As they say, changes in latitude, changes in attitude. Back in May of this year, in defending his beloved GOP and reinforcing the Fox message that there is no war on women, Sean Hannity attempted to dismiss criticism of a House bill, co-sponsored by Todd Aking (and Paul Ryan) that would have provided abortion funding for rape victims only in cases of "forcible rape" - wording that would have severely limited the definition of rape and incest in order to further limit Medicaid payments for abortions in cases of rape. Because of the public outcry, that language was taken out of the final bill. Hannity claimed that those who cite this bill, as an example of the GOP's war on women's reproductive rights, are just "distorting" the Republican record. So I guess while Hannity had no problem with "forcible" rape, "legitimate rape" is a bridge too far?
Watch Hannity try to divert, distract, and derail with his question about what is "non forcible" rape.
They lie, flip flop, attack and defame.
It really doesn’t matter if the words are not true,
Some will believe it, that’s nothing new.
Romney switches opinions, like most people change socks
to get more of the votes, no matter, it’s “bollocks”.
I have my suspicion, IF Mitt wasn’t, “born rich”,
He would likely sell cars, or have some other sales pitch.
It’s easy to tell, the guy has no clue,how the rest of us live, when he talks to you.His lips move, but when asked what he thinks,Gives platitudes, canned answers, which change in a blink.
He’s trying to convince, The American people, That the wealthy will look out, for the poor little “sheeple” Trickle it down!… is the cry from the top
BUT we all know by now,…that is a CROCK!