NewsHounds
We watch Fox so you don't have to!
  • Home
  • About
  • Forum
  • Archives
  • Blogroll
  • Donate
  • Shop
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
Home →

What Would Putin Think About Obama Going On Funny Or Die With Zach Galifianakis?

Posted by Ellen -7835.60pc on March 12, 2014 · Flag

Believe it or not, Bill O’Reilly’s chief complaint about President Obama appearing on Funny or Die with Zach Galifianakis yesterday seems to be that Obama will be (further) diminished in the eyes of Russia’s Vladimir Putin as a result. It's a neat twofer - attacking Obama for going on the "Between Two Ferns" show in the first place and then using it to clobber him again over Putin. Sadly, the so-called Democratic strategist let O'Reilly get away with it.

Yesterday, in his Talking Points Memo, O’Reilly said he was “just asking” whether or not the president’s appearance on Funny or Die’s “Between Two Ferns” would help counter the weakness that O’Reilly (and every other Fox rightie) is certain Putin sees in Obama. In the very next segment, O’Reilly put aside the pretext of a question. He repeatedly complained to Democrat Chris Kofinis that Putin sees Obama as a lightweight – even though the only evidence cited was Putin’s “body language”:

KOFINIS: I’m not really worried about Vladimir Putin watching Two Ferns. I think that he’s probably more concerned and more offended by Zach Galafianakis’ ‘Hangover 3’ movie than he is about the president going on…

O'REILLY (interrupting): Why aren’t you concerned, though? Don’t you believe that Putin believes, himself, that President Obama’s not a formidable opponent? …Don’t you think Putin thinks that Obama is a lightweight?

KOFINIS: No.

O’REILLY (interrupting): What evidence formulates that opinion? His body language, his contempt for the United States, his ‘I’ll do what I want and F.U.’ attitude. You think he’s gonna do that to somebody who’s gonna hurt him?

KOFINIS: I think he has his agenda and he is going to pursue that agenda regardless of who the president is.

That was well done on Kofinis' part as far as it went. But Kofinis is another one of those nice, likeable Democrats who goes on Fox and rarely, if ever, challenges its agenda. It's not that Kofinis didn't make intelligent, reasonable and well-spoken points, it's that that's not what O'Reilly or Fox is really about. Why Kofinis didn’t demand O’Reilly provide evidence that Putin has based any of his Ukraine decisions on his perception that the United States is weak or that he would possibly care that the president appeared on Funny or Die is beyond me. Just the very notion that Obama should decide which interview to do based on what Putin thinks suggests more weakness than any “signal” sent from the Funny or Die set.

Kofinis did kinda sorta go after Republicans for criticizing Obama in the middle of the Ukraine crisis.

O'REILLY: The point is perception, is it not? Isn’t perception important in this world with the crazy North Korean guy, the mullahs in Iran, Putin running around topless and killing tigers or whatever he’s doing on Thursday? Isn’t it perception and right now don’t we have a perception problem in this country?

KOFINIS: Perception is clearly an element when you’re talking about international politics. But Bill, if you want to make it a point about perception, then I think you can be fair to criticize Republicans and others who basically are openly criticizing the president during an international crisis.

That’s about as mild a challenge to the attacks as could possibly be made. But Kofinis immediately mitigated that by adding that he thinks it fair to criticize the president “for what show he’s going on or not.”

So there you have it, ladies and gentlemen. A Fox News host talks up the prowess of a Russian dictator as part of a bloviating harangue against our president over an internet interview which, by the way, did its job of promoting health insurance to young people. And a so-called Democratic strategist pussyfoots in his responses.

Follow @NewsHounds

Follow @NewsHoundEllen

)


Do you like this post?
Tweet

Showing 5 reactions



    Review the site rules
Joseph West commented 2014-03-13 17:21:49 -0400 · Flag
Visitor: On Jan 20, 2009, when the “blah” guy was inaugurated and set up home in the White House. (One could actually make an argument for the late hours of Nov 4, 2008 after the media called the election in Obama’s favor.)
Sandman2 commented 2014-03-13 09:34:27 -0400 · Flag
Bill’s jealousy toward another press interviewer is just ugly!

(snark)
Scott from Toronto commented 2014-03-13 06:48:27 -0400 · Flag
Excellent point James. If Fox was so concerned over the image of their president, they would have him in a non-stop, military hero- style image loop on their station. Not one critical word would be uttered about him, especially in this turbulent time that we’re in.
James commented 2014-03-13 01:48:22 -0400 · Flag
What I find most curious about this is the (surprising) lack of self-awareness and obvious projection by the right — which most definitely includes O’Reilly.

Assuming for the moment that Putin and/or his people base their opinions of our government and president on what they see in American media, what is more likely to shape that opinion: a single 5-minute streaming video from a comedy website, or the non-stop, 24/7 bash-fest of the American administration by a prominent cable “news” channel?
NewsHounds posted about What Would Putin Think About Obama Going On Funny Or Die With Zach Galifianakis? on NewsHounds' Facebook page 2014-03-12 20:06:51 -0400
Because everything Obama does should be based on what Putin might think.








or sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Follow @NewsHounds on Twitter
Subscribe with RSS


We’ve updated our Privacy Policy
×
Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Created with NationBuilder