NewsHounds
We watch Fox so you don't have to!
  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Forum
  • Blogroll
  • Donate
  • Shop
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
Home →

Freudian Slip? Hannity Likens Trump’s Ukraine Aid Behavior To Deciding Against Committing Robbery Or Ripping ‘Someone’s Face Off’

Posted by Ellen -7859.80pc on January 29, 2020 · Flag

Sean Hannity’s tirade against calling witnesses in the Trump impeachment trial included a suggestion that Trump had contemplated committing a serious crime by withholding aid to Ukraine. But since he never did it, there's nothing to see here.

As a graphic blaring “THOUGHT CRIMES” took up half the screen, Hannity put forth an argument reminiscent of O.J. Simpson’s “If I Did It.”

HANNITY: President Trump is allowed to talk. He's allowed to vent. He's allowed to exchange ideas with his close advisers. That is not a crime. It's kind of like, well, you tell your friend I want to rob this jewelry store. I want to rob this grocery store, convenience store. Oh, I'm going to punch this guy in the face. I'm going to rip somebody's face off. But you never do it. You weren't seriously plotting the act. That would not be a crime, now would it? We all think about things, thoughts flow through our brains constantly, at least if you're a conservative. And when you think about things, that's not a crime in any way. 

That section of Hannity’s monologue begins at about 9:10 in the video below, from the January 28, 2020 Hannity show.

Follow @NewsHounds

Follow @NewsHoundEllen


Do you like this post?
Tweet

Showing 5 reactions



    Review the site rules
Bemused commented 2020-01-30 11:57:26 -0500 · Flag
Oops. That should be “do ut des”. Funny how a bad translation from the 17th Century became a cornerstone of law in English.
Bemused commented 2020-01-30 10:12:29 -0500 · Flag
Something that is not being given sufficient attention is the fact that the Obama administration’s caution towards Ukraine was motivated by real concern about corruption. Faced with no progress on this front, only humanitarian aid was on offer. That’s an acceptable quid pro quo (or do ut es, in Europe).

After his election, Zelensky moved quickly to address the problem and Congress voted (bipartisanly) to include lethal weaponry in the package and the competent agencies gave the green light. Again, an acceptable quid pro quo.

Using that same aid as leverage to get Zelensky to announce an investigation motivated by personal gain is not an acceptable quid pro quo. It’s abuse of power. An example of cheating by two-bit dictators and tyrants.
Glenn Moseley commented 2020-01-29 15:04:49 -0500 · Flag
Before you take the motor out, scan for codes and obvious wear. In the case of Hannity, at first glance I’m seeing massive amounts of inbreeding. Once it’s cranked up, it spews pathological, this lends itself to a spoiled discount powdered Kool-Aid knock off with massive amounts of sugar. Probably a junker, crush and sell the scrap to Mother Russia. I’m sure Air Force One can carry it in cargo next trip.
scooter commented 2020-01-29 14:34:31 -0500 · Flag
Sure traitor, whatever you say. To paraphrase Clarence Darrow, I don’t wish him harm, but I will read his obituary with great pleasure.
John McKee commented 2020-01-29 14:22:30 -0500 · Flag
It would take more than Freud to fully divine the origins and the extent of whatever foul disease has laid waste to the grey lump at the top of Sean Hannity’s spine. I would defer to the professionals, of course, but I suggest immediate dissection would be the obvious first step in any investigation.








or sign in with Facebook or email.
Follow @NewsHounds on Twitter
Subscribe with RSS


We’ve updated our Privacy Policy
Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Created with NationBuilder