After a slow start in covering the shooting death of black teenager Trayvon Martin at the hands of self-appointed Neighborhood Watch captain George Zimmerman, Fox News is playing catch-up with more comprehensive coverage today. But on America Live, instead of concentrating on the tragedy itself, Martha McCallum and Trace Gallagher focused on National Rifle Association complaints that the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence were using the shooting to call for tighter controls on firearms, and used selectively edited clips of the 911 tapes to further the Fox spin.
After introducing the piece over a banner that read "Anti-Gun Advocates Use Teen's Death To Go After NRA" - a banner which stayed onscreen throughout the segment - McCallum tossed to Trace Gallagher, saying "...the alleged gunman claiming that it was self defence, and now anti-gun advocates say the 911 calls from some witnesses prove otherewise, and they're using them as ammunition in a new attack on the National Rifle Association."
Gallagher commented on a number of clips from the 911 calls, interjecting facts and comments as he went along, such as the following:
Zimmerman: "He looks black." Gallagher: "He says he thinks he's black but later told police he did not know his race." Good thing you told us that, Trace, just in case some bleeding heart libs try to play the race card or sumthin'. But, gee, why didn't you tell us these pesky facts?
- Moments after Zimmerman said "He looks black," he continued, "He's a black male."
- According to the Miami Herald, the local police chief, Bill Lee, told the paper that the tapes of the 911 calls would prove the incident was not a case of racial profiling, "because when asked whether the suspect was white or black he said he did not know." In other words, the police chief misrepresented what was on the tape - and it appears that Gallagher reported it as if this was a statement made by Zimmerman himself later on.
Gallagher played a few more clips from the 911 tapes - including a harrowing excerpt where Trayvon Martin can be clearly heard crying our for help and then being shot - and then returned to the spin du jour. "Florida is also a "Stand Your Ground" state which means that you can use guns or other deadly force as self defense without backing out of a confrontation. Now, the National Rifle Association backed that law, and now the Brady Campaign, which pushes for tougher gun laws, says that's the NRA's vision for America."
Here is what the Brady Campaign President Dan Gross said:
Make no mistake: This tragic shooting represents the National Rifle Association's vision for America. The NRA's vision is an America that looks just like Florida, where it's easy for criminals and dangerous people to get, carry, and use guns. The NRA wants us to be a nation without any gun laws, a nation where just about anybody can get a gun and take it anywhere. Their leaders and spokespeople use fear, paranoia and misleading notions of self-defense to justify flooding our streets with armed and violent people, and the result is more tragedies like Trayvon's. Trayvon's life has been lost not because of an accident, but because of the easy access to a gun by a violent person permitted by a state with weak gun laws.
Yep, he said it. But isn't that precisely what the NRA do want? I'm sure we'd all be very interested if one of our NRA-supporting readers (we know you're out there) can supply us with evidence which would refute apparent facts such as the ones the Brady Campaign have published here demonstrating that the USA's lax gun laws, lobbied for by the wealthy NRA, make it far too easy for criminals and nutjobs to get hold of guns.
Then, unbelievably, Trace Gallgher wrapped up his report on this horrible tragedy this way:
"It's important to point out that gun sales in this country have never been higher and the crime rate, says the FBI, is very low." * Only on Fox News could a reporter say that to camera with a straight face while recounting the tragic gun death of an innocent teenager.
As the mother of a teenage boy, even typing out Trace Gallagher's weasel words makes me want to cry and scream with anguish and fury. That could have been my son, my heart cries out. That could have been my beautiful boy ambling home from the store in the rain with his hood pulled up, clutching his treats with happy anticipation. It could have been - it might still be - the teenage son of millions of moms and dads. Look at his face, so open, still shining with the light of childhood, the face of a child not quite a man, the face of a loving son that a mother covered with kisses, a son who, like my own, was not embarrassed to hug his mom in public. A face forever lost to his loved ones, a heart forever still. Shame on you, Trace Gallagher. Shame on you, Fox News.
*Nice one, Trace. How low is the crime rate? Where? You didn't specify gun-related crime. According to the Tampa Bay Times, "Since the [Stand Your Ground] law went into effect, reports of justifiable [sic] homicides have tripled, according to the Florida Department of Law Enforcement. It has been used to absolve violence resulting from road rage, barroom arguments and even a gang gunfight." And according to this article analyzing FBI stats through 2010, while gun crime is down in the vast majority of states, it is up in New York, Virginia, New Jersey, Mississippi, Missouri, Arizona, Delaware, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, North Dakota, Connecticut and several of the smaller states. And there are no gun homocide stats available for Florida.
Now, I can’t speak for others, but I have no problem going after CNN and MSNBC when they get caught. But I end up “targeting” Fox News the most because when I put the three networks together, I find that the Fox News host is the one presenting a blatantly dishonest narrative. Not biased, flat dishonest.
In fact… sometimes I write for this site, and the last article I submitted is an example of that.
Bill O’Reilly omitted facts, and misrepresented himself with the intent of lying about what Media Matters said about him. He then smugly (and hypocritically) tried to form the audience’s opinion about his personal feud with said lies.
Since I began fact-checking broadcasts, my daily ratio for every story has been that for every one mistruth I pull out of MSNBC and every half-truth I pull out of CNN, I pull 15 flat-out, no mistake, they’re not even showing enough respect to put on a poker face lies from Fox News. If Rachel Maddow does a story and gets caught in one lie to help the left, chances are that if say… Bill O’Reilly did the same story, I would catch him in at least 15 to help the right. And chances are that at least 10 of those lies are fitted to his inflammitory rhetoric.
And don’t get me started on unprofessional conduct, infammitory language, lack of accountability, polarization and rudeness to the opposing view.
Get it? Got it? Good.
And unless I am mistaken 501©(3) organizations are suppost to be non political.
Nor is a Magazine with articles like:
Why Conservatives Are Still Crazy After All These Years
Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/national-affairs/why-conservatives-are-still-crazy-after-all-these-years-20120316#ixzz1phzdRLBa
Or like this:
The GOP War on Voting
In a campaign supported by the Koch brothers, Republicans are working to prevent millions of Democrats from voting next year
Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-gop-war-on-voting-20110830#ixzz1pi0HriIg
Or how about this:
How the GOP Became the Party of the Rich
The inside story of how the Republicans abandoned the poor and the middle class to pursue their relentless agenda of tax cuts for the wealthiest one percent
Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/how-the-gop-became-the-party-of-the-rich-20111109#ixzz1pi0aTPHF
I mean I could go on, but do I really need to. Tell you all what, why don’t you creat a blog to expose the lies and fear-mongering of Rolling Stone. I mean come on the Republican party is not trying to keep people from voting, that is just ridiculous.
Bottom line is all of our so called News organizations are biased, it is just ridiculous that you all seem to have targeted Fox News because they are about the only ones that lean to the right instead of the left. After all I thought that you Democrats were supposted to be the ones that were all for the 1st amendment, or is that just for people that you agree with.
“You know, at first I figured that the test case for these self defense laws would be some guy coming home, finding a guy in bed with his wife, shooting him and trying to use the Castle Doctrine.
There was a case in the Houston area where a man shot two immigrants, I believe from Africa, because they seemed to be trying to break into a neighbor’s house. Despite incriminating remarks he made to the 911 operator, he was not charged either. I just heard on the news that it looks like the feds are taking over this case in Florida. From what I’ve seen, it looks like they should.
I still support the Castle Doctrine and the Stand Your Ground movement, but like I’ve said, this appears to be total abuse of the spirit of those laws."
I condemn any public figure using sexist language. But this is a blog about Fox News, not MSNBC, and the topic here is not sexist language. Try to stay on topic. Thanks.
Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/taibblog/andrew-breitbart-death-of-a-douche-20120301#ixzz1pg0wa4Mf
No, I don’t think that I am going to be taking their word on how bad Fox news is.
And While we are at it let us talk about Ed Shultz from MSNBC who called Laura Ingram a “Right-wing Slut”. Don’t tell me about how bad Fox is unless you are also willing to condemn MSNBC in the same manner.
1) “That this has nothing to do with race because the gunmen is not white”
- The gunmen is technically 1/4 the Latino and 3/4th white so he is mostly white. But technically he is mix race but the thing is if any of you guys read, the hate between Latinos and African Americans can be just as bad our traditional white on African American hate.
2) “It is okay for Fox news to be bias since it is the only place for the right wing to go blah, blah, blah”
- I am sorry but it is never okay to lie about the truth and cherry pick and distort it. Many people only get their news from Fox and how are we ever going to find a compromise and be able to work together in this country with Fox spouting dangerous lies…. and just FYI I do not agree when the liberals do it either but they seem to do it a lot less.
3)" Liberals just want to take away my Guns"
- This drives me crazy…I am a liberal and yes I shoot guns. My parents and grandparents both own guns and they taught me how to shoot. I have great memories of learning how to shoot with my mom, for example. Infact, I have a very small spread but I am horrible with a shot gun :) So no I do not want take away guns, but I do believe in reasonable laws to protect people. I believe guns and cars are very similar. For example Cars are dangerous and can be used to kill people but they are useful too. So that is why we have people get licenses, take classes to learn how to use them and have to follow laws like speed limits, ect… If they want to drive a car. The most liberals want is this same idea applied to gun control, how is that unreasonable? (not including the crazies)
I’m not a legal expert and don’t claim to be one. Thank you for input on the use of the word “alleged”.
I don’t believe that Fox News spin, lie, deceive, and foster hate and vendettas because I am a liberal. On the contrary – I was always a centrist (if there is such a thing), but it was when I began to smell a rat and started looking behind the Fox News spin after 9/11 that I moved further left and began to identify strongly as liberal. One might say I became a liberal because of Fox News. I did my own homework, and it was that which eventually brought me to NewsHounds as a reader, then a commenter, and finally a writer and support person.
But this issue is not about me — it’s about Fox News. A good look through our archives will show you why we think Fox is so damaging.
You may have noticed that one of the boogeymen of Fox News is Media Matters, and like most conservatives consider them beneath consideration. However, if you spend some time there,too, and really examine their articles, you will find that their information on Fox spin is thoroughly researched and documented. And with all the hysterical hate-mongering Fox do about MM, they have never, to my knowledge, successfully refuted the vast bulk of MM reporting (if any!) and certainly were never able to pick apart David Brock’s books on facts – only on ad hominem arguments.
And if you don’t believe any of us, try this article from Rolling Stone about Fox supremo Roger Ailes:
Have a good day,
First, Fox News is only one news agency on the opposite side of the spectrum of MSNBC, CNN and other similar ratings hungry agencies which are clearly on the progressive end of the spectrum. One should neither get their news from Fox, nor the New York Times. If the other agencies could have outdone Fox, then they would have done so by now.
Second, NRA is not some “top-down” pyramid entity with an owner, shareholders and CEO. NRA is a bottom-up grass roots political action entity that gets its power from 5 to 6 million dues paying members and tens of millions of non-dues paying supporters who can be — and have been — called to action with machine-like precision. NRA is constantly growing and winning 95%+ of its legal battles. Brady Campaign, Bloomberg’s MAIG, and the Joyce Foundation’s oddly named Violence Policy Center can only admire NRA’s phenomenal nationwide grass roots organization and performance from afar and wish that they could perform half as well.
Finally, there was question about the correlation between the sweeping concealed carry reforms that have swept this nation and the reduction of crime. Few people question it. In fact, according to the U.S. Department of Justice’s own National Institute of Justice /Bureau of Justice Statistics, and the FBI Uniform Crime Report — for the last two decades — there are fewer and declining gun crimes and fewer and declining gun accidents where law abiding Americans bear guns in and out of the home. The old failed gun control laws from the post World War II period were proven not to work. Gun control was a miserable failure and only promoted crime. The creation and implementation of “concealed carry reforms” that started with the Florida experiment in 1987, and now include 49 out of 50 states, corresponds closely with the reduction of violent crime and reduction of gun accidents. Wisdom and proven history would dictate leaving these successful reforms in place and even promoting further reforms to include national interstate concealed carry reciprocity and civic responsibility through advanced use-of-force and safety training at a young age similar to the successful small arms training of young people in Switzerland and Israel.
The tragic death of this young man aside, concealed carry reforms are here to stay. To deny them or try to create a wedge issue out of them when there are so many real problems to deal with is unproductive. Most Americans support concealed carry (DOJâs NIJ/BJS) because it works and gun control clearly does not.
Having said that, now that the FBI and DOJ have stepped in the possibility of a trial re-opens, so its better that the major media outlets use use “alleged” – otherwise his defense might be able to claim, successfully, that the chance of a fair trial had been irrevocably prejudiced.