NewsHounds
We watch Fox so you don't have to!
  • Home
  • About
  • Naughty Corner
  • Forum
  • Archives
  • Blogroll
  • Donate
  • Shop
  • Contact
Home →

Bill O’Reilly Complains About Racial Innuendo Over Romney’s NAACP Booing, Then Plays His Own Racial Card

Posted by Ellen -456.60pc on July 13, 2012 · Flag

Bill O’Reilly was up in arms that Nancy Pelosi and an MSNBC commenter accused Mitt Romney of deliberately trying to get booed when he spoke to the NAACP convention earlier this week. Supposedly, it was Romney's secret plan to use his victimhood as a way of boosting his cred to racist conservatives. But instead of trying to disprove it, O'Reilly debated – raged against, really – Hilary Shelton, the Washington Bureau Director of the NAACP. And guess what? O’Reilly suggested that the real racial intolerance was coming from the NAACP.

Speaking of Pelosi’s accusation, O’Reilly said, “In a fair country – that innuendo absolutely unacceptable.”

Shelton said, “You can’t dismiss” the theory. “Quite frankly, the way that Mitt Romney came to the NAACP was clearly not to garner support. If you have a better idea, quite frankly – keep in mind the NAACP’s non-partisan and we always invite candidates from at least both parties… but if you want to garner support, at least meet people where they’re at.”  To illustrate Romney’s lack of outreach, Shelton said many found it “quite offensive” that Romney called the Affordable Care Act “ObamaCare” as well as “the manner in which he presented” his desire to repeal it. “Mr. Romney said he would repeal that to save money but he didn’t talk about what he would replace it with to save lives.” So, Shelton said, you have to wonder why he put himself forth in that way.

O’Reilly interrupted. “I don’t think anyone would object to anyone disagreeing with the governor about the repealing of ObamaCare.” But he went on to complain that John McCain “got jazzed” by the NAACP when he spoke at their convention in 2008.

Shelton disagreed. The record indicates Shelton is correct.  You can read the full transcript or watch the full speech and let me know if I’m wrong. Shelton also noted that George W. Bush spoke when he was a candidate and that neither got treated disrespectfully.

That’s when O’Reilly turned mean. “They got jazzed by your crew and you know it!”

When he was a presidential candidate, Bush 43 spoke to the NAACP in 2000 and seems to have been treated respectfully. He declined to speak to the NAACP in 2004. But he was booed in 2006 (not a year he was running for anything) when he brought up charter schools and the war in Iraq. However, as far as treating Republican candidates goes, Shelton was correct. Adam Serwer, writing in Mother Jones, noted, “Prior to that, you have to go back about twenty years of white guys not getting booed to 1983, when then-Vice President George H.W. Bush was booed because of his defense of the Reagan administration’s civil rights record. Even then, ABC News describes him as being ‘well received’ when he returned as a presidential candidate in 1988.”

It’s understandable and forgiveable that O’Reilly got mixed up but there’s really no excuse for his attacking Shelton as a liar – especially when Shelton was the one telling the truth.“I hope you’ll go back (and check),” Shelton said.

I hope he’s not holding his breath. “I remember covering it,” O’Reilly said, implying that he saw no need.

Ironically, it was O'Reilly now displaying a racial chip on his shoulder. “Mitt Romney gave the same speech that he gives everywhere… Are you gonna sit there and tell me that he should have pandered to your audience and not given that speech?”

“Pandering is not the word,” Shelton said. “You speak to the audience that’s in front of you. …He was not interested in reaching our audience.”"

It's hard to imagine O'Reilly - or even Romney who, by the way, said he expected to get booed - wouldn't know that politicians always, or almost always, tweak their remarks for the particular crowd they're facing. It says a lot about O'Reilly's own racial hostility to insist that Romney treat a crowd of African Americans as if they’re the same as the other audiences at Romney speeches.

Unfortunately, that line of argument was discontinued and the segment devolved further as O’Reilly and Shelton vociferously disagreed over what Romney did or didn’t say about improving education. Once again, O’Reilly was oafish and bullying. “I’m gonna go back 30 seconds and tell the audience that you basically did not tell the truth on this broadcast!” he said accusingly to Shelton. Shelton, on the other hand, remained polite and respectful throughout. Later, as the segment began to close, O’Reilly jabbed his finger and yelled, “You want a politician to pander to your crew! That’s what you want! You don’t want him to tell the truth, you want him to pander… You want him to kiss your butts!”

I don’t know if Romney deliberately got himself booed at the NAACP or was just terribly tone deaf (for the record, I tend to think the latter). But one thing is indisputable: He didn’t do himself any favors with African Americans with his speech to the NAACP and O’Reilly didn’t do him any favors with the black community in this segment, either.

 


Do you like this post?
Tweet
submit to reddit

Showing 44 reactions



    Review the site rules
just Runner commented 2012-07-16 16:21:27 -0400 · Flag
@diana kunselman, You speak of your states fiscal state. That’s nice. What did the last GOP President do for this country? OH! Right, he and the GOP Congress put us on track to fail. Good thing they lined their pockets though. The only thing you seem to be good at is name calling. I thought maybe you were a reasonable person, who was lambasted on your first post. I was wrong. Move to the next bridge, troll. I am finished feeding you.
just Runner commented 2012-07-16 15:39:02 -0400 · Flag
@Joshua Hatheway, Here take the test: http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz/
It used to say Libertarian Left. Now it breaks it down differently. I fail to see what my opinion of the ACA is to the relevance of this thread, but here it goes. In a perfect world I am against anything that makes a larger federal government. Seeing as this is FAR from a perfect world, let alone country. We are what 27th in mathematics in the world? Bah! My family pays out the nose for insurance. At the moment, I am the only bread winner in my family. My wife starts a bar tending on Monday. The 80/20 rule just sent us a life life from my wife’s insurance that really saved our bacon. First, am I safe to assume that you are against every motorist have mandatory vehicle insurance? So, let me ask you, do you like the idea of being hit by a broke fool with no license just out for a joy ride; possibly killing you or a loved one with no one to pay for it but you, or your surviving family?
diana kunselman commented 2012-07-16 15:35:57 -0400 · Flag
Libertarian Left? Sounds like a mongrel breed to me, someone who is really confused about their identity. @ Brian M, you don’t even have the guts to put your own name. Your Boy is really spouting off today about business owners, should really help him. Who is the whiner here and how old are you? Are you using the laptop your daddy bought you, because you have never held a real job? Just so you know, our state has a surplus because we have a Republican running it…IT WAS IN THE RED WHEN A DEMOCRAT WAS IN POWER. THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY HAS BEEN HIJACTED BY COMMUNISTS. MY FAVORITE PRESIDENT WAS JOHN F. KENNEDY. There has not been a decent democrat since. The couch is waiting, and so is the doctor. This is a capitalist country NOT SOCIALIST, and if you don’t like it leave.
Joshua Hatheway commented 2012-07-16 15:24:41 -0400 · Flag
@Brian M

Obama has done his share of whining too. All politicians “whine” about the other side. But I won’t stoop to your level and try to figure out who is “whinier”. That’s not how I judge candidates and it’s not helpful to the debate over policies.
Brian M commented 2012-07-16 15:00:24 -0400 · Flag
diana kunselman: “I’M LEAVING, YOU MADE WHAT I THOUGHT WAS A SUREFIRE OBJECTIVE SOURCE LOOK BIASED WAAAA!”

Romney: A whiney candidate for whiney whiners.
Joshua Hatheway commented 2012-07-16 14:54:39 -0400 · Flag
@just Runner— You claim to be Libertarian. I have never heard of “Left Libertarian”. Do you know the definition of Libertarian? I do not know your thoughts on Obamacare, but if you support it you are no Libertarian.
just Runner commented 2012-07-16 14:48:21 -0400 · Flag
@diana, Ahahahahaha! You nothing about me. You assume I’m Left? You got it partially correct. I am Left, LIBERTARIAN LEFT. You fail to post links for anything you have typed in this thread. Why should anyone that replies to you( or that has been berated by you) post anything? Here you go: http://factcheck.org/hot-topics/
diana kunselman commented 2012-07-16 14:28:27 -0400 · Flag
@Just Runner, just where do you get your information? You seem to know all of the answers. So your “sources” are 100% correct and mine are not? So typical left, they always “know” so much more than anyone? They sure know how to spend other peoples money. I do not need to go to Fact Check.org to verify that. They also think "they " know what is best for the individual. Now your Man is claiming “If you have a business,you are not the one responsible for starting it, the government is.” I will make no more posts on this thread. The left nauseates me. WHO ARE THE REAL SHEEP HERE?
just Runner commented 2012-07-16 13:04:38 -0400 · Flag
@diana, By “fact Check” do you mean factcheck.org? Because it was founded by Walter H. Annenberg. Who was a conservative. He died in 2002. There about’s the Annenberg Public Policy Center became more liberal. Now it appears they are returning to their conservative roots. So, yeah, just because someone writes something on their website, doesn’t make it necessarily true.
diana kunselman commented 2012-07-16 09:36:50 -0400 · Flag
Has anyone on this thread heard of “fact Check”? The Boston Globe was just plain wrong. I suppose that site is also Right-winged, just because it does not agree with the liberals. THAT IS WHERE I GET MY INF, NOT FOX. Obama has misled this country from the get go. Solyndra was started by Bush but was also stopped by Bush. Also the electric car IS NOT SELLING..how does that work for ya’. They had to up the rebate to 10,000. Bringing Romney’s dog into this is just plain ignorant, has nothing to do with his character. He took no salary as Governor, no salary for the olympics, and gave his inheritance to the church. he was not involved in outsourcing of any jobs at Bain(again go to fact check). We have one of the worst POS in the history of spending and bankrupting the country. If you will also note that the republican run states are just now showing their budgets are balancing. Democratic states are going broke.
Ellen commented 2012-07-14 02:05:40 -0400 · Flag
Kevin Koster wrote:

I don’t think Romney did it to attract racist white voters, and I don’t believe that’s what Nancy Pelosi was implying in her statement. He did it to try to play his appearance to appeal to two different constituencies. By appearing at the NAACP, he thought he would appeal to independent and undecided voters as being open-minded. By deliberately provoking them with what would obviously be taken as an offensive comment, he thought he would show conservatives that he wasn’t pandering to the NAACP. That isn’t the same thing as getting a white racist vote. It’s a matter of appealing to conservatives who don’t like the NAACP and say things like several Fox commentators did the night prior about the organization. It wasn’t a specifically racist vote Romney was appealing to in his base – it was the specific right wing vote, which is still not convinced that Romney is their guy.

This is totally plausible, maybe the most plausible explanation.
patrick tolle commented 2012-07-13 19:00:17 -0400 · Flag
@ Diana- Hard to deal with someone who’d call other people dumb and have to do it in ALL CAPS but who apparently does not realize the Solyndra loan process was initiated by the Bush administration. The stimulus money evidently got far enough for governors like Piyush Jindal and others who opposed it to have oversized checks created with their names on the signature line like it was their idea and money funding the projects they were touting. Not that this will mean anything who thinks some offhand remark about electric cars is cutting but the winner of this years 24 hours of LeMans( you do know what that is ,don’t you) was a hybrid automobile. Have fun driving your horse and buggy because that’s about where winger thought leaves off.
Bob Roberts commented 2012-07-13 18:48:22 -0400 · Flag
Romney raised a wonderful family with good values???? Ask Seamus, his dog, what he thought of Romney’s good values.
patrick tolle commented 2012-07-13 18:43:09 -0400 · Flag
I’m sure most people here, with the exception of the new wingers, realize their reaction and that of Fux noise is a defense mechanism both against any criticism of the Mittster and against their own demoralization and disappointment that after having gone through that degrading,demeaning process for the second time in four years they’ve nominated another loser a quivering bowl of blancmange. “Demonization” is the winger equivalent of the race card they’re always accusing the left of showing. Fux, and their followers, took their marching orders lined up behind the Mittster and now can’t express their dejection in any other way than to try to create some impression of foul play. If they had anything it would be on the table,but their inability or unwillingness to be specific in their assertions-a typically Fux tactic- proves the intellectual bankruptcy and dishonesty that is their hallmark. I expect nothing more from them.
Brian M commented 2012-07-13 17:57:08 -0400 · Flag
Yea, I’m still waiting to see what “lies” are being spread about Romney. This week’s news cycle is not boding well for him, at all. Between the NAACP mess and the revelation that he lied (yet again) about his record at Bain, he’s going to have to do some MAJOR praying to his cult god this weekend.
Aria Prescott commented 2012-07-13 17:15:32 -0400 · Flag
Diana, you were asked to validate some of your early comments, and your retort was the equivalent of “I don’t have to present my evidence when asked, but you do!”, followed by excessive flaming.

Can you present a factual, sourced argument or not?
Janet Tuhey commented 2012-07-13 17:14:44 -0400 · Flag
Troll Diana did not come here to become better informed. Trying to educate a troll is about as easy as describing color to a blind person.
Visitor 55 commented 2012-07-13 17:06:48 -0400 · Flag
@just Runner, diana the sheep won’t answer your question. Instead she’ll bleat that you’re demonizing her because you refuse to swallow the same right-wing lies and bullshit that she’s swallowed. It’s typical behavior of a FoxGOPTV sheep.
Visitor 55 commented 2012-07-13 17:05:06 -0400 · Flag
@diana, I’m not demonizing you, diana. I’m simply pointing out the truth to you. You obviously don’t know the meaning of truth or honesty. Figures. You’re a FoxGOPTV sheep, so it’s not all that surprising. I’m done with you. You’re not interested in providing CREDIBLE proof to back up your insane crap, nor are you interested in an honest discussion. All you’re interested in is demonizing and name calling.
just Runner commented 2012-07-13 16:59:28 -0400 · Flag
@diana, Where is this “squeaky” clean record? Did you not read the Boston Globe article? Just because the Romney campaign reject the article, doesn’t make the article any less credible. Also, for the record, you don’t have to be a liberal to know Fox news lies to anyone that will listen to them. I’m Libertarian. Not the Tea Party, they are the Koch brothers smoke screen.
1  2  3  Next →
blog advertising is good for you






or sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Subscribe with RSS

Make Custom Gifts at CafePress


Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Created with NationBuilder