NewsHounds
We watch Fox so you don't have to!
  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Forum
  • Blogroll
  • Donate
  • Shop
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
Home →

Fox’s Guilfoyle Would Love To Be Attorney General So She Can Indict Hillary Clinton

Posted by Ellen -7859.80pc on February 08, 2016 · Flag

Guilfoyle_for_AG_blog.png

In an epic bit of Fox News "fairness and balance," Sean Hannity suggested that colleague Kimberly Guilfoyle become the next attorney general so that she can indict Hillary Clinton. Guilfoyle’s response? “Put me in coach!”

At about 10:34 in the video below, Hannity and Guilfoyle began the following exchange:

HANNITY: Maybe you should be the next Attorney General. Because if it’s a Republican administration, you could indict Hillary.

GUILFOYLE: There you go!

HANNITY: There you go, that works, right?

GUILFOYLE: Yeah, yeah, put me in, coach.

I thought Putin-admiring Guilfoyle couldn’t get any more biased after her New Year’s Eve Donald Trump slobberfest. But I may well have been wrong.

Watch it below, from the February 5 Hannity.

Follow @NewsHounds

Follow @NewsHoundEllen


Do you like this post?
Tweet

Showing 4 reactions



    Review the site rules
El 84 commented 2016-02-10 12:54:26 -0500 · Flag
It’s an opinion show. Fox used to tout “Fair and Balanced” in reference to its news programming (and Billo twisted that around to justify his b.s.). If it were an anchor on one of its “straight” news shows, the premise would make more sense.
George Dimopoulos commented 2016-02-09 05:21:30 -0500 · Flag
This knucklehead is an attorney or was…seriously,Clinton would destroy her.
Joseph West commented 2016-02-09 02:18:09 -0500 · Flag
mj, stop being so silly. Everyone knows that the US Attorney General doesn’t need any reason to indict people. I mean, who needs to file charges when a name is reason enough to indict?

Hey. Maybe we could send a recommendation to current US Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, to indict Guilfoyle? I know Guilfoyle would probably fight it, wanting to know the reason, but we could point out to Ms Lynch that Guilfoyle apparently thinks the Attorney General can simply indict people for no particular reason.
mj - the same one commented 2016-02-09 01:24:12 -0500 · Flag
Oh, Seannie Poo — mind telling us exactly WHAT Guiltfoil would indict Mrs. Clinton for, considering she isn’t under investigation and hasn’t been charged with anything?

NOTE: BPWB (Being President While Black) does not apply in this case (and isn’t a valid reason, anyway.)

.








or sign in with Facebook or email.
Follow @NewsHounds on Twitter
Subscribe with RSS


We’ve updated our Privacy Policy
Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Created with NationBuilder