At End Of Interview, Dana Perino Tells George W. Bush She’s His ‘Biggest Fan’

Hell, Dana; you didn’t need to say so.

That much was evident when you claimed there were “no terrorist attacks on US soil under George W. Bush” . . .

.

This is the Clarence Thomas who claimed, in that same interview, he’s “not into politics.”

http://thepoliticalcarnival.net/2013/05/03/im-not-into-politics-said-partisan-justice-thomas-black-president-would-be-approved-by-elites-media/

Given that you 1) voted in favor of Citizens United, and 2) are married to the founder-of-a-tea-party group-turned-lobbyist who bragged about all the influence she had, you coulda fooled me . . .

.

To Sean Hannity there’s no event President Obama can’t be impeached for — and the Obama presidency has been “very much in peril” since the day it started . . .

.

@sandman1: “I thought they would have lauded Jay-z as an example of the American dream come true, something about his entrepreneurial spirit at the least.”

No way — for Insanity and his fellow Fauxites, that only matters if you’re a white rightwinger (the Kochsucker Brothers, Sheldon Adelson, Mitt Romney, etc.)

If you’re on the left and you’ve achieved financial success, there has to be a negative reason for it (Jay-Z a “former drug dealer”, George Soros “sent Jews to the death camps [at age 13]”, etc.)

.

Funny how he never cares about the intelligence failures that started an entire war in Iraq or missed a warning about the 9/11 attacks.

Or about the SEVEN US Embassies overseas that were attacked under the Dumbya misAdministration:

http://mediamatters.org/research/2012/09/14/krauthammer-whitewashes-bushs-history-to-bash-o/189890

Hannity was so eager to malign our president, that he actually timed the answers, made large graphics with the times and then howled about their length.

Well now, you have to understand.

To Insanity and his brain-dead audience of droolers, anything over bumper-sticker length is incomprehensible — hence, their fascination with Bushisms like, “Bring ’em on.”

That a US President would answer questions in detail, thoughtfully, and intelligently — and have dark skin, to boot! — is completely foreign to them . . .

.

ET’s replies — and contributions — to the “Wingnut Hall Of Fame Quote Thread” in the Forum, had me cracking up.

She will be missed. RIP. Thoughts and prayers for her family.

.

@ Joseph Baloney: “But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the White race . . .”

There’s a “genocide” against the white race? Who knew??

“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.”

No, Joe Blow Hard — it’s a code for “anti-idiot”.

And, the next time you copy and past from NorthWestFront, at least have the decency to cite your source.

Flagged.

.

Fox To Glenn Beck: You Left To Save Your Ass, Not Your Soul

And this comes in the wake of a Twit(ter) fight between The Combover and Ms. Maglalang:

http://www.newshounds.us/the_donald_trump_v_michelle_malkin_twitter_war_03222013

I’m gonna go pop some popcorn . . .

.

This morning, they brought on the right wing, Republican actor Robert Davi who proffered his view that political correctness is squelching our free speech and that things were so much better in the good old days of racial slurs, ethnic jokes, and fine family entertainment like “Amos & Andy,” a show with African-American actors who played to black stereotypes.

Earth to Davi and other rightwingnut neoKKKon repubs (oops, I called them two names!):

Much of the “concern” over perceived “political correctness” that I hear, seems to be nothing more than rightwingers upset over the fact that they cannot freely use the N-word in general, and towards the President in particular.

Lemme let you in on a ’lil secret:

Contrary to your constant braying, your free speech has NOT been taken. You are ACTUALLY FREE to call someone else whatever derogatory name you want, including the N-word.

You just have to be willing to accept whatever response, and whatever consequences, follow as a result.

You can do that, can’t you? Think of it as some of that “personal responsibility” you always lay claim to being the party of.

As for precisely what form that response/consequences takes, I cannot speak for ALL of my fellow African Americans, but I will say this: the response will vary, depending on who you say the N-word to, and where you are when you say it.

If you choose to call President Obama a N*gg*r to his face — presuming you got close enough to do so — I doubt a response would even come from him, he’d simply defer the response to the Secret Service Agents guarding him.

Should you direct that racial slur to, say, certain denizens of South-Central LA, Chicago’s South Side, or Buffalo’s East Side, I daresay they may respond more directly.

And should you use it on me, depending on my particular mood, I may respond in kind, with a derisive laugh, more “directly”, or not at all.

The choice is yours . . .

.

Lady, you shouldn’t be allowed here.

We don’t want you here. We should not be required to breathe the same air as you.

We should not be required to suffer the indignity of your presence.

That’s funny, Jeannie.

I tend to feel the same way about a certain Westchester County matron/failed US Senate candidate from NY/failed candidate for NY State Atty. Gen. . . . one who committed a few Palin-esque gaffes during her Senate run (like thinking New York State shares a border with Ohio, or fumbling after one of the pages to a prepared speech was missing), and dropping out of BOTH races when questions about your ex-husband’s tax fraud and alleged mob connections became too uncomfortable.

The only difference is, I’m not willing to trash the US Constitution in order to do so.

.