let Slip That Some Michael Cohen Recordings Are ‘Harmful’ To Trump?

Posted by Ellen -7452.60pc on July 30, 2018 · Flag

Buried in Rudy Giuliani’s train wreck of an interview today was what sounded a lot like a very damning slip about those recordings that Trump’s former lawyer, Michael Cohen, has.

The discussion about the Cohen recordings occurred after Outnumbered cohost Harris Faulkner steered Giuliani away from his epic failure of an attempt to rehab his two previous train wreck interviews earlier in the day. Now, Faulkner asked about the many secret recordings Cohen reportedly has.

Giuliani replied, “There are only 12 recordings of any substance.” Then he spoke about the rest of the recordings:

GIULIANI: The others are “Call me back,” “See you later,” “The president did this today,” “The president did that today,” “The president said this.” Some of them have a little substance to them but nothing harmful.

Giuliani was not just describing these “other” recordings but distinguishing them from the 12 that he had categorized as substantive. If none of the recordings are “harmful,” why mention that this larger batch is not? Why wouldn’t he have just said, “Some of them have a little substance to them but nothing sensitive” or even “There’s nothing in any of them that is harmful?”

Giuliani also suggested that there’s material personally damning of Trump in the ones that have “a little substance,” just nothing “harmful,” meaning, probably, nothing criminal. But, not surprisingly, Faulkner did not follow up.

Watch Giuliani’s comments about the Cohen Recordings below, from the July 30, 2018 Outnumbered and let me know if you agree he hinted that there’s something harmful in the 12. The relevant part begins at about 19:51.

Follow @NewsHounds

Follow @NewsHoundEllen


Do you like this post?
submit to reddit

Showing 5 reactions



    Review the site rules
Ellen commented 2018-08-05 01:21:06 -0400 · Flag
John, I did not take Janet’s comment that way but even if you are right, she’s still welcome.

Regardless, thank you so much for your unwavering support. I greatly appreciate it.
John McKee commented 2018-08-03 00:52:20 -0400 · Flag
Everyone is free to express their opinion, of course, Ellen, but that little spiel from Janet seemed very dismissive and more than a little spiteful. I hope you understand that many of us greatly appreciate your efforts and enjoy the opportunity to exchange ideas with some very agreeable compadres.
Ellen commented 2018-08-02 23:57:18 -0400 · Flag
Thank you, John.

Janet, we’ll always be glad to see you.
John McKee commented 2018-08-02 13:26:11 -0400 · Flag
I STILL find Newshounds an essential ingredient in my understanding of current events. I might not visit every day, but I make it my business to catch up on Ellen’s take and the comments of some very perspicacious fellow enthusiasts.
Janet Tuhey commented 2018-07-31 11:03:16 -0400 · Flag
Let me state the obvious: He’s a bumbling fool. always has been, always will be.

I have to admit, I rarely come to News Hounds anymore (used to be the first place I went every day). Insannity the rest of the band of clowns on Faux write their own jokes and paint themselves into a corner regularly. Who needs any help editorializing the notsnooze? Just reading the headlines of the articles found here is enough to let me know the scoop and entertain me.










or sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Follow @NewsHounds on Twitter
Subscribe with RSS


We’ve updated our Privacy Policy
×
Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Created with NationBuilder