Fox News' Todd Starnes greeted the news of President Obama's re-election with a real show of patriotism: Calling for impeachment proceedings.
Starnes tweeted last night:
H/T Media Matters
Those Fox Newsies sure have a unique way of showing their love for America, eh?
Do you like this post?
Ray Michaels commented
2012-11-08 13:31:46 -0500
· Flag
Just thught of something else. If Hannity’s theory of the welfare state made the President win becasue they have grown so large and powerful then ergo he should be telling his conservatives to abandon all hopes of ever wining for thier side again! What an idtiot becaue he can’t even follow hos own assinine sylogisms out to their logical conclusion!
Bemused commented
2012-11-08 09:34:10 -0500
· Flag
@Ray Michaels. Agree fully with everything you wrote. Wish only that I were so concise!
I’m particularly gratified that so much money came to naught because the majority of voters felt that what they were being fed by the Romney campaign was BS not fillet steak. No way to believe that a person capable of changing opinions so easily would even want to keep any promises?
I’m particularly gratified that so much money came to naught because the majority of voters felt that what they were being fed by the Romney campaign was BS not fillet steak. No way to believe that a person capable of changing opinions so easily would even want to keep any promises?
Ray Michaels commented
2012-11-08 08:07:58 -0500
· Flag
Oh Hannity claims that main stream media helped Obama win whereas the 301 million that Karl spent on hate ads failed. Also I wonder if all the air time FOX gave for online “interviews” with Romney and Ryan and their spokespersons was “LEGAL” and paid for? Hope that gets investigated and if they did it for free maybe they will lose their licnese! :-)
Ray Michaels commented
2012-11-08 08:01:22 -0500
· Flag
Hannity on FOX says Obama won becasue the liberal welfare crowd has greatly incerased and elected him. Now what a stupid SOUR GRAPES message to come up with! SOS on FOX! He also accused the President of using character destruction on Romney. He should know all about that topic since he and his FOXY friends have done exactly that for the past four years to the Preident ONLY it did not work! Amazing how they can act so SELF-RIGHTEOUS while disucssing these things LIKE their skirts all clean and above such stuff!
Bemused commented
2012-11-08 04:19:24 -0500
· Flag
When GWB lost the popular vote in 2000, the republicans claimed he had a full mandate. Now that BHO has won the popular vote (by 2 million circa) they are saying he doesn’t have a mandate? They must really think their voters are stu—— Ooops. My Pollyanna side keeps forgetting.
The republicans are behaving like that kid I used to see on the Sunday comics page: you know, the one nobody likes and who’s allowed to play with the others only because he’s got the only ball on the block. The morale of those comic strips was always that the other kids should not allow themselves to be bullied. Even then, I used to think that belonged to the category of “easier said than done”. In fact, that’s what happened during the last two years in Congress during which the republicans focused mainly on making Obama a one-term president (so noble of them, sheeeesh).
From what I’m hearing, the Republicans have no intention at all of working with the Democrats during this second term, even though half the electors voted for the other set of principles. It’s side-splittingly funny to hear the republicans talk about “improving their ground game” to convince new categories to vote for them. Hold on a minute, aren’t the electees supposed to “represent” the electors? Way they’re talking, it’s the other way round and they’re agonna refuse to tango.
The founding fathers worked hard to come up with a system that would oblige the people’s representatives to work together and prevent any one side from running the whole show for very long. The republicans (small letter intended) are un-American for refusing to play the game according to the rules.
The republicans are behaving like that kid I used to see on the Sunday comics page: you know, the one nobody likes and who’s allowed to play with the others only because he’s got the only ball on the block. The morale of those comic strips was always that the other kids should not allow themselves to be bullied. Even then, I used to think that belonged to the category of “easier said than done”. In fact, that’s what happened during the last two years in Congress during which the republicans focused mainly on making Obama a one-term president (so noble of them, sheeeesh).
From what I’m hearing, the Republicans have no intention at all of working with the Democrats during this second term, even though half the electors voted for the other set of principles. It’s side-splittingly funny to hear the republicans talk about “improving their ground game” to convince new categories to vote for them. Hold on a minute, aren’t the electees supposed to “represent” the electors? Way they’re talking, it’s the other way round and they’re agonna refuse to tango.
The founding fathers worked hard to come up with a system that would oblige the people’s representatives to work together and prevent any one side from running the whole show for very long. The republicans (small letter intended) are un-American for refusing to play the game according to the rules.
Kent Brockman commented
2012-11-07 19:05:29 -0500
· Flag
Fox Newâs Todd Starnes Says âSouth Parkâ Should Be Federally Investigated
Has Todd finished that very serious work on Soth Park yet? No? Looks like he’s a quitter like Palin.
Has Todd finished that very serious work on Soth Park yet? No? Looks like he’s a quitter like Palin.
Aria Prescott commented
2012-11-07 18:57:57 -0500
· Flag
MM, Fox News don’t care- Their timeline has been discredited by American media, international media, security officials in both the US and Libya, members of their on-air staff, and Condi Rice told one of their hosts to their face to knock off their lying.
They want Benghazi to be their revenge for truthers, but I’m sorry- not happening. When their best case is saying that Obama ignored the possibility of terrorists because he used the words “act of terror” instead of “Al QUEDA! GET YER GUNS!”… they’ve already failed.
And they don’t have Breitbart to make convincing fakes for them anymore, so unless his replacement is good, this will just get sadder and sadder.
They want Benghazi to be their revenge for truthers, but I’m sorry- not happening. When their best case is saying that Obama ignored the possibility of terrorists because he used the words “act of terror” instead of “Al QUEDA! GET YER GUNS!”… they’ve already failed.
And they don’t have Breitbart to make convincing fakes for them anymore, so unless his replacement is good, this will just get sadder and sadder.
mj - the same one commented
2012-11-07 17:55:28 -0500
· Flag
3000 Americans die in 9/11 attacks after repeated warnings: “there were no terrorist attacks on US soil under Bush,” and Pelosi says impeachment is “off the table” . . .
Four Americans die in Benghazi attacks after little to no warning: “IMPEACH!!”
More proof of the Fox/reality disconnect.
.
Four Americans die in Benghazi attacks after little to no warning: “IMPEACH!!”
More proof of the Fox/reality disconnect.
.