NewsHounds
We watch Fox so you don't have to!
  • Home
  • About
  • Naughty Corner
  • Forum
  • Archives
  • Blogroll
  • Donate
  • Shop
  • Contact
Home →

Hannity Uses Chicago's Epidemic Of Violence To Hate Monger Against Louis Farrakhan Again

Posted by Ellen -391.20pc on July 30, 2012 · Flag

Sean Hannity has found another excuse to hate monger about his uber black boogeyman, Louis Farrakhan. This time, Hannity feigned an interest in Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel's initiative to address a horrific epidemic of violence in the inner city. But Hannity's only real interest in the topic was in Emanuel's decision to allow “racist and anti-Semitic” Farrakhan to play a role in some kind of all-hands-on-deck approach - which Hannity was so obsessed with, you'd think Farrakhan was masterminding the whole thing.  I'm not here to defend Farrakhan in any way. But when you consider Hannity's obsession with Farrakhan, his own association with bigots, his promotion of racially-tinged attacks on President Obama the only fact really proven in the discussion was that Hannity's race baiting is alive, well and still completely acceptable on Fox News.

Hannity began the segment, which aired last Thursday (7/26/12), by “asking,” “Why would the mayor want any help from this man when it comes to anything? Now this is a man who has made more racist and anti-Semitic comments than anyone I can think of. But apparently Deadfish (Hannity’s pet name for Emanuel), well, he disagrees with me.”

It’s funny how Hannity is so disturbed by Farrakhan’s racism yet has no problem when his pal Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson says things like, “Most blacks” in Tennessee are “so racist.” And the fact that Peterson “thanks God for slavery” has not prevented Hannity from endorsing Peterson’s charity and sitting on its advisory board.

The designated African American black-attacker for the segment was conservative Erik Rush. He wasted no time before he went after the usual Fox News scapegoat, saying that problems in Chicago are “a byproduct of liberal policies.”

For once, Hannity forwent attacking liberals – so eager was he to attack Farrakhan. Hannity ignored what Rush said in order to play some inflammatory recording of Farrakhan.

The other guest, Alexis McGill Johnson tried to talk about the crisis in black America. But Hannity cut her off in favor of focusing on Farrakhan: “We know there's a crisis, is that the right man to go to? ...Is that the guy that belongs helping? …Is he an anti-Semite? Is he or is he not?”

Rush got with the program. “I can't help but wonder if Rahm Emanuel would have welcomed the Ku Klux Klan in.” Before he repeated, “This kind of social and economic squalor is directly traceable” to liberal policies.

Hannity said, “That's what's causing black on black violence?” The note of hope in his voice was unmistakeable.

 


Do you like this post?
Tweet
submit to reddit

Showing 48 reactions



    Review the site rules
Snaps Bacula commented 2012-08-21 14:57:38 -0400 · Flag
Oh, btw, the answer to “…what’s causing black on black violence?” is simple. It’s not YT. It is black recidivist cretins. We are all the sum total of our decisions. Try putting some thought into yours.
Snaps Bacula commented 2012-08-21 13:46:28 -0400 · Flag
Look at the village idiots playing their little violins. Alexis McGill Johnson is a typical moonbat who refuses to answer direct questions. Black on non-black mobbing (Knockout Game, Thrill Killings, lighting ppl on fire, etc) has risen to such highs that you puppets have no choice but to face it. To hell with you race-pimps & black foot soldiers.
Joshua Hatheway commented 2012-08-07 07:50:05 -0400 · Flag
I will let that comment stand as proof of one of my earlier comments… and proof that you hate people with downs syndrome. (I dont know you, but using your logic I can make that deduction.)
Chris commented 2012-08-02 12:31:09 -0400 · Flag
Are you a retard, Josh? Don’t answer, that’s a rhetorical question.

This is your quote: “I am not “pro-gay”. I do not want everybody to be gay. I accept people for who they are, not what they do in their bedroom.”

Translation, you claim to accept gay people for who they are, except for doing the very thing that defines them as gay. What other examples are there besides sex that differentiates gays from straight people?

No matter how hard you try and spin it, the words you spouted DO make you a homophobe. Case closed. I win, you lose, deal with it loser. Buh-byeee.
Joshua Hatheway commented 2012-08-02 09:29:35 -0400 · Flag
ho·mo·pho·bi·a
   [hoh-muh-foh-bee-uh]

noun
unreasoning fear of or antipathy toward homosexuals and homosexuality.

If you think I fit this definition. Let me hear your arguments.
Joshua Hatheway commented 2012-08-02 08:37:59 -0400 · Flag
Wtf? I just said I do not have a problem with that.
Chris commented 2012-08-01 21:16:33 -0400 · Flag
If you say you accept people for who they are Josh, then you really shouldn’t have a problem with what gays, like your brother, do in their bedrooms. Yet you say otherwise.

Like it or not, you really do fit the mold of a homophobe. Do get over yourself, dopey.
Joshua Hatheway commented 2012-08-01 20:46:01 -0400 · Flag
@ Truman You may not care, but if I may beg your pardon, I was accused of being a homophobe.
Joshua Hatheway commented 2012-08-01 20:43:05 -0400 · Flag
It’s not going out of my way to come here for entertainment. Just a few clicks. And I bet you believe this place is a bastian for unbiased reporting.

Also, I am not “pro-gay”. I do not want everybody to be gay. I accept people for who they are, not what they do in their bedroom.

You can think what you want, but I do not buy cable. You should try getting rid of yours. Too much tv rots the brain. Especially watching shows you you don’t like. Watcha think?
truman commented 2012-08-01 20:21:27 -0400 · Flag
@joshua. too much personal information. we really don’t care.
Chris commented 2012-08-01 18:53:52 -0400 · Flag
For someone who claims they’re pro-gay and doesn’t watch Fox News, you sure go out of your way to defend that lying, hate filled propoganda outfit, and their star liar Sean Hannity, dontcha Josh?
Joshua Hatheway commented 2012-08-01 16:40:07 -0400 · Flag
@truman Thank you for your sophomoric response. It was quite entertaining. Let’s get a couple things straight.
1. My brother is gay and I love him.
2. I have gay friends, and yes I even let them into my home.
3. It is ironic you use the “homophobe” smear tactic on a thread involving Louis Farrakhan who IS a homophobe.
4. I do not watch Fox News as I do not pay for cable.

I will say this: I know Fox News is successful and that has people here angry. So angry they claim to watch shows they hate 24 hours a day. It is fun to come here sometimes to see what has their panties all bunched up.
Camisha Muhammad commented 2012-08-01 15:11:04 -0400 · Flag
It was absolutely ridiculous. He didn’t want to talk about a solution (which he doesn’t have b/c he is not willing to get in the streets himself) he just wanted to go after Farrakhan. He is obsessed with Farrakhan b/c even after all the misrepresentation, the people still love him and can’t deny the good that the Nation does!
truman commented 2012-08-01 13:43:11 -0400 · Flag
Pablo & Joshua sitting in a tree…
(the rest of this verse has been deleted so as not to incite the homophobes in the Fux Nation).
Headly Westerfield commented 2012-07-31 22:18:43 -0400 · Flag
Hey well, I’m a friendly stranger in a black Sedan.

And I still have a blog: http://notnowsilly.blogspot.com/

Please help me save Miami’s historic E.W.F. Stirrup House.
Bob Roberts commented 2012-07-31 22:01:00 -0400 · Flag
You just gotta love the defenders of Klannity. Do they actually listen, I mean listen, to what comes out of his mouth. Defend his relationship with Hal Turner, defend his behavior during the Abner Louima case, defend his “Freedom Concert” scam where more money was spend on postage and Oliver North’s daughter’s salary then on the children of the vets he was “supposed” to be “helping” further their education and get back to me. And just because Klannity invites Jesse Lee Peterson on every now and then doesn’t mean he has problem with people of a darker persuasion than himself. He didn’t earn the K for Klannity for no reason at all.
Joshua Hatheway commented 2012-07-31 21:09:38 -0400 · Flag
OK, back on topic. “uber black boogeyman” hmmmm, as much as Hannity doesn’t like Farrakhan, I don’t think he has ever used such language to describe him. It’s kinda weird that the author of this piece thought of those words to do so.
vermont dave commented 2012-07-31 20:47:51 -0400 · Flag
Mr. mlp, this is in b flat.
(ahem)
Harumph!
ps.
they ain’t, but they are……go figure.
Pablo Juarez commented 2012-07-31 20:47:51 -0400 · Flag
Joshua, if you want a good website for seeing the news…check out vistarepublic.com
Pablo Juarez commented 2012-07-31 20:45:16 -0400 · Flag
If mlp believes we are the same person, then I ask how pathetic is mlp to maintain 10+ user id’s for this site…
1  2  3  Next →
blog advertising is good for you






or sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Subscribe with RSS

Make Custom Gifts at CafePress


Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Created with NationBuilder