NewsHounds
We watch Fox so you don't have to!
  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Forum
  • Blogroll
  • Donate
  • Shop
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
Home →

Fox News Begs Democrats Reconsider Shunning Network Debate, Promising ‘Ultimate Journalistic Integrity’

Posted by Ellen -7859.80pc on March 06, 2019 · Flag

Sorry, Fox News, you can’t serve as the propaganda arm of the Donald Trump administration, spend almost every other minute demonizing Democrats and then claim that your network would be a great place to hold a Democratic presidential primary debate.

Although the Democrats shouldn’t have needed Jane Mayer’s New Yorker bombshell to push them definitively into deciding against holding a debate on Fox News, the decision was better late than never. Today’s Washington Post reported this statement from Democratic National Committee Chairman Tom Perez:

“I believe that a key pathway to victory is to continue to expand our electorate and reach all voters,” said Perez in his statement to The Washington Post. “That is why I have made it a priority to talk to a broad array of potential media partners, including Fox News. Recent reporting in the New Yorker on the inappropriate relationship between President Trump, his administration and Fox News has led me to conclude that the network is not in a position to host a fair and neutral debate for our candidates. Therefore, Fox News will not serve as a media partner for the 2020 Democratic primary debates.”

Among other things, the New Yorker article reported that Fox News spiked a report on Trump’s hush money to Stormy Daniels before the election (the rest of us found out afterward) and that debate questions were fed to Trump in advance of its 2015 Republican primary debate.

As The Post noted, presidential debates are great vehicles for both prestige and ratings. So it’s not surprising that Fox News would try to put its best lipstick on its propaganda pig by groveling.

In a statement, Fox News Senior Vice President Bill Sammon said: “We hope the DNC will reconsider its decision to bar Chris Wallace, Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum, all of whom embody the ultimate journalistic integrity and professionalism, from moderating a Democratic presidential debate. They’re the best debate team in the business and they offer candidates an important opportunity to make their case to the largest TV news audience in America, which includes many persuadable voters.”

There’s something really pathetic about a cable news network having to promise “ultimate journalistic integrity and professionalism,” as if that would not be a given. It all but acknowledges that top ratings-getter, prime time host, and Trump's unofficial chief of staff and Bedtime BFF Sean Hannity is something less than.

But even worse than the pro-Trump bias is the steady diet of demonizing Democrats. On Fox, Democrats are regularly smeared as dangerous enemies of America.

So, Fox News, you’ll have to do more than suggest nobody will ask the candidates why they hate America and love “illegals” so much or whether they support the Mueller “witch hunt” or if they’ll promise to re-open an investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails during a debate. You’ll have to start displaying the same integrity and professionalism you promise on debate night even when it’s not so expedient. Because that’s when it really counts.

For a good example of why Democrats should never have considered Fox as an appropriate debate platform, watch Fox Business host Lou Dobbs get a friendly platform to accuse Democrats of “destroying a nation” as they “foam at the mouth and [have] blood drip from their fangs” below. It was part of the prime time Tucker Carlson Tonight show’s September 28, 2018 coverage of the Senate confirmation hearings of Brett Kavanaugh.

(Hannity image via screen grab)

Follow @NewsHounds

Follow @NewsHoundEllen


Do you like this post?
Tweet

Showing 8 reactions



    Review the site rules
Ellen commented 2019-03-07 17:35:56 -0500 · Flag
Bob Roberts, I totally agree MacCallum is the worst. All three of them have the ability to do decent journalism. The problem, as I see it, is not that Wallace or Baier are so bad, it’s that they will probably be told to ask questions like, “Why don’t you support an investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails if you support one into Trump’s finances?” And even if they manage to ask questions that matter to Democrats (it’s the DEMOCRATIC primary, for Chrissakes), Fox will surely devote extra time to “analyzing” the debate which will be a Trump sales job. If the debate is on another network, Fox will still tear down the candidates (and the network host) but I doubt they will spend quite as much time or have quite the same platform for it.
scooter commented 2019-03-07 12:10:12 -0500 · Flag
FOX should be shunned entirely by the DNC, and all Democrats. There is no reason to go on their air, ever. We all know what they do – why give them fuel for their fire? We will never ever reach the people who watch FOX. They are gone, lost for all time, and good riddance. America doesn’t need more people who don’t think critically, which pretty much describes the average FOX viewer. They are mindless proles, incapable of rational thought or reasoning. Leave them to the shallow end of the gene pool and move on without them. Eventually attrition will take care of them.
Thx4 Fish commented 2019-03-07 11:20:29 -0500 · Flag
I do agree with Tom Perez’ decision. There is much more to lose than gain in having a Fox hosted Dem debate. Fox simply can’t have its cake and eat it. They can’t both be the mouthpiece of the president and an unbiased news organization. Fox needs to be put on notice that its symbiotic relationship with Trump is not acceptable.
John McKee commented 2019-03-07 08:32:09 -0500 · Flag
I’ll never forget MacCallum talking down her nose at Obama’s first inauguration, throwing snobby shade on Michelle’s beautiful gown with “That colour (I think it was green) doesn’t usually suit these people.”
Eyes On Fox commented 2019-03-06 23:22:28 -0500 · Flag
Who exactly are the “persuadable voters” who watch Fox News? Never met one.
Bob Roberts commented 2019-03-06 22:26:30 -0500 · Flag
No one on Faux is legitimate………except for Shepard Smith. McCallum is the worst of the three mentioned as non-partisan.
Kevin Koster commented 2019-03-06 20:44:45 -0500 · Flag
Donald Trump is now threatening not to have any debates on any network but Fox News. Sounds like we may not have any debates next year. Let’s see how it turns out.

Fox News is not a legitimate news service, and the names they’ve cited are not legitimate journalists. Bret Baier and Martha McCallum and Chris Wallace have all been exhaustively proven to be partisan promoters. Fox News should be thinking not about the debates but rather how it will deal with accounting for itself in the event that Dems show up for the 2020 election. Because they will not be able to walk back their shameful conduct over the past two decades and their openly outrageous conduct of the past three years.
mlp ! commented 2019-03-06 17:47:02 -0500 · Flag
Democrats should NEVER appear on Fox for any reason.
Being on humiliated on Fox is not a good way to “reach out to all voters”.








or sign in with Facebook or email.
Follow @NewsHounds on Twitter
Subscribe with RSS


We’ve updated our Privacy Policy
Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Created with NationBuilder