NewsHounds
We watch Fox so you don't have to!
  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Forum
  • Blogroll
  • Donate
  • Shop
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
Home →

Fox’s John Bolton Complains Americans Freed From Iran Is ‘Diplomatic Debacle' For The US

Posted by Ellen -7859.80pc on January 16, 2016 · Flag

 Bolton_sour_grapes.png

Despite the Fox News doom and gloom about how the negotiated return of 10 U.S. sailors “emboldened” Iran for more aggression, that country just released five U.S. prisoners today. So, naturally, Fox wasted little time looking for excuses to gripe about that, too.

So who better to dig up, if you want to make sure to find some s*** in there somewhere, than John Bolton, the chickenhawk who’s been salivating for war against Iran for years?

Just in case Bolton didn’t get the hint, anchor Kelly Wright began the discussion by saying that “obviously” the families are “ecstatic” at the prisoners’ release and that the White House “calls it a diplomatic victory” but, Wright added, “yet outside of the administration, many say the president capitulated to the Iranians by releasing seven Iranian prisoners, the White House says it was a good will gesture. How do you describe the situation, as a former ambassador?”

Of course, Bolton said just what he was booked to say:

BOLTON: Well, it’s obviously wonderful for the American hostages and their families but it’s a diplomatic debacle for the United States. Remember, it’s not just seven Iranians who are being released. The other 14 who would have been charged for sanctions violations – one was accused of cyber attacks – the math here is roughly 21 Iranians in exchange for four, maybe it’s five, Americans. That’s not exactly high-powered negotiation. But even worse, and I think this is the key point, the Americans weren’t prisoners in Iran, they were hostages.

…To say that victims of terrorism are the equivalent of criminals or alleged criminals gives Iran an enormous victory and again, while I certainly understand the happiness of the families involved, the question for the U.S. government is always in this situation, are we simply incentivizing Iran to take further hostages and are we incentivizing other governments or terrorist groups around the world to do the same? And I’m afraid that’s the conclusion they’ll draw, that the United States will deal for hostages. Now the price is gonna go up.

Wright pressed for more, asking Bolton what his “concerns” and “suspicions” are “moving forward.”

BOLTON: They’ve been doing it for 36 years… because successive American governments have not been willing to make it clear to them that we do not accept Americans being taken hostage as an act of terrorism, we won’t deal with this regime and the cost to them is gonna be high. I think the administration is so desperate to keep this nuclear deal on track, it’s a wonder the Iranians didn’t get even more money or more assets or more in exchange for these four Americans.

…The cost may be more Americans taken, either by Iran or by others down the road.

By the way, in September, 2008, Bolton predicted that if then-candidate Barack Obama was elected president, it would be just a matter of time before Iran obtained a nuclear bomb because "we've exhausted the diplomatic option."

Watch it below, from today’s coverage:

Follow @NewsHounds

Follow @NewsHoundEllen


Do you like this post?
Tweet

Showing 14 reactions



    Review the site rules
radpat_USA commented 2016-01-18 11:20:35 -0500 · Flag
mlp ! …..“When the War On Stupid” comes, these rightwing freaks will have no choice, uh?
mlp ! commented 2016-01-17 08:26:40 -0500 · Flag
Yes, they ALL want war…but NONE of them want to fight in it.
Richard Santalone commented 2016-01-17 08:16:14 -0500 · Flag
From Steve Newton’s comment:

“They all want war.”

Indeed they do Steve — as mj brilliantly pointed out earlier, “Talking Toilet Brush” John Bolton, Sean KKKlannity, Bully O’Lielly and the rest of their PFC (Privileged Fascist Chickenhawk) colleagues at Faux Spews will ALWAYS, ALWAYS be gung ho for war — as long as not a single one of THEIR military aged loved ones are the ones getting shot at, crippled, maimed or KILLED!
Eyes On Fox commented 2016-01-17 06:32:10 -0500 · Flag
Okay, finally caught the Fox News spin the hostage swap sucks like everything Obama does. “Fox And Friends” previously whined there was no hostage deal as part of the nuke deal. So there’s a deal and some con jokster is softballed on “Fox And Friends” whining this ‘horrible’ deal was intertwined with the nuke deal. Really?

Oh, such a treat! The curvy couch bobble-heads just announced John Bolton is coming up to trash the hostage swap.

This is going to be the right-wing Fox News meme of the day.
David Lindsay commented 2016-01-17 00:27:49 -0500 · Flag
mj I can kind of understand a young man being hesitant to join a lost cause even if he might have the inclination to see war.

I knew a guy who lied about his age and got into the Vietnam War right near the end. From one of his stories, it sure does sound like he was present at a fragging even though he didn’t witness it. His brother veterans didn’t share his enthusiasm for volunteering.

The point is, even if Mr. bomb em back to the stone age Bolton had experienced a small taste of war he wouldn’t be the cartoon Rambo he is.
mj - the same one commented 2016-01-16 22:34:34 -0500 · Flag
@scooter: Slight correction; yes, the Talking Toilet Brush does want a fight, but, like most rightwingnut chickenshit chickenhawks, he doesn’t want to participate in that fight HIMSELF — if his thoughts on Vietnam are any indication:

Bolton supported the Vietnam War, enlisted in the Maryland Army National Guard and consequently did not serve in Vietnam. He wrote in his Yale 25th reunion book “I confess I had no desire to die in a Southeast Asian rice paddy. I considered the war in Vietnam already lost.” In an interview, Bolton discussed his comment in the reunion book, explaining that he decided to avoid service in Vietnam because “by the time I was about to graduate in 1970, it was clear to me that opponents of the Vietnam War had made it certain we could not prevail, and that I had no great interest in going there to have Teddy Kennedy give it back to the people I might die to take it away from.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_R.Bolton#Early_life_andeducation

.
scooter commented 2016-01-16 22:12:36 -0500 · Flag
John Bolton just wants to have a gun and a bomb and go kill his-self some A-Rabs. He wants to fight with anybody. Diplomacy is the pussy way out in his tiny warped mind. Fucking sicko should be tried for treason.
mj - the same one commented 2016-01-16 20:28:56 -0500 · Flag
Bolton has spoken in favor of the People’s Mujahedin of Iran (also known as the Mujahedin-e Khalq, or MEK), “an armed Islamic group with Marxist leanings” which has long been on the U.S. State Department list of Foreign Terrorist Organizations. According to the State Department, the MEK “[f]ollow[s] a philosophy that mixes Marxism and Islam.” In the 1970s, MEK members, who “had been trained by the Soviet Union in guerilla warfare and supported Khomeini . . . assassinated U.S. military officers then working in Iran. MEK members actively took part in the 1979 seizure of the U.S. embassy in Tehran, according to a U.S. government report.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_R._Bolton

Hey, Johnny Boy — since you think the release of American hostages held by Iran for years was a “diplomatic debacle”, simply because it occurred under an African American Democratic President (I wonder if it was a “debacle” when the hostages were freed minutes after Raygun’s inauguration), and since you seem so fond of Iranian terrorist groups . . . how ‘bout next time an Iranian or other ME terrorist group takes Americans hostage, we’ll just offer to exchange you for them?

It’ll be a win all around: you get to go over and PERSONALLY express your admiration to these groups, we get Americans back on our soil, and we’ll no longer be subject to the rantings of a warmongering, rightwingnut POS like you . . .

.
David Lindsay commented 2016-01-16 20:27:58 -0500 · Flag
Maybe finally resolving things with Iran and normalizing things will somehow make these creeps disappear. It was Iran that really brought along the Reagan revolution. I’d like to see the whole lot of these holier than thou fake wannabe patriots wither up and blow away.
truman commented 2016-01-16 20:11:20 -0500 · Flag
The mere thought of a war with Iran gets Talking Toilet Brush Bolton erect.
Bill Friday commented 2016-01-16 18:59:28 -0500 · Flag
Faux beat on Obama like a rented mule about these guys!
All you heard for the last year and a half was how much he hated America and didn’t care about these prisoners!
Now we find out the USA has been involved in sensitive behind the scenes talks for the last 14 month’s to get them back!!!
Do you think Faux will apologize?
I don’t think so!! LOL
Jan Hall commented 2016-01-16 18:22:43 -0500 · Flag
Nobody died, is always a bad day for Body-Count Bolton.
Eyes On Fox commented 2016-01-16 17:15:20 -0500 · Flag
Fox News spin is idiotic. The sailors were released so quickly many Fox News pundits have switched to the spin they wouldn’t have been taken in the first place if a manly, warmongering Republican was in office. 👍
Steve Newton commented 2016-01-16 17:03:08 -0500 · Flag
They all want war. So diplomacy is seen as weakness.








or sign in with Facebook or email.
Follow @NewsHounds on Twitter
Subscribe with RSS


We’ve updated our Privacy Policy
Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Created with NationBuilder