NewsHounds
We watch Fox so you don't have to!
  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Forum
  • Blogroll
  • Donate
  • Shop
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
Home →

Geraldo Schools O’Reilly On That New York Paper Printing The Addresses Of Local Gun Owners

Posted by Ellen -7859.80pc on January 06, 2013 · Flag

Finally, someone on Fox got it and explained it about that upstate New York newspaper which published the names and addresses of gun owners. It’s a story that Fox has been harping on incessantly and almost entirely from a biased, distorted and definitely unbalanced perspective. But on Friday night’s O’Reilly Factor (1/4/13), Geraldo Rivera helped nudge the scales back a tad.

It started with some fresh outrage about this never-ending faux controversy (this time over the “outrageous” comments by a former New York City official named Mark Green). But within seconds, Rivera changed the subject:

I don’t really have a big problem with the newspaper doing that… I am the parent of a 7 year-old. I’d like to know what families own guns before I let my kid go over to play or a sleep over. I think that it’s legit. I think the newspaper under the law of New York has an absolute right to publish it.

As I wrote in my previous post, that's really the heart of why the paper did it. There are people who want to know - and have a right to know, at least under New York law - if there neighbor has a stash of weapons. Yet Fox News is so obsessed with the rights of gun owners, they never seem to care a fig about the rights of everyone else.

Of course, O’Reilly disagreed haughtily, saying it's a privacy issue. Still, he didn’t have much comeback for Rivera’s concerns about his child's safety. But any ruffled feathers were surely soothed as Rivera began slobbering over O’Reilly’s “getting” ex-Marine Jon Hammar out of prison in Mexico. “You are singularly responsible, I think, for his freedom,” Rivera gushed. “And I think you put enormous pressure on Mexico, as you should have, on the State Department, as you should have, and even on newspapers like the New York Times for not covering the story.”

Follow @NewsHounds

Follow @NewsHoundEllen


Do you like this post?
Tweet

Showing 7 reactions



    Review the site rules
truman commented 2013-01-07 13:54:49 -0500 · Flag
When dealing with egotistical Bildo, Whorealdo toes the line between mildly disagreement and a blatant blow job. This segment had elements of both.
Joe Marsh commented 2013-01-07 02:06:24 -0500 · Flag
Rivera — for all his grandstanding — has a bit of common sense. It’s unfortunate that he has to show it on FNC (as well as his own radio show on right-wing WABC radio, the home of Slanthead).

I know that this may bother some of the regulars here, but I think Geraldo was absolutely correct about the impact of hoodies (try living only a few blocks from a major housing project for 40 years!).

BTW Ellen, that paper is in Westchester County, a suburb right outside NYC, and in no geographical or political way considered “upstate.” Considering that many parts of upstate New York, and the pitchfork-toting inhabitants there, could be mistaken for Tennessee hollers, then it really would be a bold move if the paper were there.
Joseph West commented 2013-01-07 01:43:24 -0500 · Flag
(Inadvertently hit the “post” button on my last comment.)

What should have been added was that I do NOT recall any of the right-wing noise machine arguing that the website was doing anything wrong—unlike now when it’s somehow infringing on the 2nd Amendment. Of course, it’s even more interesting that there’s actually nothing in the 2nd Amendment that offers any “privacy rights” regarding gun ownership being made public.
Joseph West commented 2013-01-07 01:38:19 -0500 · Flag
How funny. Several years ago, when an anti-abortion group decided to post the names and addresses of abortion providers on their website (with convenient “target” markers on them), several of the physicians went to court claiming that their lives were being put in danger. The court disagreed, basically saying it was the public’s right to know. (As to the safety issue, the court’s ruling basically said that UNTIL someone was killed as a DIRECT RESULT of the website’s posting, the “free speech” principle was more important than a mere “possibility” of someone’s being hurt or killed.)
Kent Brockman commented 2013-01-06 22:47:29 -0500 · Flag
With 29 hit pieces aimed at getting a doctor murdered (and succeeding), Killer O’Reilly should check his script with, let’s say, Andrea Makris, who has a keen ear for psychopathic man-gab. Of course once an intelligent person edits Killer’s script his entire segment will consist of:

“I’m Killer O’Reilly and that’s all I have to say. Good night!”

Hate-filled Rupert Murdoch, the Master Enabler of all this Fux Nuze Assassination/Fatwa Machinery would find it hard to justify keeping the Hateful Liars of Fux Nuze in his employ. And that would be good!
Dadeo commented 2013-01-06 22:19:21 -0500 · Flag
So sorry O’Reilly, you had NOTHING to do with getting the Marine out. Time to take your ego out for a walk.
U Mad? commented 2013-01-06 19:15:08 -0500 · Flag
Well, there’s already a woman who bought a gun after getting out of an abusive relationship that is scared now because her name and address have been put out there and is scared that her former husband can now find her.

Prison Guards are also being harrassed by inmates taunting them telling them they know where they and their families live.

So yeah, good job.








or sign in with Facebook or email.
Follow @NewsHounds on Twitter
Subscribe with RSS


We’ve updated our Privacy Policy
Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Created with NationBuilder