NewsHounds
We watch Fox so you don't have to!
  • Home
  • About
  • Naughty Corner
  • Forum
  • Archives
  • Blogroll
  • Donate
  • Shop
  • Contact
Home →

Fr. Jonathan Morris Encourages Democrats To Leave Party?

Posted by Priscilla 0.40pc on June 18, 2012 · Flag

Fox News has been unabashedly supportive of the American Catholic bishops in their opposition to the Obama administration's birth control mandate which the bishops claim is really about their right to "religious freedom." Fox News has promoted this meme about religious liberty at every opportunity in what seems to be an effort to ensure that aggrieved Catholics vote GOP. Fox's only clergy religion contributor, Fr. Jonathan Morris, has spoken about this supposed violation of religious freedom. He has also discussed the the "non-negotiable" items which Catholic are supposed to use as the basis for voting. Yesterday, during his weekly homily, Morris combined these two issues in a discussion about why southern Democrats are deserting the party. While he tried to be non-partisan, the message was clear. Even the video title, which seemed to be culled straight from an article from the Catholic News Agency, framed the agitprop: "Democrats Leaving Party Over" - you guessed it - "Religious Freedom?"  

Fox & Friends back bencher and all around Renaissance woman, Juliette Huddy (whose skirt elevation was, hopefully, not an "occasion of sin" for Fr. Morris!) immediately framed the issue by asking if Democrats are leaving the party "over marriage and religious freedom concerns." The message is that if you're a good Catholic, who is on board with the bishops' concern about "religious freedom," you might want to rethink your party affiliation. She cited statistics which show that the number of Mississippi Democrats have declined by 5% between 2008 and 2011 and asked what's "driving" the numbers. (Uh, the election of Barack Obama?) She introduced the cute, little padre who very dramatically intoned that it's all about the party platform of the Democratic Party.  He enthused that, regardless of party affiliation, it's good a thing because when a platform of a party "begins to take on issues that are non-negotiable for yourself, its good that you say that this party no longer represents my core values."

In order to look like he was singling out Democrats, he noted that the GOP should also "be on guard" because when a party becomes a "club," rather than a political force that represents your values," the power of the system is lost. He said that, for many party stalwarts, "all of a sudden the platform switches and I find myself going against my core beliefs."  He warned parties not to believe that they can hold people because historically they have them. As with many Morris' homilies, he offered what appeared to be a "fair & balanced" approach in warning that if Republicans take on a hard line anti-immigration stance, many values voters could flee the party. It's worth noting that Catholic "non-negotiable" issues do not include immigration. They are all about abortion, gay marriage, and embryonic stem cell research.

While the article that Fox appeared to have sourced was quite straightforward in its account of how Mississippi and other Southern Democrats switched parties over abortion and gay marriage, Morris was more nuanced. (Maybe he didn't read the article?)  But his references to party "platform" seemed to be a dog whistle for Catholics as the Democratic party platform supports a woman's right to an abortion while the GOP platform is anti-choice. The "non-negotiables" are also another convenient Catholic strategy for instructing their flock on how to vote without actually endorsing candidates - wink, wink.

So was the erstwhile Foxpriest instructing the faithful, once again, to vote Republican?  Certainly, on the "fair & balanced" Fox News network, Father knows best so it's all good....

Fr._Morris_Playtime.jpg


Do you like this post?
Tweet
submit to reddit

Showing 20 reactions



    Review the site rules
Joshua Hatheway commented 2012-06-20 08:20:29 -0400 · Flag
@Visitor 55, Also it would NOT be stupid for an insurance company to allow restrictions. I do not know the numbers, but I am sure the Catholic Church employs a great number of people which would mean a bunch of premiums coming in. I would argue, in fact, that insurance companies would be knocking down doors to get that account.
Joshua Hatheway commented 2012-06-20 08:15:04 -0400 · Flag
@Visitor 55 Now we have gotten to the crux of the matter. I am sure in a FREE market, the Catholic Church and their employing entities could find an insurance company that would be willing to adhere to their restrictions on contraception. If you think I align with the church you are wrong, but I do believe they should be free to restrict coverage according to their beliefs.
Visitor 55 commented 2012-06-19 20:59:24 -0400 · Flag
@Josh, when an employer offers benefits THEY pay part of the premium

So? That doesn’t mean that the employer gets to make the ultimate decision about how the insurance company distributes the money. And it would be stupid for an insurance company to let that happen.
Joshua Hatheway commented 2012-06-19 07:44:28 -0400 · Flag
@visitor 55— one thing you left out though is that when an employer offers benefits THEY pay part of the premium… hence the benefit part of it. Of course the insurance companies are happy to pay because they already got their money, some of which is paid by the provider of the benefits.
Kent Brockman commented 2012-06-19 07:28:27 -0400 · Flag
The Frocked Little Monkey Sez

I tell lies all day long, and dream up new lies in my sleep. That’s why I support Cardinal Dolan when he sez no alter boys were harmed under his watch. Besides, boys can’t get pregnant so who’s to say anything really went on?
Average American Patriot commented 2012-06-19 03:55:53 -0400 · Flag
Sorry for going off topic.

I just run across this.

Candace Conti Awarded $28M In Jehovah’s Witness Sex Abuse Case

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/16/calif-jury-awards-28m-in-_n_1602997.html

Do we know if the Fox gNOpig Propaganda has mentioned it?
Aria Prescott commented 2012-06-19 00:41:55 -0400 · Flag
Father Maciel must be SO proud of this guy…
Chico Brisbane commented 2012-06-18 22:43:14 -0400 · Flag
The only thing this democrat has left is the catholic church. I do not put money in the collection plate of my church so they can then turn around and use it to sue my government.
Visitor 55 commented 2012-06-18 21:18:36 -0400 · Flag
@joshua hatheway. “I am ignorant as hell…”.

You said it, hon. I’m not gonna argue that point with you.

But here’s the facts…

Religious entities that are against contraceptives are exempt from the mandate. They don’t have to pay for contraceptives. They aren’t being forced to pay for contraceptives. Instead, the insurance companies have happily agreed to pay. It’s cheaper for them than insuring a pregnancy. Do you understand that, Josh? Religious entities are not being forced to do anything.

Now let me straighten you out on another thing. Condoms aren’t the issue here. This may come as a surprise to you, condoms are not the only form of contraceptive. They’re just the tip of the penis, if you will. Did you know that many women who have issues such as ovarian cysts, certain forms of ovarian and uterine cancers, uterine fibroid tumors, endometriosis, painful periods and a host of other issues rely on oral contraceptives to counter those issues? You see, Josh, contrary to what Lardass Limpdick oinks, contraceptives aren’t always used to stop pregnancy, and women who use contraceptives are not sluts.

Most people who have health insurance pay a monthly premium. It more than likely is deducted from their paycheck. So, nobody is asking for free contraceptives. What they’re asking for is that contraceptives be fully covered by the insurance company that they’re paying a premium to. And why not? Insurance companies fully cover erectile dysfunction medication, so why shouldn’t they fully cover contraceptives for women?

And no, it wouldn’t kinda be like forcing a Muslim school to serve pork because nobody is forcing religious entities to pay for contraceptives, and nobody is forcing Catholic women to take contraceptives.

There you go, Josh. Now you’re a little less ignorant.
mj - the same one commented 2012-06-18 20:59:40 -0400 · Flag
Doncha just LOVE it whenever rightwingnuts offer “advice”, “encouragement”, or “concern” for Democrats or the Democratic Party?

.
Lakeview Greg commented 2012-06-18 18:30:48 -0400 · Flag
Remember that part in the bible that says you shouldn’t use the name of the creator for your own ends? Father needs to take a refresher…
mlp ! commented 2012-06-18 18:20:14 -0400 · Flag
A decline of Democratic voters in Mississippi?
Damn, I really didn’t know that hell-hole was in play!
Much ado about nothing, Father Spanky!
truman commented 2012-06-18 16:45:17 -0400 · Flag
@joshua hatheway. “I am ignorant as hell…”. Your email proves that.
Joshua Hatheway commented 2012-06-18 15:43:11 -0400 · Flag
I don’t see what all the fuss is about on this topic. If Catholic entities don’t want to pay for contraception don’t work for one if free contraception is that important to you. You can get free condoms pretty much in any city high school or free clinic so I guess if you really need the job you could still take it. I dont understand why that type of coverage has to be mandated for all employers. I am ignorant as hell but I don’t think they want to deny that type of coverage across the board, they just want an exemption because it conflicts with their religious tenets. Correct me if I’m wrong.

It’s kinda like forcing a Muslim school to serve pork once a week because its part of a well rounded diet.
doors17 commented 2012-06-18 15:27:25 -0400 · Flag
DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — A group of Roman Catholic nuns have left Des Moines on a two-week bus tour of nine states to protest Republican federal budget proposals that the group believes hurt the poor and vulnerable.

The Nuns on the Bus tour left Monday for Ames. It is scheduled to finish in Washington on July 2.

The nuns will visit Catholic-sponsored social service agencies and the offices of Republican members of Congress, including Rep. Steve King’s office in Ames, House Speaker John Boehner’s office in Chester, Ohio, and Rep. Eric Cantor’s office in Richmond, Va.

Organizer Sister Simone Campbell and three other nuns received a send-off from about 20 local Catholic nuns, parishioners and the priest from a Des Moines church. Network, a Catholic social justice lobby is sponsoring the tour.
Visitor 55 commented 2012-06-18 14:31:48 -0400 · Flag
Does anyone remember, back in the 80’s, there was a mini-series called The Thorn Birds? The sexy little padre thinks he’s Cardinal Ralph de Bricassart and that everyone else is the impressionable gullible Meggie who was in love with him. The sexy little padre needs to wake up.
Diane Patyjewicz commented 2012-06-18 13:39:45 -0400 · Flag
I think the title should have been “Catholic leaving church due to lack of ’freedom”.
truman commented 2012-06-18 12:49:25 -0400 · Flag
As a faithful servant of the Fux Noise dogma, Father Spanky should know that a decline in Democratic voters in MIssissippi might be at least partially driven by the plethora of rednecks residing there.

Is the decline in Catholic Church membership caused by the parishoners’ revulsion to pedophile priests and the bishops/cardinals who protect them? Just asking.
Visitor 55 commented 2012-06-18 12:25:19 -0400 · Flag
Somebody told the sexy little padre too many times that he was all that.

Note to the sexy little padre:

You’re not as influential or important as you’ve led yourself to believe. And the majority of the mindless FoxGOPTV sheep are non-Catholics who have been brainwashed to believe that Catholicism is as much a cult as Mormonism. Get over yourself.
blog advertising is good for you






or sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Subscribe with RSS

Make Custom Gifts at CafePress


Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Created with NationBuilder