On The O’Reilly Factor yesterday, Bill O’Reilly discussed the “competing dog atrocities” of Mitt Romney and Barack Obama. Predictably, Obama’s was ruled the worst. Why? Because Gutfeld said that since dogs love to stick their heads out the windows of cars, “they would love to ride on top of a car in a nice, safe little compartment.”
Gutfeld said:
Dogs love to stick their heads out the windows of cars. They would love to ride on top of a car in a nice, safe little compartment. So-called pet advocates don’t understand the mindset of animals. Animals love the wind. They don’t like to be eaten.
Do you like this post?
Kent Brockman commented
2012-04-30 23:12:51 -0400
· Flag
Romney Sez
Whaahoooo! Doggy got a Airstream!
Whaahoooo! Doggy got a Airstream!
mj - the same one commented
2012-04-28 17:54:55 -0400
· Flag
@Visitor55:
“I love watching you ignorant neocons try to spin your hypocrisy. First you hate Rmoney, now youâre trying to convince everyone that you love him. Itâs 2008 & McDepends all over again. Keep it up jackass.”
Didn’t we see this coming?
With all the money the Kochsucker brothers are spending to bankroll the GOP, it only makes sense they’d spend it on a fellow one percenter like Mittens — that’s why Frothy and Newt dropped out; Paul will eventually get the message.
If you think it’s an instant replay of 2008 now, just wait’ll Mittens picks Nikki Haley as his running mate. :)
.
“I love watching you ignorant neocons try to spin your hypocrisy. First you hate Rmoney, now youâre trying to convince everyone that you love him. Itâs 2008 & McDepends all over again. Keep it up jackass.”
Didn’t we see this coming?
With all the money the Kochsucker brothers are spending to bankroll the GOP, it only makes sense they’d spend it on a fellow one percenter like Mittens — that’s why Frothy and Newt dropped out; Paul will eventually get the message.
If you think it’s an instant replay of 2008 now, just wait’ll Mittens picks Nikki Haley as his running mate. :)
.
Aria Prescott commented
2012-04-28 17:31:36 -0400
· Flag
Visitor: If Romney has the mindset of a 10 year-old, that that would explain a lot about why Fox News looks up to him. Most 5 year-olds think 10 year-olds know everything.
mj - the same one commented
2012-04-28 16:55:24 -0400
· Flag
So-called pet advocates donât understand the mindset of animals.
Nice to know that Gutfilled has the same mindset as a canine quadruped that has the approximate IQ of a five-year-old child . . .
.
Nice to know that Gutfilled has the same mindset as a canine quadruped that has the approximate IQ of a five-year-old child . . .
.
NewsHound Alex commented
2012-04-28 16:25:16 -0400
· Flag
Dogs like to be with their humans. They don’t like being stuck away from the camaraderie and warmth. Mitt is Mean. Remember Crategate!
I’d rather see Gutffeld strapped to the top of a car. My dogs have more class and compassion than he has.
I’d rather see Gutffeld strapped to the top of a car. My dogs have more class and compassion than he has.
Joseph West commented
2012-04-28 14:38:36 -0400
· Flag
The World According to Gutfeld: “So-called pet advocates donât understand the mindset of animals. Animals love the wind. They donât like to be eaten.”
Well, I’d certainly have to agree with that last sentence. Now, I just need to know one little thing: Is Gutfeld a vegetarian or an animal rights advocate? If not, his statement is just stupid. (I’d say “hypocritical,” but saying hypocritical things is part and parcel of being a FoxNoise host or contributor.)
I’d also like to know Gutfeld’s opinion on using “pets” as lab experiments. Granted, labs don’t usually use actual pets, but they’ve been known to use dogs and cats (typically strays) for all kinds of “research.” I’m of the opinion that those animals (even the “non-pet” types—like monkeys and mice) aren’t fond of having chemicals injected into them.
Well, I’d certainly have to agree with that last sentence. Now, I just need to know one little thing: Is Gutfeld a vegetarian or an animal rights advocate? If not, his statement is just stupid. (I’d say “hypocritical,” but saying hypocritical things is part and parcel of being a FoxNoise host or contributor.)
I’d also like to know Gutfeld’s opinion on using “pets” as lab experiments. Granted, labs don’t usually use actual pets, but they’ve been known to use dogs and cats (typically strays) for all kinds of “research.” I’m of the opinion that those animals (even the “non-pet” types—like monkeys and mice) aren’t fond of having chemicals injected into them.
Kevin Koster commented
2012-04-28 13:21:50 -0400
· Flag
This has been a particularly slimey attack route, and that’s saying something.
Let’s see if we can figure out the difference here: Obama as a ten year old boy was given various cooked meats by his stepfather and told what they were as part of his life experience. He mentions this in his 1995 book as a part of the range of things that he did in Indonesia before moving back to the US for a completely different set of life experiences. He did not go attack and kill a dog. He did not see what was done to the dog. He was presented food by his stepfather and he ate it. He doesn’t regret the experience because it’s part of a ten year old learning about the world.
Romney on the other hand was an adult and a parent of several children the day he strapped his dog’s travel cage to the roof of his car. And clearly the dog was not enjoying the ride. It’s possible, to be honest, that the dog might have been sick inside the car had he done the humane thing – that happens when you have a dog. (This is the part that part that people haven’t really asked about.) But the point of the story is that it is yet another confirmation of Romney’s remoteness and his inability to connect with people (or pets) on an everyday, human level.
Gutfield’s response to this, as was Hannity’s, is breathtaking in its sheer contempt for President Obama and in the desperation that Fox News is beginning to show about this election.
Let’s see if we can figure out the difference here: Obama as a ten year old boy was given various cooked meats by his stepfather and told what they were as part of his life experience. He mentions this in his 1995 book as a part of the range of things that he did in Indonesia before moving back to the US for a completely different set of life experiences. He did not go attack and kill a dog. He did not see what was done to the dog. He was presented food by his stepfather and he ate it. He doesn’t regret the experience because it’s part of a ten year old learning about the world.
Romney on the other hand was an adult and a parent of several children the day he strapped his dog’s travel cage to the roof of his car. And clearly the dog was not enjoying the ride. It’s possible, to be honest, that the dog might have been sick inside the car had he done the humane thing – that happens when you have a dog. (This is the part that part that people haven’t really asked about.) But the point of the story is that it is yet another confirmation of Romney’s remoteness and his inability to connect with people (or pets) on an everyday, human level.
Gutfield’s response to this, as was Hannity’s, is breathtaking in its sheer contempt for President Obama and in the desperation that Fox News is beginning to show about this election.
doors17 commented
2012-04-28 11:26:07 -0400
· Flag
Dogs Against Romney
http://www.dogsagainstromney.com/
http://www.dogsagainstromney.com/
NewsHounds
posted
about Greg Gutfeld Decides Mitt Romney’s Dog Loved Riding On The Top Of His Car
on NewsHounds' Facebook page
2012-04-28 11:20:28 -0400
"Animals love the wind," Gutfeld says.