NewsHounds
We watch Fox so you don't have to!
  • Home
  • About
  • Archives
  • Forum
  • Blogroll
  • Donate
  • Shop
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
Home →

Bill O’Reilly Complains About Racial Innuendo Over Romney’s NAACP Booing, Then Plays His Own Racial Card

Posted by Ellen -7859.80pc on July 13, 2012 · Flag

Bill O’Reilly was up in arms that Nancy Pelosi and an MSNBC commenter accused Mitt Romney of deliberately trying to get booed when he spoke to the NAACP convention earlier this week. Supposedly, it was Romney's secret plan to use his victimhood as a way of boosting his cred to racist conservatives. But instead of trying to disprove it, O'Reilly debated – raged against, really – Hilary Shelton, the Washington Bureau Director of the NAACP. And guess what? O’Reilly suggested that the real racial intolerance was coming from the NAACP.

Speaking of Pelosi’s accusation, O’Reilly said, “In a fair country – that innuendo absolutely unacceptable.”

Shelton said, “You can’t dismiss” the theory. “Quite frankly, the way that Mitt Romney came to the NAACP was clearly not to garner support. If you have a better idea, quite frankly – keep in mind the NAACP’s non-partisan and we always invite candidates from at least both parties… but if you want to garner support, at least meet people where they’re at.”  To illustrate Romney’s lack of outreach, Shelton said many found it “quite offensive” that Romney called the Affordable Care Act “ObamaCare” as well as “the manner in which he presented” his desire to repeal it. “Mr. Romney said he would repeal that to save money but he didn’t talk about what he would replace it with to save lives.” So, Shelton said, you have to wonder why he put himself forth in that way.

O’Reilly interrupted. “I don’t think anyone would object to anyone disagreeing with the governor about the repealing of ObamaCare.” But he went on to complain that John McCain “got jazzed” by the NAACP when he spoke at their convention in 2008.

Shelton disagreed. The record indicates Shelton is correct.  You can read the full transcript or watch the full speech and let me know if I’m wrong. Shelton also noted that George W. Bush spoke when he was a candidate and that neither got treated disrespectfully.

That’s when O’Reilly turned mean. “They got jazzed by your crew and you know it!”

When he was a presidential candidate, Bush 43 spoke to the NAACP in 2000 and seems to have been treated respectfully. He declined to speak to the NAACP in 2004. But he was booed in 2006 (not a year he was running for anything) when he brought up charter schools and the war in Iraq. However, as far as treating Republican candidates goes, Shelton was correct. Adam Serwer, writing in Mother Jones, noted, “Prior to that, you have to go back about twenty years of white guys not getting booed to 1983, when then-Vice President George H.W. Bush was booed because of his defense of the Reagan administration’s civil rights record. Even then, ABC News describes him as being ‘well received’ when he returned as a presidential candidate in 1988.”

It’s understandable and forgiveable that O’Reilly got mixed up but there’s really no excuse for his attacking Shelton as a liar – especially when Shelton was the one telling the truth.“I hope you’ll go back (and check),” Shelton said.

I hope he’s not holding his breath. “I remember covering it,” O’Reilly said, implying that he saw no need.

Ironically, it was O'Reilly now displaying a racial chip on his shoulder. “Mitt Romney gave the same speech that he gives everywhere… Are you gonna sit there and tell me that he should have pandered to your audience and not given that speech?”

“Pandering is not the word,” Shelton said. “You speak to the audience that’s in front of you. …He was not interested in reaching our audience.”"

It's hard to imagine O'Reilly - or even Romney who, by the way, said he expected to get booed - wouldn't know that politicians always, or almost always, tweak their remarks for the particular crowd they're facing. It says a lot about O'Reilly's own racial hostility to insist that Romney treat a crowd of African Americans as if they’re the same as the other audiences at Romney speeches.

Unfortunately, that line of argument was discontinued and the segment devolved further as O’Reilly and Shelton vociferously disagreed over what Romney did or didn’t say about improving education. Once again, O’Reilly was oafish and bullying. “I’m gonna go back 30 seconds and tell the audience that you basically did not tell the truth on this broadcast!” he said accusingly to Shelton. Shelton, on the other hand, remained polite and respectful throughout. Later, as the segment began to close, O’Reilly jabbed his finger and yelled, “You want a politician to pander to your crew! That’s what you want! You don’t want him to tell the truth, you want him to pander… You want him to kiss your butts!”

I don’t know if Romney deliberately got himself booed at the NAACP or was just terribly tone deaf (for the record, I tend to think the latter). But one thing is indisputable: He didn’t do himself any favors with African Americans with his speech to the NAACP and O’Reilly didn’t do him any favors with the black community in this segment, either.

Video available at Mediaite.

Follow @NewsHounds

Follow @NewsHoundEllen


Do you like this post?
Tweet

Showing 16 reactions



    Review the site rules
Joshua Hatheway commented 2012-07-16 15:24:41 -0400 · Flag
@Brian M

Obama has done his share of whining too. All politicians “whine” about the other side. But I won’t stoop to your level and try to figure out who is “whinier”. That’s not how I judge candidates and it’s not helpful to the debate over policies.
Joshua Hatheway commented 2012-07-16 14:54:39 -0400 · Flag
@just Runner— You claim to be Libertarian. I have never heard of “Left Libertarian”. Do you know the definition of Libertarian? I do not know your thoughts on Obamacare, but if you support it you are no Libertarian.
Ellen commented 2012-07-14 02:05:40 -0400 · Flag
Kevin Koster wrote:

I don’t think Romney did it to attract racist white voters, and I don’t believe that’s what Nancy Pelosi was implying in her statement. He did it to try to play his appearance to appeal to two different constituencies. By appearing at the NAACP, he thought he would appeal to independent and undecided voters as being open-minded. By deliberately provoking them with what would obviously be taken as an offensive comment, he thought he would show conservatives that he wasn’t pandering to the NAACP. That isn’t the same thing as getting a white racist vote. It’s a matter of appealing to conservatives who don’t like the NAACP and say things like several Fox commentators did the night prior about the organization. It wasn’t a specifically racist vote Romney was appealing to in his base – it was the specific right wing vote, which is still not convinced that Romney is their guy.

This is totally plausible, maybe the most plausible explanation.
Bob Roberts commented 2012-07-13 18:48:22 -0400 · Flag
Romney raised a wonderful family with good values???? Ask Seamus, his dog, what he thought of Romney’s good values.
Aria Prescott commented 2012-07-13 17:15:32 -0400 · Flag
Diana, you were asked to validate some of your early comments, and your retort was the equivalent of “I don’t have to present my evidence when asked, but you do!”, followed by excessive flaming.

Can you present a factual, sourced argument or not?
Janet Tuhey commented 2012-07-13 17:14:44 -0400 · Flag
Troll Diana did not come here to become better informed. Trying to educate a troll is about as easy as describing color to a blind person.
Joshua Hatheway commented 2012-07-13 14:52:41 -0400 · Flag
-Shelton said many found it “quite offensive” that Romney called the Affordable Care Act “ObamaCare” as well as “the manner in which he presented” his desire to repeal it. -

Why is “Obamacare” offensive? Look at this.

https://store.barackobama.com/featured-15/obamacare-tee.html
Joshua Hatheway commented 2012-07-13 14:45:25 -0400 · Flag
I find it kinda refreshing that he didn’t skirt the issues about a huge campaign promise he knew was unpopular with the crowd to which he was speaking (something most politicians do). If anything, he emboldened that sector of the poulation to vote against him.
Joseph West commented 2012-07-13 14:26:32 -0400 · Flag
I find it amusing that diana, in her first comment, deplores the “left-wing bias” and blasts all the “left’s demonizing,” followed up by attacking the “can’t win with honesty…then tear the other person down” meme before ending her comment by slamming Hillary Clinton—who, as far as I can recall isn’t running for any political office and has pretty much been on the sidelines in terms of this year’s campaign (since she’s pretty much got her hands full as Secretary of State).

Diana, and I say this with all due respect, go look in the mirror before accusing others of any wrongdoing. Then, go f*** yourself with a cactus (though I have a feeling you wouldn’t even feel it).
Thx4 Fish commented 2012-07-13 13:32:14 -0400 · Flag
Its sad to think that in four short years a Republican nominee has gone from making an minimal effort to win over AA voters (McCain), to actively antagonizing them to win over the hard core elements on the other side. I don’t think Romney himself is a hard-core nut case, but if you have to make enemies of your opponents, then you have lost sight of what politics is all about and have no business running for office.
Aria Prescott commented 2012-07-13 12:44:54 -0400 · Flag
Isn’t it funny how right-wingers like Diana, Sam and ol’ banned Bobby love to whine about “proof” and demand it endlessly from others…

But when it’s their turn to pony up, the response every last time is “I don’t have to validate anything- do your own research!”

But I guess I honestly can’t (and shouldn’t) expect more from people who lied that craig, Foley and Sanford were Democrats because there was no way to make them victims when they were caught.
Bob Roberts commented 2012-07-13 12:39:13 -0400 · Flag
Diana, if your “research” material includes Fox, Newsbusters, World Nut Daily and far-right talk radio, I don’t think its going to pass the smell test.
truman commented 2012-07-13 12:26:11 -0400 · Flag
@diana. Since you have already done the research, please enlighten us. Does Mittens wear his magic underwear everywhere or just for special occasions?
truman commented 2012-07-13 09:10:03 -0400 · Flag
The previous NewsHounds blog entry noted that confidence in television news is at an all-time low. Bildo’s blatant bias on full display here is Exhibit A as to why.
Rick Patel commented 2012-07-13 06:54:53 -0400 · Flag
Why does Newshounds habitually prefer banality to brilliance? Bumptious Billo? Who cares? Gov. Sarah Palin went “On the Record” with Greta last night.
Kevin Koster commented 2012-07-13 03:44:33 -0400 · Flag
This is yet another example of the growing panic among the right wing over the Romney candidacy. Now O’Reilly is losing his temper and fudging his facts over something that’s not much to discuss.

Romney can choose which way he wants his embarassing performance to be interpreted. Either he deliberately said something he knew would provoke that audience to have a bad reaction (as he has admitted he did), or he so misunderstood that audience that he thought he could do it with impunity. I personally think it was the former, based on his statements, and based on the immediate right wing reaction that this behavior would give him “street cred” for having stood up to the NAACP. Even Dick Morris was touting that line on Fox the night before. But now O’Reilly wants to walk that back somehow…

I don’t think Romney did it to attract racist white voters, and I don’t believe that’s what Nancy Pelosi was implying in her statement. He did it to try to play his appearance to appeal to two different constituencies. By appearing at the NAACP, he thought he would appeal to independent and undecided voters as being open-minded. By deliberately provoking them with what would obviously be taken as an offensive comment, he thought he would show conservatives that he wasn’t pandering to the NAACP. That isn’t the same thing as getting a white racist vote. It’s a matter of appealing to conservatives who don’t like the NAACP and say things like several Fox commentators did the night prior about the organization. It wasn’t a specifically racist vote Romney was appealing to in his base – it was the specific right wing vote, which is still not convinced that Romney is their guy.

The argument about schools took O’Reilly down another blind alley for him. Romney’s comment about how he would deal with schools was blatant code for throwing education funding into a voucher program, where rich people could be subsidized for putting their kids in private school while poor people could choose between either spending a lot of money on private school past what the voucher would cover, or leaving their kids in the public schools, which would see their funding base gutted even further than what we have seen so far. That’s long been on the right wing wish list, and it hasn’t happened because smart people on the other side have been able to keep the right wingers from getting away with it. This has never been about school choice; it’s a matter of rich people not liking their tax money going to fund schools their kids don’t attend, and wanting to get a little bonus in the form of a voucher.

It’s a sad situation for Romney that the one time he pops up in public recently, he makes a poor showing at the NAACP and embarasses himself. This is not a good omen for the many public appearances and debates he will need to somehow ace in September and October. It’s no wonder that we’re seeing desperate twitters from Rupert Murdoch and increasingly frantic media appearances by people like John Sununu.








or sign in with Facebook or email.
Follow @NewsHounds on Twitter
Subscribe with RSS


We’ve updated our Privacy Policy
Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Created with NationBuilder