On yesterday’s Fox News Sunday, host Chris Wallace seemed to take it as a given that the Supreme Court will rule against the Obama administration in both the health care mandate and the Arizona immigration law cases. So he opened the panel discussion segment by asking “how damaging” such rulings would be to Obama’s re-election efforts.

Wallace noted in his introduction that “court watchers say it’s always dangerous to read too much into the questions the Justices ask and therefore to predict how they’re going to rule.” But that didn’t stop him from adding that “there was a widespread perception” that the Supreme Court “did not think that much” of the Obama administration’s argument against the Arizona immigration law “just as they seemed skeptical of the President’s Obama Care, at least in the individual mandate.”

Wallace continued, “Let’s present a hypothetical: How damaging to the President, if in June the Court were to rule that this former Constitutional law professor/President was on the wrong side of the Constitution both on the Arizona law and on ObamaCare?”

Wallace never presented the option that Obama might win even one of the cases.