NewsHounds
We watch Fox so you don't have to!
  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Forum
  • Blogroll
  • Donate
  • Shop
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
Home →

Bill O’Reilly’s Big Investigation Into Occupy Wall Street Short On Facts, Long On Unsubstantiated Allegations And Attempts To Smear Obama

Posted by Ellen -7859.80pc on May 23, 2012 · Flag

Remember how Monday night, Bill O’Reilly promised an investigation into the funding of Occupy Wall Street? That “investigation” proved to be nothing less than a hazy suggestion that Fox News boogeyman George Soros is the behind-the-scenes financier. Oh, O’Reilly didn’t exactly say so. What he said was that the non-profit Institute for Policy Studies, which he claimed (without any evidence) runs OWS, accepts money from Soros’ Tides Foundation.  Therefore, without bothering to tell anyone how much money from Tides goes to the supposed Occupy-masterminds or for what purpose, the viewers were left to draw their own conclusion that Soros is really controlling the purse strings. Mixed up in all that was O’Reilly’s and then guest Monica Crowley’s malicious attempts to use the Occupy movement as a vehicle to attack President Obama.

In last night's Talking Points Memo, the editorial that opens nearly every O’Reilly Factor show, O’Reilly said, “The Factor has been investigating who, exactly, is behind the Occupy Movement which is now very well organized and no longer a citizen protest. Rather it is a hard-core, far-left movement designed to cause as much trouble as possible. The sincere Occupiers left a long time ago. What’s left are the professional agitators.”

How does O’Reilly know that? What did he base that conclusion on? His encounter with what he claimed was an Occupy “terrorist” last week? I hate to say this, Bill, but it sounds like you’re spinning.

O'Reilly added,

The Occupy Movement is now being run out of Washington, D.C. in offices belonging to The Institute for Policy Studies, a far-left outfit. 

When O’Reilly says “far left,” what he really means is that’s your cue to despise them. But the fact of the matter is that IPS, while unabashedly liberal, is a serious, respected organization. In a blog post about O’Reilly’s attack, director John Cavanagh noted:

We have worked on the issue of inequality for two decades. We host one of the leading web sites for facts, figures and analysis, www.inequality.org. Our annual Executive Excess report, now in its 18th year, garners major mainstream media coverage on the growing gap between CEO and worker pay. Recently, IPS was invited to give testimony on this research to the Senate Budget Committee.

Furthermore, Cavanagh disputes O’Reilly’s description that IPS “runs” the Occupy Movement.

Starting last fall, IPS conducted workshops on inequality, environmental justice, and ending wars, with Occupy DC. We offered to let them use our space for meetings when the weather was bad or on weekends. Two weeks ago, IPS offered them space in our offices where they are producing an online newspaper called DC Mic Check. SEIU, the dynamic union of janitors and other service workers, has made a contribution to help us cover the costs.

Cavanagh also stated that O’Reilly did not contact the Institute before accusing it of being co-masterminds with SEIU of Occupy. So where did “No Spin Zone” O’Reilly get his “information” and why didn’t he tell us? Sorry again, Bill, but this is not looking out for us.

O’Reilly continued, “(Cavanagh’s) non-profit institute accepts money from  – surprise! George Soros through The Tides Foundation!”

O’Reilly went on to say – also unsourced – that SEIU foots the rent bill for the Occupy Movement. And then O’Reilly gratuitously added that the current and former heads of the SEIU had visited the White House “a number of times.”

So without directly saying so, O’Reilly spun his “findings” to suggest that President Obama is in bed with the Occupy Movement.

“The goal of the Occupiers is no longer to raise awareness of economic injustice, it is to disturb the peace and attack those with whom they disagree,” O’Reilly warned. Once again, he didn’t say what he based that conclusion on. But he did use it to attack Obama:

It is long past time for President Obama to condemn the anarchistic element of the Occupiers, which is now dominant. Instead, the President falls back on ‘protecting freedom of speech’ platitudes. (said with disdain) Sure. Tell that to the Chicago cop who got stabbed, Mr. President.

Then, instead of presenting anyone who did any actual investigating or who had any real knowledge of Occupy funding or organizing, Alan Colmes and Monica Crowley came on to debate O'Reilly's “findings.” Colmes is normally terrific in his weekly appearances on The Factor but I wish he had called O’Reilly on his sleight-of-hand maneuvers.

Meanwhile, Fox News’ chief conspiracy theorist Monica Crowley had her own unsubstantiated “conclusions” to impart. She told O’Reilly that Obama can’t denounce the movement. Why?

Occupy Wall Street was set up and orchestrated and executed for two reasons: One, to supply Barack Obama with his central campaign theme of income inequality. 

… And number two, to create enough chaos and disorder in this country to justify two things: Either A) a government crackdown or B) to justify any kind of activity to get the redistributionist agenda through. …This is all about destroying the economic system in order to destroy the political system.

That was too much even for O’Reilly. Although he’s been fear mongering about the Occupiers for two days (calling them “terrorists” the night before) and suggesting they’re cozy with Obama, O’Reilly now told Crowley that the movement wasn’t big enough to destroy our political system. He also pointed out now that the Occupiers are no fans of Obama. Well, better late than never, Bill.

Now O’Reilly sounded quite a bit less antagonistic to Obama as he said, “It is a tremendous mistake for Barack Obama not to repudiate (the Occupiers)… Prediction time: He’s going to repudiate them soon.”

O’Reilly went on to say he thinks “somebody’s gonna get killed… I absolutely do.”

Too bad he didn’t have the same concern when he was demonizing and inciting hatred for Dr. George Tiller.

 


Do you like this post?
Tweet

Showing 11 reactions



    Review the site rules
Aria Prescott commented 2012-05-23 22:55:59 -0400 · Flag
Bill O’Reilly wants to play this game? Fine…

I got quite a list of frauds, rapists, domestic terrorists and so forth from the Tea Party that I haven’t broken out in a long time. How about I name them off and Bill show me where he condemned them?

Oh, right…
Kevin Koster commented 2012-05-23 21:45:18 -0400 · Flag
I find it interesting that Crowley has never been asked on Fox about her swipe at Sandra Fluke on the occasion of her engagement. Anytime a Democrat or someone Fox doesn’t like has a verbal gaffe, the clip runs on a loop forever. Crowley makes an openly nasty and demeaning statement and it’s immediately dropped. I’ll give her credit for apologizing – but apologies haven’t earned non-Fox commentators any leeway on that network…
Bob Roberts commented 2012-05-23 16:05:38 -0400 · Flag
I watched the rerun of this last night to see what “facts” O’Loofah dug up with his “investigation”. As Anna-Claire said below, all we got was some same old same old. IPS runs Occupy, with aid from……….drum roll…………George Soros and the unions. And since union people have met with the White House, then the Pres. is running Occupy too. American cities are burning. Police are being assaulted with no provocation (well thats the conclusion you are supposed to come to). The “far-left” is unhinged. I’m not even going to discuss the difference between the Occupy movement and anarchists, we all know what that is. As is typical, O’Loofah has not one shred of evidence to support what he said, if he did, put on those investigators with charts, letters, emails and whatnot, don’t put on Miss PHD Monica Crowley.

He certainly covered all of his boogeymen last nite. His audience won’t fact-check one single thing he said. Yes, Colmes should have been more forceful. But he is getting paid for what he does by Faux, so that does limit him.

Same old, same old indeed.
mj - the same one commented 2012-05-23 15:50:18 -0400 · Flag
“It is long past time for President Obama to condemn the anarchistic element of the Occupiers, which is now dominant. Instead, the President falls back on ‘protecting freedom of speech’ platitudes. (said with disdain) Sure. Tell that to the Chicago cop who got stabbed, Mr. President.”

In the above passage, replace

- “occupiers” with “teabaggers”
- “Chicago cop” with “Florida teen”
- and “stabbed” with “shot”

and BillO will be correct . . .

.
Lakeview Greg commented 2012-05-23 12:07:42 -0400 · Flag
Tea Party TV
Anne-claire Souza commented 2012-05-23 11:14:21 -0400 · Flag
Same old same old
truman commented 2012-05-23 08:34:09 -0400 · Flag
Crazy conspiracy theories with no factual support that ultimately smear President Obama. Glenn Becktard would be proud of his buddy Bildo.
NewsHound Alex commented 2012-05-23 05:12:49 -0400 · Flag
Crowley is a lying bitch and she knows it. The smirk on her face said it all.
Ellen commented 2012-05-23 03:59:25 -0400 · Flag
Colmes was in a bit of a box, I think. He didn’t have enough info to rebut O’Reilly on the OWS/IPS/SEIU “cabal,” and because he’s on staff at Fox, he couldn’t call out O’Reilly’s “findings” as BS. Colmes is usually the best at finding ways to reframe the debate away from FNC talking points to his own but for some reason he didn’t here. My guess is it was because he was more interested in defending Obama than the OWS “cabal.”
Ellen commented 2012-05-23 03:51:22 -0400 · Flag
Agree!
Kevin Koster commented 2012-05-23 03:41:50 -0400 · Flag
The Colmes/Crowley segment was one of the worst I’ve ever seen. Crowley was given a clear shot to make some very nasty and snide allegations while Colmes wasn’t even afforded the “20 seconds” that O’Reilly offered him before he was cut off by the others.








or sign in with Facebook or email.
Follow @NewsHounds on Twitter
Subscribe with RSS


We’ve updated our Privacy Policy
Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Created with NationBuilder